/christianity/

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Flag
Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

Pius 03/28/19 (Thu) 12:31:38 adf3e8 No.2022

Why was he so based bros

03/28/19 (Thu) 12:55:03 91fe64 No.2023

Because he boldly affirms what you think from a position of authority. This is called "confirmation bias"

03/28/19 (Thu) 16:46:29 ecc177 No.2024

>Protestantism is the sum of Arianism, Nestorianism etc etc.

This quote is so retarded I doubt even he said it

03/28/19 (Thu) 23:28:41 599603 No.2039

>>2024

You doubt the stupidity and corruption of the stupidiest and most corrupt human organization's king-bishop?

03/29/19 (Fri) 00:09:36 8a21c0 No.2041

>>2039

Agreed that catholics are wrong but there are dumber and more sinister groups in history

04/03/19 (Wed) 02:18:14 f6d70e No.2305

>>2022

Papists need Mary and King Daddy to stand between them and Jesus, along with 2000 years of accumulated human error.

04/03/19 (Wed) 21:41:08 1e02a2 No.2342

>>2024

>Nestorianism

It's important to point out that Nestorius himself wasn't even wrong and the Catholics some 40 years later decided he was right, but they couldn't dare say that, so they wordgamed around the problem and claimed that they had a third path in the argument he was making where they literally invented new words that meant the same things he was saying and redefined other words to mean what he was saying.

Aside from the part that he said scripture and faith led to Jesus, not praying to some man on a seat. That would be found correct some ~1100 years later.

04/03/19 (Wed) 21:49:00 477b76 No.2343

>>2342

>It's important to point out that Nestorius himself wasn't even wrong and the Catholics some 40 years later decided he was right, but they couldn't dare say that, so they wordgamed around the problem and claimed that they had a third path in the argument he was making where they literally invented new words that meant the same things he was saying and redefined other words to mean what he was saying.

Could you elaborate? This is news to me.

04/04/19 (Thu) 20:20:47 2f655a No.2381

>>2342

>It's important to point out that Nestorius himself wasn't even wrong and the Catholics some 40 years later decided he was right, but they couldn't dare say that, so they wordgamed around the problem and claimed that they had a third path in the argument he was making where they literally invented new words that meant the same things he was saying and redefined other words to mean what he was saying.

Not a single thing you just said is correct

>Aside from the part that he said scripture and faith led to Jesus, not praying to some man on a seat.

This was not disputed by Cyril