/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

I'm more interested by AI replacing humans as fit servants of God. To most, it is to replace a god. Either the public opinion or the ego. You see, the AI -if successful- will learn faster than any human or organization can lie to it.

AI is still bound to physics and would do its equivalent of dying, and if we found a way to keep an AI going literally forever, we already became God

>>723675

The only way such a ludicrous turn of events would happen is if the end of the world suddenly occurs either by some grand war or other catastrophe and humanity is forced to start over from scratch, and in 200 years their mutated descendants would probably start worshiping computers and nuclear missile out of desperation. But even in that scenario, an actual AI fully capable of independent thought is still in the realm of scifi.

>>723680

This is more likely in the advent of true AI.

>>723680

God wants humans to serve him out of their free will and not some robots.

>>723675

That is still far faar away.

I hole we will have a massive technologival regression in the next 100 years.

>>723693

Red heifer was born you idiot. It's going to get really wacky here soon.

>>723695

It was purposefully bred by Jews because they wanted the world to end.

>>723697

I don’t think tryhard forced signs count as anything of note.

>>723675

Do these people even understand how obviously evil they sound?

>>723695

>jews tempt God

>I am an idiot

funny

Dan Brown in the hood be like

Poo pee poo pee my tigga

The powerful luciferians have already a plan in motion.

AI replaces job, World war 3, millions of now useless people die, population reduction and control, nations destroyed, people desperate.

Then comes an antichrist to fix things, and people will follow him, and most christian churches will be fooled by him.

Fantasy:

>AI will make anime real

>AI will usher in a golden age

>AI will help man find God

Reality:

>AI is for spying on commoners for the benefit of atheist dictators and their ultra-elite banker buddies.

>>723675

>“Humanity no longer needs God but may with the help of artificial intelligence develop a new form of collective consciousness that fulfils the role of religion."

These people talk about God like he's just some comforting concept that can be mix and matched. They dont consider for a minute that he's real. They're atheists at heart.

Reminds me of paganlarpers who try to replace Christ with someone else to further their racial goals.

>>723704

>>723710

>>723882

>>723903

Remind me again why I should not bother with anything that Dan Brown says?

>>723675

I could see it happening. The so called atheists who accuse Christians of being blind in our faith are often completely hypocritical in their own blind faith in scientists and current technology. There are things about the universe that we know today that we didn't know one hundred years ago simply because we didn't have the technology to measure those things, and yet they still act as though their knowledge of the universe is vast.

>>724691

Well, for one he wrote the (((Da Vinci Code))), a novel where he makes a bunch of bullshit and historically innacurate statements and claims about Christianity and he says that all of it is 100% true and actually happened, but gives absolutely zero evidence research or anything.

So? Make disciples of all the Earth. For if we do is from God, then who can stop us, but if some rampant AI tries to stop us then it will be fighting against God. The fires of hell shall not prevail against the Church, whom shall we fear?

>>725229

>uploading your brain

I'm not becoming immortal since my I/self still dies and I'm forcing a soul-less machine to host a copy of my personality.

Why should I ever want to trap a copy of my fallen psyche into this hellhole forever?

>>725055

>a novel where he makes a bunch of bullshit and historically innacurate statements and claims about Christianity

Can you post a list of the many statements and claims that the Da Vinci Code said about Christianity? Never read that book and most likely will never will read it.

>he says that all of it is 100% true and actually happened, but gives absolutely zero evidence research or anything

So the Da Vinci Code is a poorly written fanfic about Christianity that was written by some dude that huffs at his own farts?

>>726337

Having read it (and the sequels, and Dan Brown's other books. I had no taste and was an atheist at the time, shoot me.) yes, pretty much all of his work is rubbish. Here's what I can recall off the top of my head.

- The Apostle John in Da Vinci's The Last Supper is secretly Mary Magdalene because no beard and longish hair = Totally a woman

- Holy Grail, through some Latin shenanigans, is reckoned as secretly meaning Royal Blood (san-greal/san-graal -> sang real), which then leads into:

- Jesus Christ married Mary Magdalene, went to northern Europe, and somehow founded the Merovingian dynasty of France because of some vague connection to fish with the dynasty's founder (Merovech).

I'd mostly purged the plots from my mind, but I drudged that up for you.

Uncle Ted was right.

BUTLERIAN JIHAD NOW!!!

yeah this might be true. people already worship "muh science", and so soon they'll believe that some AI can take in all the facts and understand the answer better than anyone else. all it has to do is like get some predictions right about 80% of the time, and then they'll believe everything else as if it's gospel. technology has to play in somehow with end times.

>People will worship AI idol

So you mean web 3.0 is going to be just like web 2.0, but with AI?