>>725468
Leviticus is in the bible
Also, still moving the goalposts. The other anon quoted Romans 1 to prove they know God and they know what they're doing is wrong, not that they destroy to die.
>>725479
>In order to kill a homosexual to keep that law without breaking the law against committing murder you would need to be a perfect being
No, you would need to be a magistrate. Romans 13, God has established the rulers to keep justice on earth.
>You would need to be God. Is anyone here God? You cannot kill a homosexual without it being murder becuase you are not God.
Why didn't God follow your logic when He commanded men to execute sodomites for their crime against nature and nature's God?
>It's by faith that you are gradually redeemed (from glory to glory), not by works.
>Christ did not abolish the law (meaning it still stands) but fullfilled it: Meaning your salavtion comes through faith in his works not by your works according to the Law. The act of keeping the Law will not "get you into heaven" becuase you can't keep the law; you break it everyday.
Nobody in this thread is talking about salvation but you. But this does not mean your argument is irrelevant. No, I think you keep bringing this up to act as a cloak for your objection to what even you recognize we are actually talking about. You're condemning our preaching of the law because you think the gospel means the law is abolished and these abominations are no longer to receive the due recompense for their error. This is why you are justifying sin, because you are separating the law without which there is no repentance away from the gospel and defending unrepentant sinners from the punishment they deserve. The law is in full effect, and even the saints are required to keep it, because it is the emblem of righteousness.
>You no longer live under the Law but under Christ Jesus.
>You adhere to Christ in order to keep the law becuase he is the only one who has never broken a law.
This might be relevant if sodomites had any repentance in their hearts.
>So when I say "Christianity is a religion of faith" I am not saying "The Laws have been abolished". I am not preaching lawlessness.
Then why are you preaching it in opposition to preaching of the law? When I made a brief comment on the gospel, it was in harmony with your gospel, yet you keep going on. If it were really as you claim, you would be clearly tilting at windmills.
>What good is it to preach the Law without preaching the saving grace of Jesus Christ?
This thread is not about bringing sodomites to repentance, it's about what punishment they deserve.
>>725482
Of course I do, because it's not the abominations that have problems, it's those who take issue with them. People who find anus worthy of worship are clearly well adjusted.
>>725484
Again, you don't need the law to know something is evil. You need it to know something is sin (crime). They know by nature it's evil, they know it's an abomination, and they even know they deserve to die for it (and in this they revel), but without revelation they would not know it is sin.
>>725493
Correction: God gives rulers the duty to execute His wrath.