Census of Qurinius?

Email
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

Census of Qurinius? Christanon 12/23/18 (Sun) 05:22:35 416ed8 No.745633

So was Qurinius govenor 6 C.E. or 4 B.C.? Because most histroians agree Qirinius was governor not at the of Herod the Great.

Also, even if the census could be dated 4 B.C., Romans censuses did not require one to return to their ancestral home. Typically the Romans would just go from house to house where people lived. If returning to ancestral home had happened, surely it would have been mentioned by Josephus right since it would've been a huge event. Thousands of people would be immigrating all around.

Most scholars and historians think Luke was simply mistaken because he was trying to have Jesus fulfill prophecy. In reality Jesus was most likely born in or nearby Nazareth.

So how do we solve these problems?

Christanon 12/23/18 (Sun) 05:40:50 2089da No.745642

>C.E.

Christanon 12/23/18 (Sun) 06:10:32 9c00e9 No.745651

I smell Jews

Christanon 12/23/18 (Sun) 06:21:29 cd88ba No.745652

https://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=6&article=907

Christanon 12/23/18 (Sun) 06:26:47 b24dbf No.745653

>>745633

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/ramsay/bethlehem.iv.vii.html

Good evidence to suggest Qurinius had 2 governorships.

Christanon 12/23/18 (Sun) 06:32:29 409651 No.745655

>>745633

If you don't believe in Jesus Christ, that's your choice anon.

Christanon 12/23/18 (Sun) 08:37:09 41c85b No.745673

>>745633

>CE

Christanon 12/23/18 (Sun) 18:42:32 3332f3 No.745789

Iirc Benedict XVI made some good points on the dating issue

Tldr the dating of Christ's birth was done like 150 years after the fact, so they clearly winnie the poohed it up, hence why nothing lines up

Christanon 12/23/18 (Sun) 21:00:18 bde578 No.745810

>CE

Christanon 12/23/18 (Sun) 21:23:31 d326f4 No.745824

>>745633

>CE

>fellow goys how do we solve these problems of Luke being wrong and Jesus maybe not even being born at all, all the modern (()scholars))) think Luke was a straight white male bigot

Into the fiery lake it goes

Christanon 12/23/18 (Sun) 21:27:13 f48932 No.745827

>>745633

>CE

back to reddit with ye

Christanon 12/23/18 (Sun) 21:36:07 34af36 No.745834

>Modern historians

>CE

Christanon 12/24/18 (Mon) 17:49:44 9a2143 No.746118

>everyone pissing their pants over C.E. even though OP also put B.C.

Christanon 12/24/18 (Mon) 18:22:52 3332f3 No.746129

>>746118