>>737271
>There is nothing the New Testament about this
St. Paul referred to the broader meaning of these laws against hybridization, and against yoking an ox and an ass to a plow (Deut. 22:10), in II Corinthians 6:14. . . . Unequal yoking plainly means mixed marriages between believers and unbelievers and is clearly forbidden. But Deuteronomy 22:10 not only forbids unequal religious yoking by inference, and as a case law, but also unequal yoking generally. This means that an unequal marriage between believers or between unbelievers is wrong. Man was created in the image of God (Gen. 1:26), and woman in the reflected image of God in man, and from man (I Cor. 11:1-12; Gen. 2:18, 21-23). “Helpmeet” means a reflection or mirror, an image of man, indicating that a woman must have something religiously and culturally in common with her husband. The burden of the law is thus against inter-religious, inter-racial, and inter-cultural marriages, in that they normally go against the very community which marriage is designed to establish. Rushdoony
Consider also acts 17:
<and He made from one, every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times, and the boundaries of their habitation, (Acts 17:26 NAS)
The very existence of the nation and God's separation of them implies that it's against God's intent to transgress the boundaries
This was the view of a US district court in 1964 before Loving v. Virginia in 1967:
>Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.
Even if it were only found in the old testament, you don't have to be a theonomist to glean God's moral instruction from Leviticus or Deuteronomy
For example, Leviticus forbids a threesome with a man, woman, and her mother
<'If there is a man who marries a woman and her mother, it is immorality; both he and they shall be burned with fire, that there may be no immorality in your midst. (Lev. 20:14 NAS)
Obviously we can learn from this that God doesn't like such an event, even if we aren't required to institute execution by burning for perpetrators
>the nations will not be undone by anyone
Agreed, the debate here is not the existential threat of white genocide but issues around individual cases of miscegenation
I reckon you agree that the propaganda campaigns to breed out whites in their home countries are wicked