>>646097
>babylonian/chaldee isn't dead
Of course not captain obvious, the entire false state of (((israel)))/babylon points out otherwise.
>>637247
>What's the christian perspective on intrusive thoughts?
Exodus 20:17
>Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
romans 7:7
>What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
james 4:5
>Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy?
Lust is not a sin because except covetousness had been a sin we would have not known of its existence. That and if our spirit is in sin then Jesus death on the cross is meaningless because He only died once for sins hebrews 10:12,22,26.
james 1:13-15
>Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man:
>But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
>Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.
matthew 5:28-29
>Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
>But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
Now that said, do not let "lust hath conceived" or "to lust after" happen as that implies you are already coveting the thing and have decided to go after it. Once that decision, the "conceived" or "lust after" part is fullfilled, then it is sin. Until that decision to covet/lust after, lust itself is just revealing that covetousness in your heart and is not a sin thereby. Other parts of the Bible also re-enforce this idea such as romans 6:12
>Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof.
romans 13:14
>But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof.
1 corinthians 10:6
>Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted.
Don't lust after evil things of the flesh, but rather good things of the Spirit galatians 5:17
>For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.
1 corinthians 14:39
>Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues.
<but anon other versions then the KJV say completely different things on this topic
<such as God being subject to "sexual immorality" which is just another way of saying how society as a majority FEELS about what sexuality is acceptable
>Instead of WHAT God SAYS IN THE Bible
Either make the tree good and his fruit good or make the tree corrupt and his fruit corrupt, for the tree is known by his fruit matthew 12:33. Show me a version other then the KJV that wouldn't make God a liar titus 1:2 if it were true that I might use the good fruit of to build doctrine out of. Or f-u-c-k off with your versions and fruit that would make God a liar if they were true.