/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

Like an AI that would act as some sort of spiritual father? Pretty darn heretical.

it might be funny to see an apostolic AI argue with a prottie AI for eternity tho

>>629036

>How heretical is this?

Depends on how seriously you take its advice.

I really dislike this meme that people only disagree because they don't know the Bible enough. The educated people on all sides know the Bible well, they fundamentally disagree on exegesis

>>629036

Sounds like it'd just be a talking reference book, as it should be. So long as it strictly analyses, and adheres to, all implications and logic derived from the NT, then consulting it doesn't sound inherently heretical.

Still, really consider who would make such an AI. Truly consider who would stand to gain the most from an AI that provides answers, which people would believe, to questions regarding scripture.

>>629058

I wrote a program that can translate Greek and Latin and give multiple definitions for every word. Making it do analysis sounds hard though.

>>629036

>How heretical is this?

Its not heretical, its outright retarded.

>>629036

If we're looking at it as a Markov-Chain bot for comedic value, it's hilarious.

If we're looking at this for an answer to our questions, it's terrible.

>>629081

Someone already did that with a KJV and some coding books.

>And thou shalt put into the heart of today’s IBM mainframe operating systems.

>commutativity of addition is a single theorem because it depends on the kind of unholy rapport he felt to exist between his mind and that lurking horror in the distant black valley.

>Investigate the shell’s here documents and Python’s triple-quote construct to find out the Almighty unto perfection

>>629089

Kek, got a link?

>>629090

http://kingjamesprogramming.tumblr.com

>>629036

Satanism level of heretical.

They are trying to disfigure humanity by uniting us with technology, they want us to become reliant on it in a spiritual, economical and biological level.

>>629109

All trees are fine except the one of the science of what is morally good and morally evil. We’re not allowed to break the rules of our God given morality or change it, and having a robot dictate our morality could easily be used as a (((proxy))) to do just that.

That sounds like a great idea. We need a catchy name for it, though. We could call it the Best Exegesis Analytical Systematic Teacher. Maybe we could have some kind of wearable or implantable interface device?

>>629220

So an implantable mark of the B.E.A.S.T AI system? WCGW?

>>639828

An A.I is not the beast nor the image of the beast. Because revelation 17:8

>The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

>The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend

>they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is

What fits the description of something that was, and is not, and yet is, and yet can be spoken of in the future tense of "shall ascend"? If you determine the answer then you found the beast.

We already have it, its called TempleOS

Would it be heretical like cloning Christ from the Shroud?

>>639850

I sure hope you're not repeating that hologram bullshit.

The *correct* phrasing is "Was, and is not, and yet will be". IE walked the earth, was cast into the Abyss, and will rise again as per Revelations 9.

>>639895

Probably, but given the strange things that happen to instruments used to examine the shroud, I feel like it might not work anyway.

>>639899

Wait, what happens with the instruments?

>>639918

According to the research team that most recently examined it, some electronic instruments would not function when used on the shroud.