/christianity/ - Christian Theology

Meanwhile in Europe they are discussing extending abortion to months after birth.

Kentucky Governor has signed a few of these as well. Good stuff, shame they're all immediately challenged by the ACLU

Based.

Starve them of their moloch sacrifices.

>>4104

What!!! Source pls.

>>4141

They call it "post-natal" or "after-birth abortion". Ask your favorite search engine for it.

It's the slippery slope you end up with, when you already have "9 month abortion".

>>4160

Of course, once you got past fetal murder, the arbitrary point of living birth doesn't stand long as the boundary.

That's why you see some people jokingly propose after-birth abortions for 50 years old "pro-choice" supporters.

I'll never understand "pro-choice" murder-mongers. They always screech about "stop pushing your religion on me" but abortion doesn't even make logical sense when you look at it. Their reasons for supporting abortion are

>it's not a life, it's a clump of cells

<you're a clump of cells too, woman, can I kill you legally? And if we found a clump of cells on Mars it'd be headline news: "life on Mars discovered"

>ok, well it can't survive on its own, so I shouldn't be forced to support it

<a 1-year old can't survive on its own either, can we kill that? How about a person in a coma?

>well what about if a woman is raped?

<that's unfortunate but crime doesn't justify more crime, you don't get a free pass to kill someone just because you've been raped

>but it's my body

<actually, the fetus has its own DNA, it is literally not your body

>but I won't be able to support it

<that sucks, but we shouldn't kill people just because they're poor, adoption is always on the table

It just baffles me that they can't even be consistent enough to see the flaws in their arguments.

>>4180

>They always screech about "stop pushing your religion on me"

Gods commandments ban abortion, because it's a mortal sin.

Human-made laws OTOH are strictly based on "usefulness", regardless of what their pseudo-"ethics" pretend to be.

But when you have "usefulness" as the only metric, all you need to decide is "useful to whom".

1. Useful to the fetus? No.

2. Useful to the pregnant mother? Yes.

3. Useful to the business of the abortion clinic? Hell, yes!

>>4102

Less than what is needed, more than what I expected. Hallelujah!

>>4180

They worship Moloch anon. Our God is against their god, and our rules against theirs. It's simple theology and psychology.

>>4183

>Gods commandments ban abortion, because it's a mortal sin.

Incorrect. God considers a fetus to be property, not a person. God orders the death penalty for murder, including the accidental murder during a fight, but commands only payment of a fee for inducing the loss of a fetus. A fetus, according to God's word, is property, like owning an animal.

>>4187

Untrue

I'm sure you're referencing this:

>Exodus 21:22-23 NASB — “If men struggle with each other and strike a woman with child so that she gives birth prematurely, yet there is no injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman’s husband may demand of him, and he shall pay fnas the judges decide. “But if there is any further injury, then you shall appoint as a penalty life for life,

If the baby had died, he would deserve execution just like for adults.

But even if it were as you say, it is erroneous to say that an absence of capital punishment for a killing means the victim isn't viewed as a person. That is a presumption on your part.

Consider negligent homicide in the same chapter. Does an adult Israelite become a non-person if he's killed by negligence? God doesn't instruct the execution of the perpetrator.

>>4187

Also, reminder to view all arguments as speculation when they don't include scripture references

If a women tells you "my body my choice," tell her that if the baby is a boy she has a penis.

>>4189

your inability to read makes it hard to take you seriously. You have a clear lack of understanding of Israelite law as set out in Torah and as practiced by those several thousand years closer to the source than you.

>>4104

Dang moloch worshippers

>>4153

It'd make their evil very transparent, which is probably why they haven't legalized this yet. It'd be plain infanticide. I mean, late term abortion is essentially the same thing, but normies and evil women are able to pretend that it isn't childmurder since it's going on inside the woman.

As good as the news are, it's sad to see how white women are responding to this. When they're not lying and claiming that the new law means that any woman that has a miscarriage will be jailed or that all abortions are banned, they're responding with hysterics. It's apparently essential to these people to be able to kill babies with heartbeats inside them.

>>4424

I don't think most women are super into murdering their unborn children (though I'm sure some exist), it's more like they want to live the maximum slut lifestyle so heavily promoted by (((them))) and the notion that actions have consequences (sex -> pregnancy), being women, scares the crap out of them.