[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ausneets / christ / hydrus / misr / sw / tenda / vg / vichan ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

File: 68ae3558b29a92b⋯.jpg (148.24 KB, 800x595, 160:119, image.jpg)

eb5360  No.744912

I consider myself lapsed Catholic and don't really have problem with individual Anglicans but wasn't Anglicanism created/revived by a fat king so he could dump his wife and make the church his minion by proclaiming himself head of church and taking their property? I hardly consider him good Christian. Isn't that similar to what Nazi Germany did and modern China trying to do? At least Luther had legit concerns about corruption within church. Am I forgetting something?

cd962a  No.744914

But I want to divorce my wife, bro.


d5179a  No.744917

>>744914

Just chop her head, bro.


cd962a  No.744924

>>744917

Yo pro tips man, thnx.


6601f1  No.744932

Yes and no. Basically that was a catalyst. But moving forward, Anglicanism forged a via media between Catholicism and Protestantism. The church is really indebted to the various churchmen who contributed to its identity. Henry doesnt define Anglicanism. He just made it possible. To be fair, most Lutheran princes just chose Lutheranism as their state religion so they could take property also. I wouldnt be an Anglican, but mostly because it is a dying church full of liberals. There was a time, though, when it was something admirable and there might have been a chance for it to reconcile with the Orrhodox church. Then they started ordaining women and shit.


7bddd4  No.745119

MORE WIVES YOUR GRACE?


7594de  No.745167

Best thing about the Anglicans is that they gave us the puritans


107e09  No.745169

File: 6d50728bb097c66⋯.jpg (17.39 KB, 495x362, 495:362, 1526311235151.jpg)

>>744932

WE COULD'VE ACCEPTED ANGLICANS INTO ORTHODOXY! WHY DID THEY CHOOSE THIS ABOMINABLE PATH INSTEAD?!


286875  No.745178

>>745169

Anglicans are schisming, between the conservatives (headed by the Archbishop of Nigeria) and the liberals (headed by the Episcopalian Archbishop) with the Archbishop in Canterbury doing everything to hold it together.

The Anglican communion won't fully schism because it has put unity and temporal practicality above truth (which goes back to the via media doctrine between the English Catholics and English Protestants). The realignment movement (conservatives) believe they can influence the broader church away from the liberals. They do things like setting up competitive structures in liberal areas (e.g. the conservative Anglican Church of North America was setup as a refuge for conservatives in the Episcopalian church). The liberal churches then sue conservative priests who go to those new structures, usually trying to take the church buildings out from underneath the parish.

It will take something really, really big for a schism to happen, like the Archbishop of Canterbury taking a side. Then the other side will schism.


f4e8e3  No.745563

>>745178

>he Archbishop of Canterbury

Isn't the Queen/King in theory the pope of the Anglicans?

Where does the Archbishop fits in?


f03b66  No.745794

>>745169

They actually looked into it early on afaik but were surprised to learn that Mary was venerated in the Orthodoxy as well so droppppped it


5656da  No.745809

>>745563

Yes, the English Monarch is the leader of the CoE, but they appoint an Archbishop to run it for them. It's just a way to delegate the responsibility away from the royal family.


f4e8e3  No.745811

>>745809

So the royal family is just there for church ceremonial purposes?

What if the queen wanted to stop the gay stuff in the CoE? Could she do it?

And what if the queen became Catholic or of other religion?


2720c0  No.745812

>>745118

I can agree with that, especially since most of what Lancelot Andrewes Press (Western Orthodox publisher under the AOCANA) produces is reprints of Anglo Catholic materials, which I use in my daily stuff. Not to make a blog post, but I guess it shows that Anglicanism actually has preserved some stuff the Catholic Church lost after Trent.


fa3342  No.745819

The monarchs who established Protestantism in England received instruction from Reformed ministers.


5656da  No.745821

File: 46439077855adf5⋯.jpg (12.2 KB, 220x302, 110:151, Wenzel_Of_Liechtenstein.jpg)

>>745811 (checked)

>So the royal family is just there for church ceremonial purposes?

Ehh, if you want to look at it that way you can. I see it as thr monarch owns the land and the souls of the English

>What if the queen wanted to stop the gay stuff in the CoE? Could she do it?

She could always fire the current Archbishop and appoint a new one. But she is a globalist whore, so I wouldn't expect that to happen until her and Charles (the current Crown Prince) passaway. I'm not sure if Prince William is a globalist or not rumor has it William confronted the Queen and Charles about Diana's death. Supposedly he is the new Crown Prince

>And what if the queen became Catholic or of other religion?

LMAO never gonna happen. unless you go up agianst the Anglo-American world order and get prince related and the royals of Liechtenstein on the English throne


f4e8e3  No.745831

>>745821

>I see it as thr monarch owns the land and the souls of the English

Me too that's why I think mocharchs should intervene more in the governing of the country.

>William confronted the Queen

Well it was her mother and the Queen and his dad didn't like her.

Wasn't she cucking Carlos with some dudes? I get the impression that she was an whore, correct me if I'm wrong and I apologise if I am.

>royals of lichtenstein on the English throne

soon


63770c  No.745849

File: e2bb3a887b5b1c8⋯.jpg (43.18 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, maxresdefault (2).jpg)

>>745831

>Me too that's why I think monarchs should intervene more in the governing of the country.

I agree, but I see why they appoint the Archbishop. The Monarch can't be in two places at the same time. Like how the owner(s) of a company appoints CFOs, CEOs, COOs to run the various divisions of a company, so too must a Monarch appoint other people to run the other divisions of a nation.

>Wasn't she cucking (Diana) Carlos with some dudes?

I heard that rumor aswell. I heard she was fooling around with a saudi prince and carried his baby. She had to be killed as to not have an islamic bastard ruin the prestige of the family. I personally think she was killed because she was going to expose the globalists like JFK was (RIP) and Charles wouldn't have any of that.

>soon

If you madlads can pull it off, more power to ya. But I see a Cromwell 2.0 rising to power before that happens.


f6741b  No.745854

>>745850

the legitimate line was broken in 1066


89051b  No.745855

>>745809

>Yes, the English Monarch is the leader of the CoE

Temporal leader.

The archibshops are the chief honchos with apostolic succesion, that can therefor administer sacraments and appoint priests, which is what the Church IS, in Apostolic theology.


63770c  No.745856

File: 06e41367e41f4c6⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 84.24 KB, 586x800, 293:400, william.jpg)

>>745854

William the Conqueror did nothing wrong


f4e8e3  No.745879

>>745849

Are you saying Diana was "redpilled" somehow?

She never seemed patriotic to me to fight the globalists.


63770c  No.745883

File: bf5853dc366dcc3⋯.jpg (36.41 KB, 678x381, 226:127, prince-charles-savile-pedo….jpg)

>>745879

Uncovering pedophila in the UK government will do that to ya.


f4e8e3  No.745889

>>745883

I didn't know the brits had pedo problems in the government.

Well considering that it must be likely that the driver took a (((wrong))) turn in the tunnel.


fb64a6  No.745897

File: ccd59a32f041349⋯.jpg (34.02 KB, 615x409, 615:409, Prince-Andrew-and-Jeffrey-….jpg)

>>745889

Dont get me wrong, the (((FakeJews))) do play their role in pedophile rings across the globe pic&link related Jeff Epstein and Prince Andrewz . But it us more the (((synagogue of Satan))) than Moshi the bagel pusher that are the problems.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/prince-andrew-sexual-relations-underage-4908702


b975cb  No.745898


63770c  No.745906

File: a00200a9e49865f⋯.jpg (85.74 KB, 1024x576, 16:9, 22without-jews-there-would….jpg)

File: 8de2a942c4817ef⋯.jpg (49.77 KB, 600x686, 300:343, putin-on-jewish-bolshevism.jpg)

File: 60928285fff6d68⋯.jpg (158.47 KB, 1174x738, 587:369, bolshevik-jews.jpg)

File: 2d91b6afa7f9191⋯.jpg (12.53 KB, 220x248, 55:62, genrich_grigorijewitsch_ja….jpg)

>>745899

I usually try to red pill people on the orgins of (((communism))) and the horrors it brought. That gets normies to our side fairly quick.


4acb53  No.746047

>>745906

This!

Underrated post, they say that religion is communism biggest enemy, because people turning to god avoids them following a totalitarian regime. And when people are devoid from god, they turn to communism as a form of resolving their problems.

Anyway, there was another thread talking about this in more detail, which was it?




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ausneets / christ / hydrus / misr / sw / tenda / vg / vichan ]