>>803032
That's unjust (I assume it's Calvinism and it's attempt to equalize everyone.. perhaps originally admirable, but ultimately unjust). All sin is sin, but not all sin is worthy of the Lake of Fire. That is not what scripture says. The Lake of Fire is reserved for Satan, the Antichrist, etc.., and the worst of sinners.
"The fearful [i.e. those who fear persecution], and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death." - Rev 21:8
Jesus, in his sermon on the mount, also would separate different punishments depending on degree of sin. He didn't equalize everything.
"Whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire. Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee; Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way; first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift. Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison. Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing." - Matt 5:22-26
So you have one form of anger leading to a vague type of "judgement", the next a "council", then the next hell fire. Then he expands further and says another is a type of severe condemnation that you only be released from a long time ("till thou has paid the uttermost farthing"). Not to say anyone needs to adopt the Catholic juridical view of things, but the "blanket" view of all sin typical of Protestants doesn't seem as "Sola Scriptura" as they want everyone to think either.