>>593573
>Neither quote supports the idea that Jesus has a human mind (which is ignorant) and a divine mind (which is all-knowing).
If Jesus has two natures then He can speak as regards both or either of them, since they are both really Him. I'll provide exact wording from St. Ambrose for you to admit it is orthodox, Book 5 of de Fide
> But if any one were to say that the Son worships God the Father, because it is written, 「You worship you know not what, we know what we worship,」 John 4:22 let him consider when it was said, and to whom, and to whose wishes it was in answer. 49. In the earlier verses of this chapter it was stated, not without reason, that Jesus, being weary with the journey, was sitting down, and that He asked a woman of Samaria to give Him drink; John 4:6-7 for He spoke as man; for as God He could neither be weary nor thirst. 50. So when this woman addressed Him as a Jew, and thought Him a prophet, He answers her, as a Jew who spiritually taught the mysteries of the Law: 「You worship you know not what, we know what we worship.」 「We,」 He says; for He joined Himself with men. But how is He joined with men, but according to the flesh? And to show that He answered as being incarnate, He added: 「for salvation is of the Jews.」 John 4:22 51. But immediately after this He put aside His human feelings, saying: 「But the hour comes, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father.」 John 4:23 He said not: 「We shall worship.」 This He would certainly have said, if He had a share in our obedience. 52. And when we read that Mary worshipped Him, Matthew 28:9 we ought to learn that it is not possible for Him under the same nature both to worship as a servant, and to be worshipped as Lord; but rather that as man He is said to worship among men, and that as Lord He is worshipped by His servants.
and further in the same book
>Lastly, to prove that He spoke as man, He says: 「The Father that sent Me, He bears witness of Me.」 John 8:18 But His testimony as God is true, as He Himself says: 「My record is true: for I know whence I come, and whither I go, but you know not whence I come, and whither I go. You judge after the flesh.」 John 8:14-15 They judge then not after the Godhead but after the manhood, who think that Christ had not the power of bearing witness.
Further From St. Augustines On the Trinity
>Or if it still seems contradictory and inconsistent to say, I will not judge, but I will judge; what shall we say of that place where He says, 「My doctrine is not mine?」 How 「mine,」 when 「not mine?」 For He did not say, This doctrine is not mine, but 「 My doctrine is not mine:」 that which He called His own, the same He called not His own. How can this be true, unless He has called it His own in one relation; not His own, in another? According to the form of God, His own; according to the form of a servant, not His own. For when He says, 「It is not mine, but His that sent me,」 He makes us recur to the Word itself. For the doctrine of the Father is the Word of the Father, which is the Only Son.
>not codify one thing into 'human' and another into 'divine' as if things predicated of Christ can only be said of a man or of God based on the appropriateness of the predication, rather than the man and God being one and the same thinking thing.
<He was truthfully expressing His true nature. If Jesus struggled to lift something heavy, He wasn't pretending, He was but a man.
If it applies to His actions, how can it not also apply to His words as according to circumstance? Again, how can it be "My commandment" and yet "not mine" except in speaking as regards His two natures?