1fcb61 No.738907
what does this board think of the book of enoch?
287880 No.738911
>>738907
Jewish = satanic = bad
0c389a No.738913
1fcb61 No.738916
>>738913
>>738911
the OT is made by jews though.
287880 No.738918
>>738916
The old testament hebrews weren’t jews judaism is an invented religion that came after the fall of the 2nd temple. Modern judaism comes from the traditions of same pharasies that crucified christ and rejected his divinity.
1fcb61 No.738922
>>738918
the book of enoch wasn't written by modern jews.
Why pol loves to blame everything on their boogeymans?
287880 No.738923
>>738922
/christian/ isn’t /pol/ and it isn’t a boogyman only jews accept the book of enoch as valid
a15d71 No.738926
A book we should know about, but its nothing we should draw theological implications from.
c48890 No.738927
Interesting as a historical document, but otherwise not really noteworthy. Why do you ask, OP?
>>738911
>the authors of Enoch = Satanic
>the authors of Enoch are the same as the authors of the rest of the OT
>therefore the authors of the OT are Satanic
You're not very smart, are you lad.
>>738923
>only jews accept the book of enoch as valid
Not sure why you raised this point considering that OP isn't claiming Enoch should be included in the canonical scriptures.
1fcb61 No.738928
>>738926
>>738927
I just read that there's evidence in the book of enoch for the existance of souls in dogs.
e0a47c No.738929
They won't let us have sex with farm animals.
c48890 No.738930
>>738928
>evidence
What are you talking about? If a claim is contained in a book it is not "evidence," rather a "claim" or a "proposition." Is English your second language?
>souls in dogs
All living beings have souls, though the souls of plants, animals and humans are qualitatively different, naturally.
>>738929
>random comment
>no source
>not a reply to anything
>makes no sense
You need to leave.
1fcb61 No.738931
287880 No.738932
>>738927
>implying the book of enoch is written by a prophet
>implying the book of enoch is divinely inspired
>implying the book of enoch is a part of the canon of the church
>implying the book of enoch doesn’t come from the pharasies that crucified the Christ
the authors of enoch were pharasies not prophets unlike the rest of the old testament
66de8a No.738935
>>738930
I think you need to hang yourself with a belt because God hates you that's why you needed to create laws to destroy people's lives for having sex with animals because He wouldn't do it for you, you had to do it all yourself like youll hang yourself with a belt. No faith bad religion you're garbage just like every christian who swears on the Bible in a lesser kike court of law.
b6cf53 No.738936
>>738923
>>738922
https://orthodoxwiki.org/Book_of_Enoch
Whilst this book does not form part of the canon of Holy Scripture for the larger Christian Churches, various groups, including the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, regard parts or all of 1 Enoch to be inspired Scripture. The currently known texts of this work are usually dated to Maccabean times (ca. 160s BC).
c48890 No.738937
>>738931
>dumb conspiritard YouTube video
No. That is not a proper source of information. Too many posters here do this and it's absolutely insane.
That being said, I don't know why you posted this video. The Book of Enoch is not sacred scripture and therefore, beyond its importance as historical/mythological document, has no relation to Christianity at all.
>>738932
The BoE was written by the same culture and people (speaking generally) that produced most of the OT. What's more, it was known by many Church Fathers and it even used by some of them as evidence for the coming of Christ.
>pharisees not prophets
This is a redundant dualism considering the fact that the former was a sect, or a movement, whereas the latter is a calling by God and cannot be considered an "occupation."
>>738935
>unironic schizoposting
May God save your soul, pagan.
1af1db No.738938
>>738916
The Jews (Yehudi or Yehudim of the tribe Yehuda or Judah) were only one tribe of Israel. Everyone before then would not be Jews. Many of the people after that as well were also not Jews. For example, Paul nee Saul was of the tribe of Benjamin.
b6cf53 No.738939
>>738938
> Many of the people after that as well were also not Jews. For example, Paul nee Saul was of the tribe of Benjamin.
For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly…
1fcb61 No.738940
>>738937
what the church considers cannon in the bible is what the vaticans wants you to believe.
would you believe mainstream media today just because is the official version?
c48890 No.738941
>>738940
Pray the Jesus Prayer tonight. It may help ease your anxious mind.
1fcb61 No.738942
>>738941
from what I can tell, the book of enoch is about the prebiblican angels who had children with women, the nephilim.
There's some evidence of fosil records where they found giants on some places on earth.
b6cf53 No.738943
>>738940
the bible is a series of books, without a table of contents or an authoritative body to decide what goes in it you are left to your own devices and whims to pick and choose what is spiritually inspired and what isn't.
287880 No.738944
>>738940
>comparing the mainstream media to the bride of Christ
do what >>738941 said
1fcb61 No.738945
>>738944
>>738943
I don't necesarelly believe God only revealed to only the jews.
I do think God's have appear several times to diferent peoples to teach their truth.
I do believe Buda was another incarnation of jesus.
75b602 No.738946
>>738940
The Vatican didn't choose the Canon.
I think you need to read Tobit, it's about the medicinal power of the Church. Please do it, it's very short.
287880 No.738947
>>738945
repent of your heresy or go to >>>/fringe/
5ebc37 No.738948
>>738923
No they don’t, the Jewish scripture is the same as the Protestant Old Testament but rearranged and mixed up. The only people who accept Enoch as valid are Ethiopian Orthodox
1fcb61 No.738950
>>738947
I'm agnostic who reads gnostic books.
b6cf53 No.738951
>>738945
>buddha was an incarnation of God
something he never claimed nor believed.
>I do think God's have appear several times to diferent peoples to teach their truth.
Then God is incoherent and full of deception and contradictions. Go be a homoperennialist somewhere else.
1fcb61 No.738953
>>738951
I do think God and truth is the sun light, but every religion is a part of his wisdom, in the sense that red and blue, even while diferent both are part of the same light.
15d706 No.738954
>>738907
If you'd hang around long enough, you'd know. This same question is asked every 12 hours or so.
b6cf53 No.738955
>>738953
The sunlight is harmonious, while the world's religions are not harmonious with each other; fundamentally they are saying different things about God, morality and the afterlife and they claim God has said different/contradictory things when stacked against each other.
Bad analogy. Who taught you this nonsense?
1fcb61 No.738956
>>738955
because the situation is much more complex than what the bible tries to teach you.
but if you ever mention stuff like the demiurge christians will try to burn you alive.
b6bdab No.738960
>>738953
Other religions worship the fallen ones and are not
part of God's light!!
974fdb No.738967
>>738907
It thinks OP is still a fag.
b6cf53 No.738972
>>738956
Why would God incarnate and deliver fundamentally different messages to the world? Instead of delivering fundamentally the same message each time, but with superficial differences? He's literally lying when he tells Christians that they can only go to the Father through his incarnate Son and his action on the cross, while telling muslims there is was no incarnation, there is no intercessor, he didn't die, there is no blood redemption, etc. Then he tells buddhists that God is basically irrelevant and they need to save themselves via their own effort in meditation and detachment. Then he tells Hindus that they actually are all little bits of God incarnate and that everything is God consciousness or someshit.
Where is the harmony? There might be a harmony within a religion and it's different denominations because they share the same fundamentals, but not across religions, there is no harmony in fundamentals there, only in very superficial things like certain virtues.
96fd48 No.738974
>>738956
Its not complicated at all.
It becomes complicated when you try to smash all religions into one.
c00a01 No.739032
>>738907
I heard the video game adaptation was OK
c48890 No.739151
>>738956
>le demiurge meme
1af1db No.739504
>>738939
The identification with the tribe of Judah doesn't make one of that tribe. It was mostly political.
9a10a3 No.742956
9a10a3 No.742960
>>738953
Lad there can be only one true religion. If you are a Christian you must believe it because Christ himself who is True Man and True God said so.
All the other religions as the OT tells us as well as the Christian tradition is that the other gods are demons.
So a Jew, a Muslim think they worship God but in the end of the day its Satan they worship. When they refuse to acknowledge God as he is they are friends with the devil.
Hindus, pagans, and the remaining polytheists are just worshipping demons larping as Zeus or shiva.
9a10a3 No.742968
>>742965
Not everything one it was false.
You can even see that on some apocryphal gospels. There are some that tell us imaginary stories about the infancy of Christ. It's not an holy text, it's a Christian fable, but still has a bit of truth.
The proto evangelium of James isn't canon as well, but somethings as the names of the parents of Mary can be assumed to be true.
9a10a3 No.742972
9a10a3 No.742975
Kek. I have to admit it was odd.