>>664619
>No, it's only since the 60s that such ideas have been consistently applied
Oh really, so a business has freedom of speech and freedom to hire who it wants? A school has freedom of religion so that prayer can openly be allowed? No, it turns out the official state religion of judeo-secularism is the only allowed religion now. The one that believes in climate change, etc.
>which is why they seem so suddenly to have become so devastating.
No it's because they were blocked up by the "civil rights" which are actually unconstitutional in the US. There is no "protected groups," under the law; that's nonsense and absurd. It's just many jewish judges deciding among themselves who gets "protected" status.
>Anyone who believed sincerely in FoS and FoR pretty much believes it in the manner I mentioned and that only (((dialogue))) and (((reasonable debate))) are the ways forward.
No because it used to be you could just create a party and exclude the people you disagree with, but now, as "protected groups" they must be included by law. Otherwise it will inevitably be described as "disparate impact" and the court then forcefully disbands or strikes down whatever you were trying to do. Considering what outsiders run the courts, they shouldn't have that power. And they didn't, until the "civil rights" came into existence in the 1960s with progressive, biased judges getting into the courts. And guess what, they didn't have the same beliefs as the vast majority of the people they ruled for, giving this result.
And as I explained earlier, FoR has been violated because right now only the state religion of judeo-secularism is openly allowed. Anything contrary to it is discriminated against by the courts, and subsequently, anyone else in bondage to them. Before that a person was at least allowed to hold their religion in the public sphere, regardless of the consequences. The only part separation of church and state originally played was that no religious test was required for state office; the 1960's changed that into creeping, state enforced judeo-secularism.
>Assuming you are American, does your country even look vaguely Catholic in morality or character?
Considering that Catholicism teaches dual covenant in regards to the so-called jews, yes it is in effect pretty close with the other zionists, Especially these days.