>>635159
>>635210
Yes, Rama was a sedevacantist and the fact is: he gave lectures on the history of the church for 5 years in a FSSPX seminar.
In this interview with R. Coomaraswamy (in Spanish) he confirms he lectured for 5 years and that he departed because "Lefebvre wanted to deal with the modernist church". http://www.svabhinava.org/friends/JoaquinAlbaicin/RamaCoom-Spanish-frame.php
On the other hand, in this Brazilian article, a friend of one of the 4 consecrated bishops by Lefebvre states that R. Coomaraswamy thought there for 5 years, got 9 priests into sedevacantism and was then expelled by Lefebvre.
http://permanencia.org.br/drupal/node/1912
R. Coomaraswamy was Schuon's right hand in the mariyamiya tariqah at the same time he was teaching in the SSPX seminar.
There is another brazilian who was member of mariyamiya and who states R. Coomaraswamy spoke directly to him that "Lefebvre is an idiot, but he works for us". The same brazilian who now affirms that the end goal of Guenon and Schuon is the islamization of Europe.
I don't have reasons to doubt him, although he was wrong about the 4 bishops ordained by Lefebvre being tutored by Rama, but then again he had direct contact with Schuon and Rama.
In English there is this trying to debunk Rama and Malachi (who is another controversial person): http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2008/12/rama-coomaraswamy-and-great-game.html?m=1
Who ordained Rama and Malachi? One can find even informations about Malachi being in fact a bishop under disguise, even though he had a wife. (what vows did he keep from his Jesuit ordination?)
To sum up: Catholic traditionalists accuse Rama Coomaraswamy of intentionally causing schism and confusion (which got him expelled by Lefebvre), while a former associate of Schuon accuses Rama of serving Schuon's order to disrupt the catholic movement.