First off, a c*lvinist, just want to say, this is among the logical conclusions of broken theology. Muh "I'm saved already" nonsense which obviates moral responsibility. The Father does not predestine souls as the shooter suggests, this should be obvious from Pauline theology; oddly the same verses which indicate the rejection of the Jews "Now if some branches have been broken off, and you, a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others to share in the nourishment of the olive root, do not boast over those branches. If you do, remember this: You do not support the root, but the root supports you…" Romans (11:17-18) then later "do not be arrogant, but be afraid" Romans (11:20). The bitter fruits of heresy gentlemen.
Second off, and on another level entirely this wouldn't be the first time that Jews and Christians have been at one another's throats. The moral cancer known as blood libel has a long history, the fact that it resurfaced indicates social instability. Blood libel is a known quantity that comes about when people haven't kept their house in order morally, politically and socially. Just another sign that something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
>>3468
>Is violence in self-defence Biblical?
Yes, but this is not an instance of self-defence. Moses slew the Egyptian for beating a fellow Hebrew, Judith slew Holofernes, and David ordered the deaths of those who threatened Susanna all these were instances of justice.
>Is preemptive action in self-defence Biblical?
Preemptive action in self-defence is contradictory.
>Can killing enemies be Biblically justified as loving them?
Warfare, if we are speaking of just war theory, is an unfortunate necessity, but we do not speak of loving the enemy, rather loving the neighbour who is threatened by that enemy. (See Judith and Holofernes, David and Goliath, etc.)
>Is it against God's will for a racial group to be eliminated?
There has never been a 100% successful genocide of a cultural group, even in Joshua, so it would seem that it is against God's will. I think it's more important to note that nobody since has used the book of Joshua for justification of additional genocides, and nobody since has been given a sanction to perform one, so safe to say that the answer is no.
>Are the Jews conspiring to eliminate the white race?
Nice try FBI, but in all seriousness I think Jews and Gentiles misunderstand each other; Gentiles have this view, inculcated in them, that Jews possess some special something, Jews know however that they do not. Regardless of who is right and who is wrong, both sides exist in uneasy tension between Gentile hope and Jewish despair. Both don't understand each other, so both hate each other, but also both mutually fear each other. There is a code of respect you might say, but it can be broken in political turmoils. It's a love-hate relationship. I'm mixed race between them, though a Gentile by Rabbinic law so I've seen both sides and I prefer the hopefulness of Gentiles, but no, except for rare racist Jews, most understandably want to get through life without any Jew-Gentile warfare. They know they would lose due to numbers, and most don't really believe in God enough to interrupt their affairs for religious reasons.