>>807392
Mainline prots support divorce and everything else that contemporary culture does. Part of the reason I left my last church was because so many seemed to be on their second marriage. I don't know every situation (though I knew plenty of occasions where wives were throwing their husbands out), but it sure sat wrong with me.
Reformed and conservative denoms are more restrictive, but I don't think they're restrictive enough at times. The general rule you hear is "infidelity or abandonment" But Matt 5:32 only seems to make divorce OK for infidelity, yet applies the label of "adulterer" to anyone who remarries. Matt 19:9 seems to combine the two, so that remarriage after infidelity is "safe."
As for abandonment..well, if they end up sleeping with another person, that seems to hit the infidelity criteria anyways…I know the prooftext for this is 1 Cor 7:15, but the "bondage" that the spouse is freed from is more likely the responsibility to provide (1 Tm 5:8) and have sex with (1 Cor 7:5)
Of course this is all based on the assumption that the "exception clause" is talking about a cheating spouse (who back then would have been killed….till death do you part) Some, such as Steven Anderson and John Piper take it to mean the discovery of fornication early on in the marriage
https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/on-divorce-and-remarriage-in-the-event-of-adultery
I tend to agree with this. If it wasn't for forcing celibacy on those who lack the gift, I would probably be in line with Catholic teaching on marriage and divorce.