>>932443
>If you can describe any affirmative legacy superheroes, would they have any real flaws?
Ms Mudslime has actually failed at things. Not sure if that equated to a flaw, but she isn't a full Mary Sue like most other female characters. For the rest of the diversity cast their "flaws" are usually some surface level bullshit along the lines of not believing in themselves enough, but everyone around them still tells them they're awesome, of course.
>would you be capable of describing Miles Morales and Khamala Khan's characters without saying their looks, race or powers?
For the most part, yes. But that's only because 95% of these characters are cunty Whedon knockoffs. You just take a grab back of awful overused bland tropes. Sassy, sarcastic, smart, optimistic, "kick-ass", tough but feminine, etc. The problem isn't that don't have a character, it's that there's no depth to their character and they all sound the same. Because SJWs only care about skin deep features. The fact that Riri is black and a girl is more important than who she is.
>>932600
Here you are not married to a disgusting hambeast who proudly cucks you while dress up like a faggot and repeat the same tired shit. "AAA studios are greedy, mircotransactions REEEEEEE, steam greenlight has a lot crap on it, people are mean to trannies REEEEEE" I'd take principles and someone who actually cares about me, than Sterling's sad existence.