f59288 No.643014
Celibacy has skyrocketed to record levels among men.
Are we witnessing the dawning of a new golden age of monasticism?
7e1aeb No.643015
No it means men have become faggots who watch anime and play video games while women have become whores
e72ec3 No.643017
>>643015
This, dysfunction superficially mimicks virtue sometimes.
96f1fb No.643021
>>643014
Men are checking out of society, just wait until VR gets perfected and refined with immersive sex toys. Without the men that grease its cogwheels civilization is going start flirting with a collapse.
It's just a sign that bad things are coming, prepare yourselves accordingly.
023b02 No.643025
>>643021
>>643014
St Anthony seems highly relevant here
“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, ‘You are mad; you are not like us.'”
06e647 No.643032
>>643014
>0% of women are celibate for 2 years in a row.
That PHYSICALLY makes no sense.
Even if you simply add people that can't have sex, for one reason or another(nuns, women with medical conditions, super unlucky chicks, and girls that are just super ugly, crazy radfems, etc.) should raise some percentages.
Also, you are taking a deleted tweet from some statistician that actually has some profound statistical explanations and constantly comes back to correct his data.
https://twitter.com/lymanstoneky
Stop believing in cancerous shit to fuel your "incel redpill" fantasies.
06e647 No.643033
>>643015
>>643021
Stop taking stuff at face-value, and dig into the data.
53707e No.643036
d3a68d No.643046
6b16c8 No.643047
>>643032
>>643033
What country is this data supposed to be based on? How is this data observed?
>>643015
In Egypt and Northern Africa in general I believe, rates of celibacy amongst males is increasing as well. It seems to be a phenomena that extends outside the West. But the whole irony of it all is watching the older people complain about how degenerate this generation is when shit like the Sex Revolution and use of recreational drugs like cocaine and heroin doesn't make an impact on this current gen.
fdb1dc No.643048
>>643014
Lol those are incels and pretend volcels. These people are the most disgusting people youd encounter when it comes to vices.
t. Wizard apprentice
06e647 No.643070
>>643047
>What country is this data supposed to be based on?
America
>How is this data observed?
It's taken off the Census and the ACS.
Look over his tweets.
He explains the methodology and sources from time-to-time.
4d6c10 No.643076
>>643015
Pretty much, we've gone full circle.
4d6c10 No.643077
>>643032
Estimated vs reported.
b981ee No.643078
>>643014
>Are we witnessing the dawning of a new golden age of monasticism?
Or are we witnessing the affects of liberalism allowing women to be promiscuous and always choose from the top 0.1% of men while the rest of us are stuck here putting up a facade and calling it celibacy.
e9b078 No.643079
>>643015
Yep. With women becoming whores we can't have kids or kids with proper father figures, which gives great advantage to competing nations, and gives Islam a fertility edge over the West.
4480ea No.643080
>>643032
>>643014
>celibate
>people who haven't Winnie-the-Poo'd in the past year or two
< monasticism-on-hold
Men are just hooking-up less.
It's not chads/incels. Instead … Welcome to the Hikikomori generation.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/photography/proof/2018/february/japan-hikikomori-isolation-society/
https://www.nippon.com/en/currents/d00332/
06e647 No.643084
>>643078
>affects of liberalism allowing women to be promiscuous and always choose from the top 0.1% of men while the rest of us are stuck here putting up a facade and calling it celibacy.
Yeeah…no
e9b078 No.643086
>>643080
Because sex is part of a reproduction ritual. It's innate for males to instinctively seek a woman to settle among his flings.
If whoredom is so rampant, and male can only have flings, this kills one of the biggest motivations for male to seek sex with females.
06e647 No.643089
>>643086
>If whoredom is so rampant, and male can only have flings, this kills one of the biggest motivations for male to seek sex with females.
Except the same sexlessness affects japanese women.
A large part of the origin of the phenomenon in Japan, and increasingly in the West, is an absolutely toxic working society and rising costs of living, and people interacting less in general, which is absolutely poisonous for marriage and raising kids.
I'm not defending the Sexual Revolution, but people placing the blame on women only, out of bitterness, are just as retarded.
There are massive societal changes involved, as well.
e9b078 No.643094
>>643089
>I'm not defending the Sexual Revolution, but people placing the blame on women only, out of bitterness, are just as retarded.
This is not about "blame" on the moral sense. It's about cause and effect.
If my car is not working well because of a certain piece, I have to acknowledge that the mentioned piece has a problem.
If I just say the problem is generalized to the whole car and not focus in any piece in particular as to not hurt the screwdriver feelings, I can do that, but the price the mechanic will ask me will be so much higher.
8f0c84 No.643100
>>643014
>>643032
>So your girl might have funneled a hundred dicks in her lifetime but she hasn't taken one in the last year so everything's fine!
>>643047
>older people complain about how degenerate this generation is when shit like the Sex Revolution and use of recreational drugs like cocaine and heroin doesn't make an impact on this current gen
This kind of stuff is important to notice. The current wave of degeneracy is the ripening of things that happened on their watch. Things are bound to get strange by comparison once their cultural deathgrip on our society is broken, and we can finally start undoing the damage.
e9b078 No.643103
>>643100
Yep. Only when it's generalized for promiscuous women to be in their 40s-50s without any family bonds, or respectful relationships with opposite sex outside work, will the feminist "have sex with everyone in sight" will be start to be questioned.
We have to wait until this system exausts itself. Ride the Tiger, rather than fighting it.
06e647 No.643114
>>643094
>If my car is not working well because of a certain piece, I have to acknowledge that the mentioned piece has a problem.
And if your car is a aging rustbucket, and you focus on the radiator only, your car is gonna crap out under you regardless.
Stop acting like a reactionary version of those crazy SJW that think everything wrong with society is due to the Patriarchy, or rape culture, or white people or whatever.
I mean, did you even read the articles?
Those guys were clinical shut-ins, born of a winnie the poohed up japanese work society(and it's not even the first time such movements have arisen in Japan, though it's never been as ).
Trying to tie them in your narrative makes no sense.
Once people started interacting with them, they became somewhat normal again, and one guy even married the girl that came to reintegrate him into society, and went on to help other hikos get back on track, as well.
e9b078 No.643126
>>643114
>And if your car is a aging rustbucket, and you focus on the radiator only, your car is gonna crap out under you regardless.
Well you used the terms "aging rustbucket", so you already agree that this is a system that is depleting itself naturally.
Self-removing problem. The problem is it takes a long cycle.
Seeing the blame on females has nothing to do with sexist, but rather Equity. What do I mean with this?
Males are already blamed for everything, in pop culture, articles, misoginy, blamed for war, genocides, and all ilnesses, and they just endure it.
Females at the slighest accusation start to flip and start whining it's unfair.
No it's not unfair. Given the terrain, analysing the problems in femalesphere for what they are is not sexist, but rather holistic.
8f0c84 No.643129
>>643103
>Ride the Tiger, rather than fighting it.
Christianity has always had a form of spiritual judo at its core. After all, we've seen how many empires into their graves at this point? As far as I'm concerned this nonsense is just all the more reason to stick to the women within the faith. Exogamy pollutes the Sacrament of Matrimony anyhow.
5af0f4 No.643132
>>643129
>all the more reason to stick to the women within the faith. Exogamy pollutes the Sacrament of Matrimony anyhow.
At the risk of sounding like a redditor, "This".
And remember men, she doesn't have to be a supermodel. She just has to be a real Christian.
a20b07 No.643136
>>643126
>Males are already blamed for everything, in pop culture, articles, misoginy, blamed for war, genocides, and all ilnesses, and they just endure it.
So "im gonna go full retard in the opposite direction out of butthurt"
Got it.
dbbc35 No.643140
>>643014
Does not mean anything, it means more incels and hikki and neets. Also an old saying. Men lie about not being a virgin, women lies about being one.
349c79 No.643160
>>643015
>men have become faggots who watch anime and play video games
What do you expect me to do, wife up a whore?
Maybe, just maybe, men are having less sex because they're tired of this promiscuous bullshit that's CURRENT YEAR and therefore are opting out of society.
>>643032
>Even if you simply add people that can't have sex, for one reason or another(nuns, women with medical conditions, super unlucky chicks, and girls that are just super ugly, crazy radfems, etc.) should raise some percentages.
These exist indeed, but do not show up on statistics because they're so rare and probably seldom picked out of a random population.
What this means is that if multiple statistics say that there are 0% virgin women in the 22-25 category, the actual existing virgins between ages 22-25 are statistically insignificant.
In short, they have become anomalies that will mess up your statistics rather than make them accurate for a general population.
06e647 No.643260
>>643160
>These exist indeed, but do not show up on statistics because they're so rare and probably seldom picked out of a random population.
It should nonetheless generate some percentages, or atleast a blip on the graph.
But the whole thing is pointless.
Lyman said it was a math error, and the actual graph is the one i shared >>643032 but people seem to ignore that stuff, being too busy circlerjerking themselves over "womynfolk are whores" posts, so why do i even bother?
ba4187 No.643279
>>643014
It isn't voluntary. Besides, most men throughout history didn't even reproduce, while 80% of women did. Simple as that.
349c79 No.643332
>>643260
>It should nonetheless generate some percentages, or at least a blip on the graph.
That's the whole thing, if they were significant enough to appear in statistics and thus at least show a blip there would actually be something.
0% in statistics mostly means insignificant amounts of a data.
This was my entire point, non-CURRENT YEAR women are so few and rare they have become statistical anomalies.
4ac6b6 No.643335
How do we fix women, Christanons?
290b2c No.643339
ba4187 No.643340
>>643339
Because women have no agency and it is up to men to control every aspect of their behavior.
290b2c No.643341
>>643340
It's the responsibility of the man to lead.
689e95 No.643342
>>643335
By fixing yourself.
8b51b7 No.643343
>>643015
>while women have become whores
You're right about that atleast. We are witnessing the end of the social agreement between roasties and betas which entailed that the beta provided resources in return for access to sex with a female. This was the basis for the institution of marriage throughout history: The betas toiled, and with their resources, they compensated for their lack of sexual appeal, and made themselves attractive to the roastbeef that they wanted to mate with. It's important to note how absolutely essential this pact is to functioning society. It's why we're so wealthy in the 21th century. But the roasties have had enough. In the age of feminism, sound wisdom and common sense no longer have any effect on the weaker sex. They want Chad, and noone but Chad. After all, he makes their nether regions tingle. In the modern welfare states, a paradigm shift has occurred. They can now substitute the hardworking betas for daddy government and get the resources without having to stomach needing to associate with, and pretend to love, the unfortunate betas. On their end, the betas are waking up to the fact that their position in society has become miserable. They've always been the work-horses, but they used to get something in return. In the past, if they were successful, they could expect a reasonably chaste virgin girl to marry. Not anymore. Now they get berated by misandrist feminists who want them to apologize for their existence. And because of this, betas are now checking out of society and going their own way in massive numbers. They've sized up the work/benefit ratio of a normie life and come to the conclusion that 2D waifus and video games is the better option. Of course, this is a total disaster for the West.
8b51b7 No.643352
>get back in line or hide under a rock, you dirty male virgins
023b02 No.643355
>>643352
Kek, people are insane these days. Was there ever a sane time?
6c0c61 No.643356
>>643340
I know you're being sarcastic, but let's not pretend it isn't true.
e72ec3 No.643360
>>643357
Surely you mean before the fall. After the Fall we have Cain having God Himself telling him to not murder his brother and he goes and does it anyway.
e72ec3 No.643363
>>643033
Why does the female line in the first graph decline so much compared to the male line? Was the dip due to divorced men marrying previously unmarried women?
6b16c8 No.643375
>>643343
> 2D waifus and video games
I'm going to be that guy and say you're not thinking outside of your circle. 2D Waifus and video games isn't a thing amongst those groups and well, Japan. Think of pornography and IG thots. That's what men are getting hooked on.
6b16c8 No.643376
>>643375
Shit, video games is a common recreational activity but it isn't what they're only doing. There's a section that's just shitposting on social medias like Twitter and Facebook or eating junk food all day doing nothing.
8f0c84 No.643377
>>643363
Usually bizarre behavior like that in these kinds of datasets are due to irregularities in how the data is collected rather than a change in what's being observed.
ae8a52 No.643382
>>643335
They aren't broken. They are as they have always been.
We need to fix our laws back to when women had the rights of children. No work and under a legal guardian. Because they are children mentally.
They mentally can't handle the stress and responsibility of a full legal and work life, it is actually a horrible thing to do this, again, much like it is to children.
No one defends child labor as a good welfare law, so we shouldn't defend woman labor.
56c2e1 No.643385
>>643377
Gee I wonder what happened in the forties that lead to a lowering of the mean marriage age
7e85c3 No.643436
>>643114
I live in Japan and the average working day at my office is 14-18 hours a day 5 days/week (for an officially 40 hours/week job). If you want a real job in Japan you have to be willing to give up your entire life for it. If you want any free time at all you have to take a job that doesn't pay enough to actually survive on. The cost of living here is high. You can't survive on your own off a minimum wage or parttime job. That's why people give up and live off their parents. The choice is either work 60-80 hours/week or be a neet with no real option in between.
4480ea No.643461
Peer, o mere mortal, into western society's future
being this >>643436
>>643086
>it's all womens's faults
>>>/mgtow/
47c97a No.643481
>>643260
>but people seem to ignore that stuff, being too busy circlerjerking themselves over "womynfolk are whores" posts, so why do i even bother?
Yeah, it's pretty sad. It's annoying how everyone likes to ignore facts to pat each other on the back about how correct they are and how wrong everybody else is. The Posts that directly follow your are a good example. >>643335
06e647 No.643484
>>643332
>That's the whole thing, if they were significant enough to appear in statistics and thus at least show a blip there would actually be something.
Even if they were single digits, or fractions of a percent, they would appear.
And as i said, they do appear, but you WILLFULLY CHOOSE TO IGNORE THE REAL DATA.
>This was my entire point, non-CURRENT YEAR women are so few and rare they have become statistical anomalies.
Look at the corrected graph.
They are 8-9% of the female population.
Men are a few percentages higher, as has always been the case for these types of statistics, from sex to reproduction, for as has long as we have collected this data.
But as i said, you faggots willfully ignore the real data, and cling to bugged-up graphs even the author has deleted from this tweet timeline, and word-of-mouth urban myths like >>643279
, because it feeds your narrative.
7743a5 No.643493
>>643014
>get reported at work for "looking like an incel"
>get fired
bestest timeline
eb229a No.643494
>Are we witnessing the dawning of a new golden age of monasticism?
In the same way that the Soviet Famines in the Ukraine ushered in a golden age of temperance and defeat of gluttony
349c79 No.643531
>>643484
>Even if they were single digits, or fractions of a percent, they would appear.
That's the whole point, 1/1000 or 1/10000 would not appear on a graph.
>And as i said, they do appear, but you WILLFULLY CHOOSE TO IGNORE THE REAL DATA.
I know they exist, but their appearance is statistically insignificant.
That's the whole shocker.
>Look at the corrected graph.
What's the difference between the two graphs in terms of population?
I mean why was the first one deleted?
56c2e1 No.643537
>>643436
Are you in Tokyo?
70caa5 No.643544
>>643531
>That's the whole point, 1/1000 or 1/10000 would not appear on a graph
0,0something% of anything is too low a number for ANYTHING in a population, beyond weird genetic stuff.
>I know they exist, but their appearance is statistically insignificant.
Its 8-9%.
If that percentage was an ethnic minority with a political party in a country, itd be used as a political kingmaker.
>What's the difference between the two graphs in terms of population?
Its literally the same population, you dumbass.
>I mean why was the first one deleted?
Weird calculation error, and the author prefered not keeping a wrong graph on the internet, to be mistakenly sourced.
(USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST) 76d01d No.643614
>>643089
>placing the blame on women only, out of bitterness, are just as retarded.
This is true. Women are influenced by men. We cannot run away from our duty to the Lord by claiming that women ruined the world when we ourselves ruined it.
Genesis 3:11-12
And He said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?” The man said, “The woman whom You gave to be with me, she gave me from the tree, and I ate.”
e9b078 No.643805
>>643461
>le social shaming tactics
>in an anonymous discussion
this is you spot the "christian" feminist
e9b078 No.643806
>>643614
Those points seeing women as an acephalous animal without accountability, or even less accountability that a child has of its parents, simply to escape guilt;
Is on the level of being sold snakeoil.
No thanks. Bible is very clear on guilt of women even in -Original Sin- and you guys say that women dindu nothing.
Just don't come misquoting the Bible in such a Luciferian way
e9b078 No.643807
>>643806
PS - quoting Bible to illibate women of -Original Sin- is a new level of White Knighting. This is you spot "Christians", who deny Original Sin if only to "please women".
Removing Dogma because it hurts women's feelings? Really?
a7459b No.643815
>>643014
To all the incels that think they can never find a woman to love them:
>Job 40:7
>Gird up thy loins like a man: I will demand of thee, and declare thou unto me.
190536 No.643820
>>643806
>women as an acephalous animal without accountability
>less accountability that a child has
Have you ever met a woman? The most intelligent woman I ever met, IQ over 140, completely abandoned all her beliefs and agreed completely with some random dumbass because she fancied him. I doubt the dumbest man in the world wouldn't abandon his beliefs because some woman he fancied disagreed.
They have no real spine or conviction in their beliefs, read the Bible sometime.
8b51b7 No.643821
>>643461
>if you say that women are at fault somehow, this triggers my feminist indoctrination
>irrational response that doesn't really address his argument
>reasoning like a woman
>being a gynocentric white knight/roastie
>>>/leftypol/
6b16c8 No.643855
>>643821
Nice projection. He didn't say anything but one line. What's with you people thinking everyone is either against you or completely on your side? You people need help
6b16c8 No.643857
>>643820
>Have you ever met a woman?
The real autism is thinking everyone online is your same sex and looks like you. Seriously it's funny. Then assumptions are made about your character that couldn't be further from the truth when you do reveal a tidbit of your identity even on Social media.
54549e No.643858
>>643820
>What is literally the Fall of Man
8457b3 No.643860
>>643537
Yep, close enough.
>>643815
Those loins are going to stay girded for an awfully long time. 😂
e7de19 No.643886
It's due to paganist modern society and female hypergamy.
06e647 No.643935
>>643820
>I doubt the dumbest man in the world wouldn't abandon his beliefs because some woman he fancied disagreed.
You realise there's a word(in french, iirc) for precisely that?
>They have no real spine or conviction in their beliefs
Pick up a saint calendar sometimes.
>read the Bible sometime.
Yeah, just limiting ourselves to the NT, we have the Myrrhbearers, that visited the tomb, while the Apostles were scared.
Kandake, that was visited by Philip, and would help evangelize Ethiopia.
Dorcas(Tabitha), that was an important pillar of the community.
Claudia, mentioned by Paul.
The enduring faith of old Lois, and her daughter Eunice.
Lydia of Thyatira, the first european convert.
Julia and Nereus's sister.
Persis - a "woman who has worked hard in the Lord"
Priscilla, the wife of Aquila, mentioned in numerous tracts.
"Joanna the wife of Chuza Herod's steward, and Susanna, and many others, which ministered unto Him of their substance."
etc.
And that's not even getting into the women of the post-biblical early church, which had a huge part, and deserve a chapter of their own.
Or do you wanna call all of these gals spineless whores, as well?
7e1aeb No.643938
>>643160
Lmao found the anime watching faggot
protip: men are leaders and should take the lead. If women are morally corrupt, it's because "men" like you allow it
2d5f79 No.643944
>>643886
>female hypergamy.
That's been a thing since women were women.
56c2e1 No.643945
>>643860
>Yep, close enough.
I don't know if it's also the case in Japan, but usually living in the countryside is much, much cheaper. Have you considered moving?
2d5f79 No.643946
>>643938
This. Men in western society have no grip over their women
8457b3 No.643957
>>643945
I live in a city in Saitama Prefecture, which is what the Japanese consider hillbilly country. It's still close to Tokyo by train, though. The problem with the cost of living in Japan isn't so much location, since rents and mortgages even in Tokyo are dirt cheap (maybe 30% of my home country's), but rather fees, bills, insurance, taxes, food (besides rice lol), and transportation. Living in a city here is probably cheaper than living in the countryside in those terms, even if the rent is a bit higher here, mostly because you don't need to maintain a car in the city. Anyway, life here is within my budget as long as I don't have to move every year, but I'm worked like a dog.
dd5e5b No.643958
>>643938
>>643946
So what are you suggesting, let's go out and just bust into nightclubs and break knees of every girl there? Or when they have a one night stand, track them down and make them chew the curb?
They're free and if they choose to act like they do, I respect it more than manipulating a woman into servitude and living in a charade. I honestly can't understand how can you respect a woman whom you manipulate. If a woman, on her own accord, can't conclude sex and alcohol are bad, what in the hell would you want to have anything to do with her?
You think women didn't go for romps in the hay? They did the same exact shit as women today, it's just that they did it in secret.
2d5f79 No.643965
>>643958
I'm not suggesting that. It starts with your fathers There needs to be a shame mechanism and at least a PROJECTION of a monogamous household. These are instilled values that carry over child forever. You think kids with single moms or dads or moms that look like they are cucked, or cuck, make kids who behave better? There was one for me. That's why I only had sex with one man and that's my husband.
dd5e5b No.643975
>>643965
That's all well and good, but women are hivemind prone. When they go to college and get into a girl posse, dad is very far away.
2d5f79 No.643981
>>643975
again, only if they're retarded. most people are retarded. big whopus. stop putting your faith in people. have loyalty to yourself, your loved ones, and god only
06e647 No.644036
>>643975
>That's all well and good, but women are hivemind prone. When they go to college and get into a girl posse, dad is very far away.
You aren't dealing with Tyranids here, anon.
e9b078 No.644112
>>643938
The first step in leadership is to delegate responsability to your subordinates.
If your subordinates are not held accountable for their actions, they cannot grow as people.
Therefore, anyone who ilibates women of all responsability, (including illibation from Original Sin! quite the ((christians)) here), is a failure in leadership.
The General holds the Colonel and the Major accountable.
The Colonel doesn't just go "I dindu nuffin the leader is the General" after a screwup.
All this "women dindu nuffin" is self evident that there is quite a big amount of guilt requiring penitance.
7e1aeb No.644114
>>643958
It starts in ths family. Men dont care their sisters and daughters go to clubs and get railed constantly. Men go out and do that with girls and normamise that behaviour. Some of your problems are your own fault, you cant go around blaming others forever.
>>644112
>this amount of mental gymnastics to justify anime
e9b078 No.644117
>>643820
>They have no real spine or conviction in their beliefs, read the Bible sometime.
Ben Sira, which might be the most heavy in judging women says you're selling snake oil.
-Everyone- inherits Original Sin. If women have no accountability, that means they don't have responsability for Original Sin, while Males get the Double the blame for the Fall. Which would mean non-sense.
Never understimate the Women. The Woman acts in the shadows, and has quite a lot of subterfuge power. They are cunning.
Just because Male is the leader, does not the Woman is morally acephalous. Just because one is the General, does not mean the Brigadier is mentally incapable.
There is a lot of sin and penitence that need to be done.
No one wants to marry a whore. The only exceptions are the assumed whores, who acknowledge their fallen nature and one day end up marrying a lonely billionaire. But even in such cases, the literal prostitute admits her sinful path and mistakes, so why can't a normal woman?
e9b078 No.644118
>>644114
>using anime shaming on -*chan-
>being clueless about original sin
Both a Goon and someone Biblically illiterate. You sure told me.
60771e No.644122
>>643014
This is terrible. I have two kids and a happy marriage. How are my children suppose to find functional, healthy spouses when they grow up? People are becoming so isolated from each other it's frightening. Technology and specifically social media is ruining us. Or rather, leftist indoctrination loads the gun and social media pulls the trigger.
e9b078 No.644123
>>644122
You the married man, as the leader, believe that woman are dumb people uncapable of moral judgement?
Because this is the meme that is being shilled lately.
e9b078 No.644127
>>643356
That is literally what Muslims believe. Christianity differentiation of the sexes is correct, but forcing people to be moral goes against Free Will and is what Muslims do.
55e47e No.644129
>>643015
>No it means men have become faggots who watch anime and play video games while women have become whores
The latter is true, but the former is merely an effect of the latter. Women are biologically attracted to only 5-20% of men- this is regardless of what the other 80% of men do with themselves, because the women perceive them as being of low genetic quality and thus as being unworthy of procreation. In the past, this was not a problem, as our society functioned well with traditional marriage and patriarchal institutions. But nowadays there is feminism and women are permitted to ride the Chad cock carousel with no repercussions aside from realizing that they're going to die alone when they're 35-40, and by then, it's too late.
The solution, of course, is Islam-style forced marriage of lolis, wifebeating, strict dress code, and stonings for the worst offenders.
3f8c9c No.644131
>>644123
I don't get, is being that a bad thing?
8f0c84 No.644132
>>644122
Have you considered encouraging them to marry a Christian? Don't underestimate your ability to influence them, particularly if you've been a good father. Also why would you let them use social media? There's literally no benefit to doing so, it's just a vice.
>>644129
If you want to argue biology then slags not reproducing means that there won't be slags in a couple generations. Same with homosexuals now that there's no pressure for them to marry.
3f8c9c No.644138
>>644132
Genes only represent trends not absolutes.
I'm sorry for your brain damage.
1c8cc0 No.644141
>>643014
>yay celibacy
>Are we witnessing the dawning of a new golden age of monasticism?
Is your spirit animal a panda, or something?
e9b078 No.644147
>>644131
No, you really didn't get it. I was just asking what opinion do you have on your wife, do you consider her:
1) your partner capable of moral judgement
2) a dumb person uncapable of moral judgement
Which is a rethorical question of course, made to show the point to people who say that Women are not mentally capable of being morally accountable and in their conclusion all the blame is exclusively on the males.
I was not attacking you.
e9b078 No.644149
>>644138
Regardless slags not reproducing will have an
effect even if not absolute, that people who value sex for reproduction will end up better represented on gene pool.
8f0c84 No.644151
>>644138
>Genes only represent trends not absolutes.
Hrm… who do I trust, the random shitposter on the internet or the more than a decade I've spent studying at the graduate level the heritability of behavior and self control…
The heritability of life outcome stands at about 87% in human populations. Among the remaining 13% there are about 6% that will escalate in their degeneracy and inevitably require constant state intervention until they expire, and 7% who will build all the nice things that our descendants will take for granted as inherent to a functional society.
55e47e No.644158
>>644132
>If you want to argue biology then slags not reproducing means that there won't be slags in a couple generations.
All women have a natural inclination to be slags, it's only through the influence of powerful men that they become adequately tame.
>Same with homosexuals now that there's no pressure for them to marry.
>implying homosexuality is genetic
8f0c84 No.644164
>>644158
>implying homosexuality is genetic
Well it is to a certain degree, same with alcoholism, low self-control and the like. Each can be exacerbated by developmental problems. The idea that they are somehow exempt from being held responsible for their behavior or that it is somehow beyond their control is, of course, absurd. If homosexuality was some kind of fag toggle switch then the phenotype would never have come to be expressed in the first place. The popular conception of "DA GAY GENE" as some kind of sodomite master control unit is retarded beyond words.
06e647 No.644167
>>644129
>Women are biologically attracted to only 5-20% of men
I just love how redpill fags took a tiny bit of an okcupid survey, ripped only the part of their analysis on women that suited them, ignored the same part about men, added the 5% thing out of their ass, and then extrapolated a minor study into a frikking LAW OF BIOLOGY.
>>644158
>Same with homosexuals now that there's no pressure for them to marry.
So men have a natural inclination to be gay, given the social opportunity?
8f0c84 No.644169
>>644167
>So men have a natural inclination to be gay, given the social opportunity?
Not quite, see my post above. Some are, just as some have a natural inclination towards violence, or laziness, or self-aggrandizement, etc.. That mankind is naturally inclined towards sin should come as no surprise to anyone here. And just like the virtues are not distributed in equal measure, neither are the vices.
e9b078 No.644171
>>644158
Homosexuality is genetic at least in the same sense that people with a family historial of drunks is more likely to be drunk, family with an historial of schizophrenia is more likely to be schizo, or historial of depression is more likely to be depressed.
06e647 No.644172
>>644164
>The popular conception of "DA GAY GENE" as some kind of sodomite master control unit is retarded beyond words.
The reasonings are hilarious, though.
>Well, the genes is nature's way of dealing with reproduction when overpopulation happens;
>Well, non-reproductive individuals helping raise the tribe's kids is a great evolutionary strategy;
They are literally adding excluding yourself from passing your genes for the greater good, which is the exact opposite of how natural selection works.
The only place where that happens is in eusocial animals, and well, those types tend to be large families where Haldane's kin selection comes into effect.
The fact they are placing this in small prehistoric tribes is even more retarded, since homosexual individuals wouldn't have enough people in the tribe to find "mates" with.
>>644169
True.
Just wanted to make sure.
I might add to that that homosexuality is also used as a powerplay thing among males(prison sex, submissive guys being more feminine, sexual abuse creating identity doubts among some, etc.) and you have some interesting pathologies coming into play.
b99aee No.644508
>>643335
National Socialism, but with Christ.
9f2637 No.644522
>>644508
So Codreanu and the Legion than…right?
8b51b7 No.644665
>>643957
>I'm worked like a dog.
What do you do for a living? Are you happy in Japan with a qt wife?
a974f4 No.644701
>>643014
This includes married couples if you're wondering why female is literally 0%. I'll post the unmarried version when I have time if I remember
017417 No.644742
>>644522
Spain could probably be an example too. How is Codreanu's book, have you read it? I've been meaning to pick it up.
e0d134 No.644751
>>644742
My summary of the book
Fantastic. It's Codreanu's Mein Kampf.
if you ever ask yourself "Why is the far right so angry at the j*os"?
This book documents that anger every Romanian felt at the time and the steps he took to construct his Legion.
Its a different perspective on the same anger Germany felt during the Global Economic Depression era
DEMOCRACY YES!
8b51b7 No.645154
Bump. There's a better option, lads.
290b2c No.645155
>>645154
Dude, you post in every single thread shilling for your azn fetish.
78607e No.645158
>>645154
>dude just marry a pagan lmao
8b51b7 No.645160
>>645158
Lots of Christian Asians, dude. Tens of millions just in China.
>>645155
No, I don't. You do realize that there may be more than person here that doesn't like white thots, right?
290b2c No.645166
>>645160
Ok dude I'm not going to sit here and argue with you all day. But seriously, if one of your primary motivations for asian women is because it makes "white thots" angry (as your image implies) then you may need to rethink your position. Especially because you are a Christian (I'm assuming) and our motivations should not be out of spite or hatred, but out of charity and love.
I'll pray for you.
e29f6d No.645199
It's not monasticism. It's an intensification of the current vicious cycle.
>women have become whores who regard purity as something to be hastily discarded rather than preserved
>'predatory' men (I say 'predatory' not to mean perverts or paedophiles, but simply men who, having no regard to chastity or decency, take advantage of rampant women to get a nut off) have sex with these women, encouraging the behaviour
>'good' (that is, earnest and hardworking) men are repulsed by whorish women and intimidated by the competition of predatory men
>women, having no 'good' men to preserve themselves for, spiral further into whorishness
>the cycle repeats
8b51b7 No.645217
>>645166
>But seriously, if one of your primary motivations for asian women is because it makes "white thots" angry (as your image implies)
You've got it wrong, dude. The fact that white women abhor AF/WM pairings is just a nice cherry on top of the already tasty cupcake. I like Asian women because they make objectively better wifes/girlfriends. They're great.
>spite or hatred
It's just a harmless meme.
290b2c No.645220
>>645217
>The fact that white women abhor AF/WM pairings is just a nice cherry on top of the already tasty cupcake.
See this is what I'm talking about. I'm not even convinced white women even care what you do, but why would it even matter to you?
>They're great.
No relationship is great if it's based on spite or fetishism.
56c2e1 No.645250
>>645217
>I fall for propaganda
Cool
048d7e No.645293
>female celibacy
>0.00%
line up for end of civilization grief councelling
048d7e No.645294
4ba9c8 No.645312
>>645294
But neither is he a boy.
Back, when he was a little girl in France, they used to pick pretty daisies. The boys from the village would whisper his name. "Anon, oh Anon! Why don't you show us the fine [SORRY SIR, THIS IS A CHRISTIAN BOARD. THAT MEANS NO SWEARING]?"
Post last edited at
13100a No.645341
>>645158
Many asians are Christians and numbers are growing, despite the c*mmunists trying to stop it.
e9b078 No.645371
>>645154
The best part of this picture isn't the picture, but the replies it generates
8b51b7 No.645376
>>645294
>>645312
>man up and marry the white thot
290b2c No.645380
>>645376
>Anon, spite and fetishism are unmanly and un-Christian.
<REEEE stop forcing your white thot on me! RIDF DETECTED!!!
Here's your (You).
8b51b7 No.645382
>>645380
I was pretty much just quoting them, anon. Also, what has my supposed fetishism to do with my post? You know, every single person on this planet has racial preferences in regards to who they want to date. You do, I do, everyone does. Your attempts to pathologize this perfectly natural and healthy behavior reeks of dishonesty, to be quite honest. Very un-Christian behavior.
a4c853 No.645490
>>643084
You realize that pic you posted agrees with what you're replying to right?
e58a96 No.645519
3c4d7d No.645916
>>645490
not the same anon but, how so?
06e647 No.646312
>>645199
>'good' (that is, earnest and hardworking) men are repulsed by whorish women and intimidated by the competition of predatory men
So many assumptions in your story, it's painful.
>Women being one thing, and no difference in environment, personality, or groups that they are interfacing with;
>unlucky men being some "going sexual Galt" tier revolt, and not just being the final tenth of the male population, that sucks at this stuff;
>them being necessarily earnest and hardworking, and not also being filled with neets and weirdos;
>no women ever traversing the same path, or feeling any disgust towards society, or meeting some good guy;
Nah, man, i'm pretty sure you aren't the hero in this.
>>645293
It's the wrong graph, you dud.
7920fa No.646341
>>643089
"Sexlessness" is not something that is affecting western women, they are having sex at rates higher than possibly any population has experienced in all of human history. What even is this white knight bullshit?
8b51b7 No.646342
>>646312
The genders are not the same, you brainwashed normie. Go back to your gender studies classroom.
425c73 No.646355
>>645294
>le weak babyman can't handle stronk huwite womyn post #431619
Feminists should go back to Reddit
06e647 No.646371
>>646341
>"Sexlessness" is not something that is affecting western women
But i wasn't talking about western women.
I was talking about the Hikikomori, which is a problem of specifically japanese cultural origin, while this faggot was trying to tie it into his "rebellion against whores" narrative >>643086
>they are having sex at rates higher than possibly any population has experienced in all of human history.
Source?
>>646342
>The genders are not the same, you brainwashed normie.
Of course not, but mgtowist narratives turn them into some weird alien species, which is just as retarded as "i'm a strong independent glamorous businesswoman single mom that's just like my male partners"
Trust me, i actually have made a pretty big critique of career women, absolute gender equality, the sexual revolution, delayed and lowered natality, etc. and can actually show you some studies to make a reasonable dismantling of all bullshit, but i can't stand these primadonas that turn themselves into wannabe victims and brave martyrs, uncritically swallowing urban legends and debunked graphs(you can be sure OP's pic will be splayed all over the internet by MRA's, pick-up artists and co. for atleast a couple of years), just as much as i can't stand "men are all rapist pigs, see this weird study from some obscure blog that shows 90% of women have been victims of sexual abuse. Also, remember women make 0.5 cents for every dollar a man makes" feminist crap.
Both are cancer, and hope they hook up, because they deserve each other.
7920fa No.646416
>>646371
>Except THE SAME sexlessness affects japanese women
>i wasn't talking about western women
Yes, you were, and you know you were. You're not fooling anyone, Stacy.
>Source?
Pic related is all you're getting from me, because unless you've been living under a rock for the past 60 years, I don't believe your professed ignorance is at all genuine. This isn't a poorly documented phenomenon, and it's easily researchable with a few google searches.
7ae7ac No.646686
>>646416
>Yes, you were, and you know you were.
What the heck?
How is a phrase where the main subject is JAPANESE women, in the context of hikos, actually be about western women?
Learn reading comprehension.
>You're not fooling anyone, Stacy.
>everyone who disagrees with me is a woman(specifically the meme version in incel fantasies)
Nope.
Know what dangles between my legs.
Also, thanks.
Ill get called 2 more terms, and ill win mgtow bingo in this thread.
841bca No.646688
>>643855
this times ten quintillion
And this pic >>646371
you, sir, are a hypervigilant idiot >>643821
>>643805
ohhhh, boo-hoo, did babee get offended because I called him mgtow?
Grow up the pair of you. All the world's problems are not thots, and men share the blame for making them thus.
841bca No.646689
>>646686
>Ill get called 2 more terms, and ill win mgtow bingo in this thread.
25e29a No.646700
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>643820
>They have no real spine or conviction in their beliefs, read the Bible sometime.
Now, now, I firmly believe that you can manipulate a great majority of women into any way you want, because that's their suppressive nature, but do not forget that even women can make their men weak. Just reading the story of Simon and Delilah, shows that Simon broke his Nazarene oath because he couldn't endure the endless nagging of his wife. Or Ahab, how he was completely influecend by his wife Jezebel, took the same gods as her and basically did to her bidding as she pleased.
And never mix up "muh IQ points" with integrity, mate. If IQ points would bring us integrity then Western countries wouldn't become 3rd world shitholes. There are also good examples of women, like the Amish women in vid related at 18:09.
04024b No.647094
>>645220
Happily in a AF/WM relationship here. I…didn't know that this was a thing. As long as you find an ACTUAL Christian girl (not the slutty college faker kinds) you'll be the happiest you'll have ever felt, regardless of race.
bda117 No.647095
ebfe30 No.647118
It's just excess men who wouldn't reproduce anyway being eliminated from the pool by women. It's pretty funny to me how some people are trying to spin this whole thing into a 'celibacy revolution'. Women won't even notice you're gone while they're forming harems around some dude.
And it's even funnier how men take solace in old war books and dream of some I don't know which ideal. What, you're gonna go get your head blown off for women who rejected you and men that put you down?
469248 No.647131
>>647118
This situation is going to lead to the collapse of Western civilization. Muslim Arabs probably would have conquered the entire world centuries ago if they weren't polygamists, leading to huge numbers of incels that destroyed their empires at their height. Let it burn, I say.
ebfe30 No.647136
>>647131
Let it burn indeed. I'm not getting shot at to defend those people. Nor am I defending anyone I see being attacked by an immigrant.
140a09 No.647141
>>647094
Annoying faggot with man?
140a09 No.647143
>>647136
See you in hell buddy
ebfe30 No.647147
>>647143
I owe nothing to anyone.
140a09 No.647164
>>647147
Mark 12:30-31
You can't possibly be this illiterate
ebfe30 No.647174
>>647164
Love thy neighbor =/= get shot in the face for your neighbor.
06e647 No.647190
>>647118
>while they're forming harems around some dude.
Real life isn't a hāremumono, people(and yes, i had to look it up what it was called)
Well, except in those weird breakaway mormon sects, or some fat guys in the ass end of Africa.
ebfe30 No.647193
>>647190
Oh really, than how come only 40% of men that existed in the human history reproduced, while 80% of women did? Magic?
140a09 No.647196
>>647174
John 15:13
Stop posting any time
ebfe30 No.647202
>>647196
I have 3 friends and sure I would help them.
If you think you have the moral obligation to give your life for people who deliberately made poor choices and save them from consequences, be my guest.
76d01d No.647213
>>647118
>Women won't even notice you're gone while they're forming harems around some dude.
Why does this matter? Is this going to matter when we're judged by God? I don't want to drink from the cup of urine and feces that has been brewed in this century. Does that make me an inferior man? Are you an alpha male because modern women want/notice you?
ebfe30 No.647216
>>647213
You misunderstand. I am not talking about celibacy which is motivated by spirtuality. I'm talking about celibacy which stems from not being successful with women so oh I guess I'm celibate now and look, even more people have the same problems so they're celibate too so I can take comfort in that.
It is a God given urge to want to share your life with a woman so yes it's important. It's one of the fundamentals of human existence and experience. If you can comfort yourself by thinking about the afterlife, that's fine. For some people, that doesn't ease their suffering.
140a09 No.647218
ebfe30 No.647220
>>647218
I'm fine with facing the consequences of my actions and I hold the others to the same standard.
>spend years advocating for immigrants
>demean and ostracize people who oppose it
>get attacked by an immigrant
>other people have the moral obligation to help
or
>society rejects and isolates someone
>society proceeds to ruin itself
>people rejected by the society have a moral obligation to defend that society
Yeah, no.
140a09 No.647221
>>647220
In time you'll realize nobody can use the correct approach to everything, because that would require studying 25 hours a day. Protect others with your knowledge, and tell them to do the same.
ebfe30 No.647224
>>647221
I'm talking about protection in the sense of physically have to defend the society, defending the people that rejected you. And I highly doubt a women's studies Phd chick will 'protect me with her knowledge'. Again, there is no moral obligation to save people from the choices they made willfully, deliberately and to the best of their knowledge.
140a09 No.647225
>>647224
Those are exactly the errors we need to protect others from because there is no way to avoid them. An error made in good faith is the greatest tragedy of all.
ebfe30 No.647226
>>647225
Hey, if you want to spend your life saving others from themselves, go all out. However, there's no moral obligation to do it.
140a09 No.647233
>>647226
Can you say you love others if you don't want to protect them from what hurts them the most?
2412d0 No.647238
>>643014
I don't know why you guys are ignoring this
>0% of women are celibate
140a09 No.647241
>>647238
I don't know why you haven't read the thread
0d19ba No.647289
>>645293
>line up for end of civilization grief councelling
he's late, but i don't blame him for not wanting to come here.
>>643493
racial profiling hidden with constructed words and controlled context.
>>643860
>Yep, close enough.
>living near tokyo, formerly edHOE home of Ieyasu
move to the country you dum-dum, and shingen should of kept eating meat.
1601e3 No.647292
>>643938
Leading women has been made illegal. If you so much as raise your voice to your wife, she or your neighbors call the cops and you get to spend the night in jail, coming out with a permanent record that prevents employment. If at any time she doesn't like any of your decisions, she can leave you and be financially rewarded by the court system and socially rewarded by feminists telling her "you go girl!"
We cannot control our women until we take back the legal and social system from our (((enemies))).
https://weddedabyss.wordpress.com
https://blog.jim.com/economics/patriarchy-and-fertility/
e9b078 No.647300
>>647118
>It's just excess men who wouldn't reproduce anyway being eliminated from the pool by women.
Except it's not, the dudes "not getting removed" aren't breeding anyway, due to massive use of contraceptive and abortions.
The only ones breeding are the immigrants, including muslim immigrants.
e9b078 No.647301
>>647300
meaning, Chads and Staceys are NOT FERTILE.
Which is the theory does not hold.
Even the Chad is getting destroyed in divorce courts and having a fertility subpar and bellow the immigrants one.
06e647 No.647336
>>647193
>Oh really, than how come only 40% of men that existed in the human history reproduced, while 80% of women did?
Because yet again you are believing incel urban legends, not facts, you imbecile.
Even mgtow.com had trouble sourcing that idiotic meme.
There are some tabloid article studies that suggest some lopsided ancestor gender ratio(which i have some serious doubts about, due to multiple biological reasons), but even those place this shit in prehistory(before the agricultural revolution got popular, iirc), not after.
ebfe30 No.647339
>>647336
https://www.livescience.com/47976-more-mothers-in-human-history.html
>For much of human history, a greater proportion of women in the population reproduced relative to men, they found. This means "that even though there may be equal numbers of males and females in a population, a larger proportion of the females than the males are reproducing," Stoneking said.
But oh wait you have concerns, whatever shall we do?
ebfe30 No.647344
>>647336
>https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/21/11/2047/1147770
>Our data do not suggest that differential natural selection is the cause of this difference in TMRCAs. Rather, these results are most consistent with a higher female effective population size.
>For instance, Shen at al. (2000) observed an approximately 5:1 ratio of autosomal to NRY variability in their global survey of nucleotide variation. This observation differs significantly from neutral expectations based on a one-to-one breeding ratio but is extremely close to the expected results given a breeding ratio of two females per male (Hedrick 2000).
76d01d No.647397
>>647292
>We cannot control our women until we take back the legal and social system from our (((enemies))).
I don't know when that's going to happen. If modern promiscuous/fornicating women were to find themselves alone when they're at old age then the world might take notice. If that doesn't happen then I might begin to look forward to the collapse of Western civillization.