[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ausneets / cafechan / chicas / ita / kemono / leftpol / thestorm ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Christchan is back up after maintenance! The flood errors should now be resolved. Thank you to everyone who submitted a bug report!

File: 30e99972d263330⋯.jpg (290.16 KB, 1062x1749, 354:583, lizzie.jpg)

7f2638 No.590294

Women shouldn't be priests but I think we should restore the ancient practice of having deaconesses. Wouldn't it be right?

39f7e2 No.590298

>>590294

There was an episode of Ancient Faith Radio on that topic, I can't look for it right now, maybe I will be able to later.

The TL;DL is that a deaconess is not a female deacon, their office served a different role. They would assist the priest with the baptism and application of sacraments to grown-up women back in the days when adult baptism was still common and underwear and swimsuits had not yet been invented. Over time the need for their office vanished, and so there are no deaconesses any longer.


39f7e2 No.590299

>>590298

I think this is the episode in question. It has a transcript when you scroll down if you don't feel like listening to it.

http://www.ancientfaith.com/podcasts/svsvoices/deaconesses


a063cc No.590302

>>590298

Patriarchate of Alexandria has deaconesses.

I've only heard the argument that deaconesses aren't like deacons from people who support it. I mean, I have never heard somebody who is against it claim that deaconesses are just like deacons except female.

>>590294

Pointless if it's not in a culture that creates a strong divide between the male and female sexes. So, we Western nations have no need for the office of deaconess (although it's good to keep in mind that it does exist and is apostolic). The situation in African countries is different though.


7f2638 No.590315

File: 8f1bb4cb190436d⋯.png (101.68 KB, 1597x231, 1597:231, Screenshot from 2018-01-17….png)

>>590299

Wow. Thanks, brother.

>>590298

>a deaconess is not a female deacon, their office served a different role

That makes sense but the deacons of today do not really "serve tables" i.e. serve as administrators of a community. All the financial ties belong to the bishops and priests for it is good or bad. And all the deacons do is just singing (must have strong voices :3) during the liturgy and helping a priest.


5aed74 No.590326

>>590307

>Half of the human race should get as little rights as possible instead of being loved as neighbors.

I'm sorry for whatever shitty upbringing you got but I hope you don't kiss the eucharest with that mouth.

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a3.htm


b85293 No.590338

>>590294

A very ambivalent topic. On the one hand the main care of deacons is pastoral, i.e. soul care and managing charities etc., but they cannot do things that require them to act in persona Christi, i.e. consecrate the Eucharist or utter absolution etc.. The problem comes in when you consider that there is no - and it is forbidden - ordination of women. That goes for monastic as well as other clerical orders. Therefore even nuns are neither clerical nor laity. They consecrate their life to Christ.

So, it's actually clear as of right now. No ordination -> no deaconess. And there's no way around it, because if you enable women to be ordinated to become deaconesses, there would be no reason not to ordinate women as priests and bishops - which is categorically and eternally impossible and ruled out, latest Pope Francis. I don't know for the Eastern Churches, but no Church Father I can imagine knew or spoke of female deacons. Neither Latin, nor Byzantine nor Egyptian.

What some people here mean when they say female deaconess is not the office of an ordinated deacon but "assistants" - similar to altar boys and girls in the Latin Church (I don't know if there's such thing in the Eastern churches) - that handle for example women that are baptized (y'know putting on the Christening robe etc.). Because if these are "actual deaconesses" as in ordinated to the office, then they simply aren't valid and the church that has them is heretical.

So I guess there's your answer. No, not possible.


da1959 No.590348

priest is an icon of christ. how can a woman do that? not good idea


51ce80 No.590355

>>590338

From what I've read even male deacons weren't like they are now until after Vatican II. I think before they were solely for people in the process of becoming a priest where as now they're often permanently there.


b85293 No.590357

>>590355

Deacons have always been like they are now, what changed is that V2 enabled "fulltime" deacons.


d2c03d No.590381

>>590372

Because the catechism says you're an unrepentant sinner.


c11f27 No.590382

>>590381

What are you talking about? I said female deacons are a bad idea.


d2c03d No.590384

>>590382

And also said that half of the human race should have as little rights as possible, and according to the Church and it's catechism:

>Respect for the human person entails respect for the rights that flow from his dignity as a creature. These rights are prior to society and must be recognized by it. They are the basis of the moral legitimacy of every authority: by flouting them, or refusing to recognize them in its positive legislation, a society undermines its own moral legitimacy. If it does not respect them, authority can rely only on force or violence to obtain obedience from its subjects. It is the Church's role to remind men of good will of these rights and to distinguish them from unwarranted or false claims. Respect for the human person proceeds by way of respect for the principle that "everyone should look upon his neighbor (without any exception) as 'another self,' above all bearing in mind his life and the means necessary for living it with dignity." No legislation could by itself do away with the fears, prejudices, and attitudes of pride and selfishness which obstruct the establishment of truly fraternal societies. Such behavior will cease only through the charity that finds in every man a "neighbor," a brother.


e1fe9f No.590388

>>590372

>haha lmao you truly btfo the misogynist xdddd


8ec181 No.590389

File: 0b6b6bc618d0890⋯.jpg (94.81 KB, 898x701, 898:701, unnamed.jpg)

>>590307

>Not respecting our sisters in Christ

Begone r9k


4b71e0 No.590393

>>590390

>Kurdish cannon fodder

If you consider a woman, a real knight, who is giving her life for the Church as nothing but cannon fodder while you sit on your ass playing YuGiOh, then you had better not even dare touch the man who gave his life for all of us this Sunday. You've clearly shown that you think women are inherently greedy by saying "you give them a finger and they take the whole hand." Whatever your full opinion is you can keep it to yourself, just make sure that it isn't offensive to the catechism or the Gospel because taking the Eucharist in mortal sin is a mortal sin and you don't deserve to reap whatever you're sowing right now.


147031 No.590409

>>590393

>gave his life for all of us this Sunday.

Do you people actually believe that Jesus dies again every Sunday?


4b71e0 No.590410

>>590409

Begone, my context-deaf heathen friend.


147031 No.590412

>>590410

I'm just asking. Calling me a heathen is pretty harsh.


c11f27 No.590413

>>590393

I apologize for my previous trolling, I'm just having a really bad day.

I should've thought about what I was posting.


4b71e0 No.590420

>>590412

I say so in jest, forgive me if other Baptists have hardened my heart a bit to you guys but when I see a question like that I register it as trolling.

No we don't believe he dies again every Sunday, but we do believe in the real body and blood in the Eucharist.

Truly, truly, I tell you, he who believes has eternal life. I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, yet they died. This is the bread that comes down from heaven so that anyone may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. And this bread, which I will give for the life of the world, is My flesh.”

At this, the Jews began to argue among themselves, “How can this man give us His flesh to eat?”

So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh and drink the blood of the Son of Man, you have no life in you. Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For My flesh is real food, and My blood is real drink.

Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood remains in Me, and I in him. Just as the living Father sent Me and I live because of the Father, so also the one who feeds on Me will live because of Me. This is the bread that came down from heaven. Unlike your fathers, who ate the manna and died, the one who eats this bread will live forever.”

Jesus said these things while He was teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum. On hearing this, many of His disciples said, “This is a difficult teaching. Who can accept it?

Aware that His disciples were grumbling about this teaching, Jesus asked them, “Does this offend you? Then what will happen if you see the Son of Man ascend to where He was before?

The Spirit gives life; the flesh profits nothing. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life. However, there are some of you who do not believe.” (For Jesus had known from the beginning which of them did not believe and who would betray Him.) John 6:53-63


4b71e0 No.590421

File: 298599a9a632934⋯.jpg (21.62 KB, 600x553, 600:553, i-know-that-feel-wojak.jpg)

>>590413

Is perfectly alright. Nobody ever apologizes when they are called out on this board, and I really needed to see someone who could today. Go forth, and sin no more.


147031 No.590428

File: 8ccca32a0452bf4⋯.png (319.73 KB, 291x420, 97:140, 8ccca32a0452bf422a93d35a4b….png)

>>590420

Reading the post that I first replied to, I realize that I misunderstood you.

>gave His life for all of us this Sunday

I thought you were trying to say that Jesus died this Sunday past, but now your meaning's been rendered quite clear. Sorry!


6bcb5c No.590744

Why is it that I can only imagine deaconesses being short haired heterodox hippies?


a063cc No.590747

File: 2a3f3a5df6121e7⋯.jpg (428.13 KB, 627x800, 627:800, 08.09.12.3424.JPG)

>>590413

Don't forget to pray our mother to pray for you, we all need it.


231ef1 No.590754

>>590421

>taking the Eucharist in mortal sin is a mortal sin

How can I absolve myself of this mortal sin? Confession? Prayer?


dd4675 No.590763

>>590420

John 6:63. Whole passage is about his words being his flesh that he spoke of. Lord's supper is many chapters later. If you don't think spiritual things are real that's a great concern




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ausneets / cafechan / chicas / ita / kemono / leftpol / thestorm ]