Sequel to The Passion of the Christ

Email
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Flag
Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 16 MB. Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 189b91e30b6276e⋯.png (261.19 KB, 540x554, 270:277, 1517296939817.png)

Sequel to The Passion of the Christ Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 20:22:52 294edc No.596568

>Caviezel, 49, confirmed he will reprise his role as Jesus in the planned film about the resurrection of Christ. "There are things that I cannot say that will shock the audience," he says. "It's great. Stay tuned."

>"I won’t tell you how he’s going to go about it," Caviezel says. "But I’ll tell you this much, the film he’s going to do is going to be the biggest film in history. It’s that good."

ARE YOU READY FOR THE DEPICTION OF THE HARROWING OF HELL

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 20:26:24 f867db No.596569

I haven't seen the Passion of the Christ yet, but I will, seeing as how it was made by arguably the only true Christian man left in that disgusting Hollywood. I've heard the movie was amazing. If Mel can pull through with Ressurection in a time like this, when nu-communists are trying their hardest to destroy our faith, I will be beyond surprised and joyful.

Hopefully we see both Heaven and Hell.

God bless you, Mel Gibson.

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 20:35:23 beff67 No.596575

>>596568

>ARE YOU READY FOR THE DEPICTION OF THE HARROWING OF HELL

That would be pretty cool

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 20:38:22 6a291c No.596579

>>596569

Even if the movie doesn't look good, go anyway. Support the man. They'll be doing their best to try to bury it.

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 20:41:06 33f799 No.596584

File: 6fd720e64f4f679⋯.jpg (39.09 KB, 604x601, 604:601, 655e7594bd2bcac73816d2ad7a….jpg)

I can't wait to mine all the salt from my friends who despise both Gibson and The Passion (in both film and non-film form).

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 20:49:18 2c5b60 No.596587

I haven't seen passion of the Christ yet.

I heard some describe it as torture porn etc so I kinda lost interest.

But I might be lead astray by salty nones.

Is it that needlessly bloody or is it what we know?

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 20:52:45 33f799 No.596589

>>596587

There's a degree of drama and even exaggeration during a few scenes, but it's a movie so it's expected. It's very good though, probably one of the better films Gibson has directed and a solid interpretation.

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 20:54:49 2c5b60 No.596591

>>596589

Well I am a sucker for drama.

Thank you brother.

I'll give it a try.

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 20:55:51 294edc No.596593

>>596587

Pope John Paul II said for the mobe that "It is as it was." The film is terribly violent, but only because it faithfully reproduces the last 12 hours of Jesus's life. This means that the whipping, crown of thorns and carrying of the cross are all in and uncensored. Regarding the wounds that Jesus takes, they were made exactly the same as what's recorded on the Shroud of Turin.

Even when Jesus's flesh gets ripped during the whipping, it's taken from the Shroud because the wound was there. The movie is quite literally as it was 2000 years ago.

Gibson said his goal was to make people realize how big of a deal crucifixion was because he (and I agree with him), people are desensitized by it because the story is told too often. And he succeeded.

>>596589

>exaggeration

I'll need some citations for that.

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 21:19:59 eda093 No.596601

File: 3149f883f4f5eff⋯.png (776.74 KB, 1047x706, 1047:706, ClipboardImage.png)

Based Mel is going to make movies Christian for once.

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 21:27:43 2399d6 No.596605

Cool. But what about the issue that Caviezel is 49 and playing an eternally 33 year old man? Maybe they will digitally de-age him.

By the way, check out Youtube for a recent interview of Mel Gibson by Joe Rogan. They don't get into religion and it's mostly Mel shilling for the non-fetal stem cell treatment which is prolonging his 99 year old dad's life. Still a good watch.

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 21:45:51 beff67 No.596620

>>596579

>Even if the movie doesn't look good, go anyway.

This is how quality dies

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 21:54:09 14ef73 No.596624

The not scene I didn’t like in this movie was the third on the cross getting his eye plucked out by a crow. That sort of stuff grossed me out. Other than that, it was great, and the “torture porn” complaint was made by atheists who couldn’t criticize it for other reasons (any time they make a religious movie, atheists criticize either its acting or its historical accuracy. They couldn’t say that here, so these people who consume blood and guts horror movies criticized it for being gory). Hell, South Park criticized the movie for being anti-semitic and gory. South Park makes a career off racist jokes and a show where a character gets brutally murdered every episode, but suddenly The Passion is too much.

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 21:56:50 c990dc No.596626

File: 4e046a9f5baaead⋯.jpg (135.68 KB, 960x858, 160:143, 4e046a9f5baaead1b80df5e914….jpg)

>>596568

This ones, on my list to go out and see it. But anyone else gona go see the one about paul coming out this march?

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 22:01:26 c990dc No.596629

>>596624

Well, i guess that's the way it works annon. Some ppl are brought fighting , and screaming into the house of god. Others go down fighting with the attitude of, God, i never needed you!, I never wanted you!

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 22:02:05 88d659 No.596630

>>596605

they cast 30 year olds as high schoolers all the time lol

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 23:00:51 1b2411 No.596658

>>596568

You guys seem to think this won't be shilled, I guess I'll take your word for it.

I'm guessing the movie will end with Jesus acending to heaven.

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 23:01:30 5f0085 No.596659

To this day I don't even know why Jesus went to hell instead of straight to heaven.

Particularly given the fact there's a permanent connection between him and the Father and being in hell is by definition not being connected to God.

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 23:06:52 7a9c02 No.596664

File: 6d4602b811dc150⋯.jpg (256.41 KB, 1013x1500, 1013:1500, paulmovie.jpg)

>>596626

It doesn't look very Biblically accurate…

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 23:08:25 933e5b No.596666

File: a468f2335b67969⋯.gif (2.84 MB, 636x346, 318:173, 198qj0pvzn5wqgif.gif)

>The movie is based on Acts

>yfw St Stephen's speech

>yfw St Paul's address to the synagogue

>yfw St Peter BTFOs the sanhedrin

>yfw Jews and commies going full blue-screen mode irl

It's going to be great.

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 23:21:40 eda093 No.596679

>>596666

>those quads

Christanon 01/30/18 (Tue) 23:34:38 0cd317 No.596689

>>596664

aayyylmao

Christanon 01/31/18 (Wed) 02:13:11 c9233a No.596757

File: 2004c311699b94b⋯.jpg (640.8 KB, 594x800, 297:400, allsaints03.jpg)

So when are we going to see the Christian Cinematic Universe?

Phase 1

>Passion and Resurrection

>Acts

>Martyrdom of Apostles

>Revelation

Phase 2

>Prequels? (Genesis, Exodus, etc)

Phase 3

>Movies about Apostolic era? (Polycarp, Justin Martyr, etc.)

>Movies about Ante-Nicene saints?

Christanon 01/31/18 (Wed) 02:22:21 9587f1 No.596758

ITT: stereotypical /christian/ thread

Christanon 01/31/18 (Wed) 03:17:01 6e3ee5 No.596797

>>596757

>Arius getting rekt in the face by Saint Nicholas

Christanon 01/31/18 (Wed) 04:12:53 7a9c02 No.596840

>>596666

>The movie is based on Acts

Actually, what is this movie based on? The first one was based on The Dolorous Passion Of Our Lord Jesus Christ by Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich. What's this one based on?

Christanon 01/31/18 (Wed) 04:23:39 95b9f3 No.596843

File: 7aae6c61191212e⋯.jpg (27.42 KB, 537x416, 537:416, ian-paisley-lol.jpg)

>>596584

mfw

>>596568

Cool story, OP, but I have precious little confidence Gibson will exceed expectations this time. The situations and scenes he will be dealing with will be too highly nuanced and subject to personal interpretation that a lot of people are gonna be triggered by his attempt.

imho anyway

>>596601

>that pic

not true (about Mel). The fact that Gibson's made and appeared in several films suggests (((they))) don't control everything. (((Some))) people will refuse to ever forgive him, but that's on them, innit?

Nevertheless, what it says about the other guy is entirely and woefully true

>>596664

>>596689

(polite tittering)

Christanon 01/31/18 (Wed) 04:34:51 90fd87 No.596846

>>596659

Someone who is more adept than me with this matter is more than welcome to correct me, but from my understanding, he didn't go to "hell" exactly. He went to Adam's Bosom. And apparently he lifted up people such as Moses, Adam and Eve to heaven. I remember reading once that it is kind of confusing in English translations, but it has something to do with: in Greek, it's stated as though Jesus simply descended to the place of the dead, and in turn we've just translated it to hell

Christanon 01/31/18 (Wed) 04:47:16 95b9f3 No.596853

File: 145b9188417c602⋯.jpg (10.06 KB, 290x174, 5:3, samefag-fightclub.jpg)

>>596587

>I haven't seen passion of the Christ yet.

>I heard some describe it as torture porn etc so I kinda lost interest.

>But I might be lead astray by salty nones.

>Is it that needlessly bloody or is it what we know?

You're my samefag, anon

I did TRY to watch it, but only got half way and thought "If I refuse to watch torture porn, why am I watching this?"

>>596593

>Pope John Paul II said …

Yeah, no offence, but one of the reasons I think that film IS torture porn-tier is because cathbros seem to live in the belief that it was the very human suffering of Christ that so terrified Him in the garden the night before ("take this cup…"), and so the crucifixion must therefore be made to look extremely bloody and feel horrifying. Well, while I am certain the days events were just that, it oversells'' the humanity of Christ as just a poor man (((they))) tortured and killed, and ignores – mostly, I think, because cathbros reject the theological notion – the role of God's wrath on Christ for our sins.

A servant cannot be greater than his master, yet we're saying Peter, who went to his cross willingly, unafraid, all-but mocking the Romans killing him by insisting they turn his cross upside down, was greater than Christ who cowered in the garden sweating blood and pleading with the Father? Surely not. The difference is that Peter did not bear the wrath of God for our sins, and THIS mystical event is what the crucifixion is REALLY about. Not some human form being whipped and humiliated. imho.

But, I am not inclined to think, for all Gibson's current desire to show the supernatural, that any of this is reflected in Gibson's first film.

Not that I know HOW you could portray God's wrath laid on Christ.

Christanon 01/31/18 (Wed) 06:56:58 548b0a No.596925

>>596853

How about you stop making up things that "THE EVIL PAPISTS REJECT" in your slander campaign, and accept that it is a movie? How disgusting

Christanon 01/31/18 (Wed) 23:26:59 294edc No.597317

>>596853

Torture porn is a bad meme. It's the same as applying feminist analysis to Paul's teachings. The movie's brutal and that's completely fine. Just because you're, no offense, a wuss doesn't make your your rant about Catholics ok.

The movie had two main goals. First one was to be a historically accurate depiction and the second one to make people realize how horrifying the crucifixion was. The two go hand in hand.

Your presupposition that the point was to show maximum torture is wrong and the strange attempt to "scientifically compare" Peter's to Jesus's end is inane for two reasons. Firstly because the movie wasn't showing maximum torture. And secondly, because Jesus's resurrection (which is *not* the main theme of the movie), but rather a deus ex machina punchline at the end, is something we can never fully understand and therefore can't be shown - nor compared to anything human.

Regarding the point you made that the garden scene is interpreted as a mere fear of physical pain - that's just stupid. I don't know where you got that idea and I don't want to know.

If we're actually going to talk Catholic theology, then it's a movie about love. Catholics emphasize that love, true love is in its essence, suffering. The movie focuses on suffering taken by our Lord out of Love before resurrection; on the road to redemption; not redemption itself. I think you completely missed the point of the film.