>>676732
I believe that beauty can be defined as a 'whole or partial reflection of God'. Beauty itself is, therefore, not a emotion as much as it is a perception of the transcendent divine. Instead, what we feel when we perceive something beautiful is either love or lust: a desire to give, or to take respectively.
This is why a woman can be beautiful, as can a painting, a musical score, or even an idea or dream. All these things have within them reflections of God, and we feel inclined to respond to it.
As Christians we are called not to take, but to give - that is to say, we are called to love. Perfect love is the love of God - that which we are called to. I suppose that love itself is therefore a beautiful insofar as it is a whole reflection of God's grace. Consequently, lust cannot be considered beautiful, as God exhibits not selfishness.
This isn't to say that sexual attraction is evil; rather, it is how we act on it that is categorizes sin: husband's and wives should sacrifice themselves to each other, precisely as Paul writes in Corinthians 13:4-8:
> Love is patient and kind; love is not jealous or boastful; 5 it is not arrogant or rude. Love does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; 6 it does not rejoice at wrong, but rejoices in the right. 7 Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. 8 Love never ends; as for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away.