1dc896 No.798183
This was an /r/atheism meetup. Tell me honestly bros, would a /christian/ meetup look any different?
60bc34 No.798187
bed5de No.798189
Probably less degenerates, soyfaces and fat people.
d052a7 No.798191
Of course it would. For starters, there would only be one woman there, maybe two, a majority of the men would have full beards and exactly zero attendees would be wearing graphic t-shirts.
943ad2 No.798193
Eh, probably not much different, no. Internet groups always have an idealized image of "the group", but the reality is much more …. human. I'm sure we have fat people here, ugly people, "soy faced" people. We are human and, therefor, imperfect.
Though we might have more dogs. Because dogs are awesome.
09f4d1 No.798194
>>798183
>la creatura atea
9395bf No.798198
>>798183
Not really, just less women probably. It would be kinda cool to meet up someday though, so long as we kept out of denominational arguments
55217a No.798286
>>798183
It would be better than that. Jesus Christ anon, you're hurting my feelings now.
Really you'd have a lot more people wearing glasses.
2e476b No.798290
>>798286
I wonder how many of us wear glasses? I do.
a83045 No.798304
Sure, it'd look different.
>only one or two women
>some of the men would show up in suits
>less obesity and neckbeards
>no pets
>christ-chan and deus vult art instead of plebbit signs
>every baptist would have a kjv bible tucked under their left arm
>one of the based schizoposters on here would show up in a homemade crusader costume
>the meetup would devolve into a shouting match, with the occasional "pastor jim" and "cuck pope" thrown around
It would be very cringy, but not nearly as much as /r/atheist or /pol/ meetups.
8b3c20 No.798307
8b3c20 No.798308
7cba23 No.798311
>>798304
The (mystical) body is ready
09a21c No.798332
>>798183
The oldfags would bring their wives
7c5ec4 No.798360
Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>798183
>Disney shit
>Star Wars
>Obese single mothers
>Soy face men
All is missing is men wearing my little pony t-shirts.
c7c174 No.798375
cc3ebe No.798376
>>798191
>>798304
>even one woman on /christian/
b1724e No.798391
>>798376
There's at least two I know of, probably optimistic but most good Christian women would probably avoid bringing up that they are female all the time. So maybe more
e3e390 No.798394
I don't know. I didn't even know that people could be that fat, that woman on the front looks just like that zombie from Left For Dead.
This image is seriously making me think about lifting (I'm skinny).
e3e390 No.798395
>>798286
>>798286
>>798290
I do too, we should make a censo.
a83045 No.798412
>>798376
There's one or two regulars on here who are women - they seldom mention it is all. I think pic related sums up the current state of this board; our secret club is sometimes mentioned on the Web by newfriends (greens), we get the occasional militant feminist, Jewish shill, or Baptist shitposter (browns) that come here and don't want to play nice, but otherwise the community is largely the same and outsiders must assimilate.
>>798394
>I didn't even know that people could be that fat, that woman on the front looks just like that zombie from Left For Dead
Kek. I take it you aren't American? About 1 in 4 of the women in my area look like that.
>This image is seriously making me think about lifting (I'm skinny)
Do it! I've finally gotten into the rhythm of lifting every other day, and only a week later, I'm already noticing gains.
286ee9 No.798431
>>798414
>what are Rules 1&2
38a129 No.798453
>>798183
Yeah. Unironically there would be people of every race there for starters. We got people from all over the world in this place last time we got a proper consensus. From North and South America across Europe through Russia and unto Asia.
a83045 No.798472
>>798414
Perhaps a better term would be "our obscure Taiwanese knitting board". Nevertheless, we've flown under the radar over the years and survived because of it, the same of which cannot be said for /pol/. We're very fortunate to have a place that allows us to discuss our faith, freely and without subversion.
4a5658 No.798474
that was an r/lexington meetup
stop bearing false witness
286ee9 No.798482
feaced No.798497
>>798431
You mean those "rules of /b/" written on the Gaia Online forums? Well, this ain't /b/.
1ad6a6 No.798498
>>798472
>We're very fortunate to have a place that allows us to discuss our faith, freely and without subversion.
LMAO the absolute state of the West
3986a0 No.798500
It would be exactly as cringey.
a66fbc No.798509
>>798183
of course. It would look like pic related.
7c5ec4 No.798589
>>798304
>but not nearly as much as /r/atheist or /pol/ meetups.
/christian/ meets up probably look similar to /k/ meet ups.
943ad2 No.798606
If you want to know what a /christian/ meetup would look like, all you have to do is look around your church.
86cd9e No.798876
>>798606
based and breadpilled
dc37da No.798881
>>798482
It says so on the left
548ce7 No.802955
>>798183
Is that chadtronic?
af3683 No.803256
What are you talking about, Anon? We have meetups every Sunday and they look like pic related.
2be81d No.803297
>>803256
They looked like this in the 50s in the better parts of the community. Now they look like nursing home gatherings or ghost towns, depending if there's a holiday celebration going on at the moment.
7c5ec4 No.803394
Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>802955
Something about chadtronic that screams out child predator.
bb0e0b No.803396
>>803297
Maybe in your diocese, but in mine it's families and their many kids. Babies crying all the time, etc etc. Don't believe the memes you see online. Jesus' Church is alive and well.
e35b33 No.803403
>>798193
I'm sure we have less than on reddit. This place is anonymous; so people don't come on here to make themselves feel good for magic internet points. I will be the first to admit though that I do browse chans to make myself feel good similarly to social media but I think we would still have a few OP pucks related. on a side note an anon onetime posted his steam account and I was the only one who responded back. we have been playing various games occasionally and I can say that it really improved my opinion of the board. Even though it is one guy the few people I know who browse this board aren't LARPers and genuinely try to be close to christ. I think we should have more outside the chans interaction since I think we k8ssout on a lot of /comfy/ and fellowship.
e35b33 No.803404
>>803403
>>803403
>>803403
>k8ssout
I meant "missout,,
842eef No.803420
9395bf No.803445
>>798183
Dude it says r/lexington on a poster. Wym it’s an r/atheism meetup?
842eef No.803466
>>803445
to give op benefit of doubt maybe it was a /r/atheist meetup at lexington
94dbca No.803917
>>798589
Just realised that if the media finds this board it would obviously be named "homophobic" without thinking
16a1b3 No.803933
>>798183
A /christian/ meetup would consist solely of wide-eyed, frowny-faced, 20-something White guys, mostly of a generally skinny to skinnyfat bodytype.
And maybe like one token filipino and maybe possibly one token female.
I am very, very confident in this prediction.
281276 No.803935
>>803933
why do you think that?
16a1b3 No.803946
>>803935
Because I'm projecting.
223fd7 No.803949
365c9d No.803996
>>798183
It would look like this.
46d570 No.804001
>>803933
I can be your token Italic person.
As well as the guy who has a general hatred for Communism as well as Nazism.
f1ddf5 No.806922
>>798497
From Encyclopedia Dramatica:
There is no real set of Rules to the Internet, only a standard four on which everyone agrees (1, 2, 33, 34, and 35) and some bullshit rules that came out of nowhere. Rules 12 and 13, however, apply universally and ruthlessly, whether you agree with them or not, and people's reputations are regularly destroyed as a result of breaking them. While 8 and 9 here are intended to specifically refer to /b/ on 4chan, in practical terms, the reality is that they actually apply on virtually every moderated Internet forum in existence. Some forums might have extremely extensive sets of written rules, but said rules generally won't prevent the owner of the given site from banning someone for no reason at all, other than for the lulz .
Several of the other rules here, also function effectively as observations about Internet philosophy; they don't necessarily describe the way people should behave online, so much as the way they do behave. Although to a milder extent, this was also true on Usenet, which predated /b/, and was generally much less hostile; so they can be viewed as an important artifact of Internet history. Rules 18, 20, 36, 42, and 43, are also generally only true among atheists.
There have been countless renderings of the rules, all of which have sucked balls in one way or another, the earliest originating from IRC faggotry. Nonetheless, since all 13-year-old boys subconsciously crave supervision because their parents are physically and emotionally unavailable (much like converts to Islam crave direction in a world gone mad after leaving the family hugbox) , The Rules of the Internet have become a virtual Internets Ten Commandments for them.
9a4389 No.806929
>>806922
>using ED as a source
Seriously?
1651c3 No.806931
>>806929
>not using ED as a source when it comes to Internet Drama
Seriously?
5ad956 No.806979
>>798183
>would a /christian/ meetup look any different?
yes
5b7f42 No.806991
>>798589
This raises the question, what are you packin lads? Gonna get me an AO M1 carbines soon
5bc45e No.807026
>>806991
>datamining
Nice try, FBI, but you won't fool me in to telling you how many homemade stens I have.
c7c174 No.807128
>>806931
The internet culture can go straight to hell.
792d95 No.807131
c396da No.807143
>>806991
>what are you packin lads?
628a17 No.807225
>>806991
Sorry glowtigger, nice try
06d55c No.809179
>>798183
(1) go to reddit instead if you want meetups. There is no need for any meetups.
06d55c No.809180
>>798304
/pol/ meetup? When did this happen?