Whats the deal with this topic of historical Jesus and biblical Jesus? What is this about?Ive seen it talked even here a few times but im too busy to read it and then lost it.

Email
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: c2fcc2f5e6e01b2⋯.jpg (11.33 KB, 300x223, 300:223, c2fcc2f5e6e01b2f1a873bcd46….jpg)

Christanon 06/14/18 (Thu) 17:09:49 b1370c No.661364

Whats the deal with this topic of historical Jesus and biblical Jesus? What is this about?

Ive seen it talked even here a few times but im too busy to read it and then lost it.

Christanon 06/14/18 (Thu) 18:47:06 7346cd No.661431

It's what skeptics say to differentiate between Jesus as a historical figure, aka Jesus, the charismatic rabbit born of second temple judaism, that preached his famous sermons, and got killed by romans, all of which can be inferred from historical records, and Jesus the Messiah, Word made flesh of the Gospels, with all the attributes christian theology gives to Him.

More or less.

Christanon 06/14/18 (Thu) 18:47:42 7346cd No.661432

>>661431

meant to say Jesus, the charismatic rabbi.

Christanon 06/14/18 (Thu) 18:48:14 7346cd No.661433

>>661432

heh, we have a word filter for the hebrew form.

Interesting.

Christanon 06/15/18 (Fri) 00:18:14 b1370c No.661578

>>661433

>>661431

Oh thanks, laugh at the rabbit typo though

Christanon 06/17/18 (Sun) 03:39:05 c1c1e7 No.662366

>>661431

super skeptics take it a bit further, saying that historical jesus is completely unknowable from the accounts we have (biblical and otherwise), and so even if historical jesus did exist as a person, he might as well not have because nothing we know about him in the gospels at all is true.

This is a position of "soft" mythicism, where basically, sure, a man jesus existed, but our conception of him is 100% myth.

Christanon 06/17/18 (Sun) 04:02:33 b9ab6c No.662370

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>661364

This video does a good job of explaining it. It specifically talks about Reza Aslan's book "Zealot" but it's applicable to many of these "historical" deconstructions.

Christanon 06/17/18 (Sun) 15:42:21 e31b65 No.662512

Atheists can't even agree wither Jesus actually existed of not

Christanon 06/17/18 (Sun) 15:52:42 16c872 No.662516

>>661364

>Whats the deal with this topic of historical Jesus and biblical Jesus?

A ecumenicist seminary school distinction their money men have recently made them reinforce that they use to stack the clergy of the larger denominations with modernist heretics. Specifically its an attack on apostolic churches but it will rot the others just as well.