/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

>>580683

We have Body and Soul.

Or to divide even further: Spirit, Soul and Body

But our likeness to God is more by attributes that humans have (immortality, free will, dominance, etc.) rather than division or appearance of ours.

>>580684

>We have Body and Soul.

>

>Or to divide even further: Spirit, Soul and Body

those aren't persons, no comparison

>>580683

So many category issues.

>>580683

That's like asking "If we're the image of God, then why aren't we omnipotent?"

Some 'attributes' are exclusive to the divine essence such as multi-personality.

>>580684

To appeal to the trichotomous nature of man as being analogous to the Trinity, is to fall to the heresy known as partialism.

>Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”

<OUR

God's image, meaning a rational being with a degree of sovereignty.

>>580683

adam was the only person made in image of God

all others are made in the image of adam

>>580683

>body, soul, and spirit

>>580699

>To appeal to the trichotomous nature of man as being analogous to the Trinity, is to fall to the heresy known as partialism.

How so? My body isn’t a part of me, it contains the fullness of my nature. My soul isn’t a part of me either, as it contains the fullness of my nature. When I die, they won’t say “this is his body-part, his soul-part and spirit-part has left him!” They’ll say that the body is fully me, and in Heaven my soul will be counted as fully me. It’s still not a perfect analogy, as my body and my soul aren’t separate persons, but it is about as close as we can get to a trinity that isn’t God

We are. The mind corresponds to the Father, the body to the Son and the soul to the Spirit.

>>580683

>why aren't we 3 persons in one being?

I am a father, a brother, and a son. What's your excuse?

>>580683

>why aren't we 3 persons in one being?

>Man, Good and Evil

>Soul, Mind, Body

>>580853

all my family is dead :^)

>>580853

That’s Modalism Patrick!

>>580683

> Every man has three dimensions.

> Take a photo of a man

< Hurr durr, why has the photo only two dimensions, isn't it made in the image of the man?

>>580722

>meaning a rational being with a degree of sovereignty.

beings can be more than one person?

>>580699

attributes that are taken to infinity are exclusive to God, but personhood is a finite thing, he doesn't have infinite persons

>>580747

those aren't persons, those are aspects of a person. no comparison

>>580915

>moral spectrum

>soul body mind

none of those are persons, multiple or single, they are qualities of a person/being

>>581050

>man has an X,Y,Z axis, kind of like…God having multiple persons ;)

come on…you're not even trying

>>580683

He not wrong

>>580852

>>580684

>>580747

>>580915

Don't try to make retarded comparisons saying "see! There are three something! huehuehue!"

Being made in the image of God does not involve every single aspect of God, you idiots. We are not three persons and we will not be, not matter how many cringe-worthy attempts to find threes you make.

>>581698

And you are saying this by insulting fellow children of God, calling them idiots and retards.

I'm reporting you, for the note.

>>581700

You are a thin skinned idiot straight from reddit who cant stand people calling you out on your retarded "theology" in a chan and has to announce, with a red face, how much you are going to report anyone who is not a pansified half-man like you. You should get way from the internet before you are triggered to death, or at least go to a place like r/christianity, where the rest of the LGBTQBBQ community, which you seem to br a part of, will tell you how wonderful you are without the meanie words.

>>581785

I think the point is that we are on this site looking to discuss the things of God, which necessitates patience, calm, respectfulness and treating one another in good faith. I.e., to act like reasonable adults instead of edgy internet teenagers.

>>581787

And I think this is a chan, not reddit. Though there is not much difference with the new cabal

>>581788

It doesn't matter if it's a chan or not. If one wishes to treat the things of God properly it must be done in a peaceful manner – there can be no exceptions. If you went into a church poorly dressed, swearing at people and acting like an idiot you would likely be asked to leave – and for good reason. It's the same with this board. Either act like an adult, or leave. It's your choice. The board rules can be found here: >>520608.

>>581785

>>581788

<22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,

<23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. (Galatians)

<26 If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain. (James)

Anywho, I am reporting you yet again. Though I suspect that you are a falseflag, most likely.

>>581792

I just wanted to tell you you are a reddit-tier politically correct thin-skinned snake. Report me if you want and go then to lick some mod boot bragging about how much you report people.

I have given you solid advice: leave the internet since you are not suited for it. I have another piece of advice, though:

Matthew 23:33

>>581791

I do not care about the Francis vague rules installed by the new cabal. I care about yet another instance of how this board has grown i to another reddit. How about you and the cabal leave to reddit if you want reddit so much, instead of destroying this place with your tone policing?

>>581794

And here's an advice for you:

>Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour

And Another:

>2. Interactions must be for the sake of Charity. Post made in the spirit of disruption or spite could earn you a short to permanent ban.

Not to mention that your juvenile posts make me doubt that you are old enough to visit Chan sites anyways

Anyways, Have a good day in detention.

>>581797

Your thin skin, tone policing and constant mod licking, announcing how much you report people make me sure you are from reddit.

If you are going to accuse me of lying you could as well accuse me of raping babies, you slanderous snake, brood of vipers.

>>581800

>you slanderous snake, brood of vipers.

So basically you think you're right because you took up some comments on the bible but without the context it had nor the Intelligence the guy saying it had?

>>581800

Bruh, I hope you go confess to your priest because you broke like 6 articles of the catholic catechism ;)

>>581801

I think that, if you or anyone are going to complain about meanie words in your tone policing, you could as well complain about half the Bible

>>581802

I hope you confess from apathy ;)

>>581803

>;)

So much for hating reddit, eh?

>>581801

And please, spare me your magical contexts, which remind me of the "contexts" that protestants or muslims take out of their sleeves when it is convenient for them

>>581804

So much for "context"

>>581806

>Not knowing that ironic shitposting is still shitposting

I stand correct.

>>581807

You really should learn the meaning of the words you use, because it seems you took up some comments on 4chan without the context it had.

>>581811

No, it is tone policing from reddit idiots who are triggered by meanie words and like to brag about how much they report others.

I will remind you that lack of righteous anger is a sin. you have lost moral indignation. I am willing to flip tables. You are not, and try to use scripture as an excuse for your apathy.

>>581814

8chan, reddit, anything text based:

Terrible platforms for righteous indignation

There are no tables to flip here, friend. You're just spouting off calling people snakes, retards and half-men. It's not productive. Can't say that I've lost my moral indignation, I'm an andersonite and have too much of it.

>>581816

If they can tone police and ban anyone who uses meanie words I will call them out on it any day, through any medium. There are many tables to flip here and many reasons to flip them. I am not scared of words, just like Jesus, and the apostles, and the saints have not been afraid words like "snake", "viper", "fool" and many more. Because I want to show those retards that there are still people hwo doesnt bend the knee to their twisted manipulation and slander, and who are not afraid of their threats and scripture quotes, which are on par to muslims who quote scriptures to defend islam

>>581814

> lack of righteous anger is a sin

Internet theological discussions of this nature don’t require righteous anger. You’re being unreasonably angry for no good reason. Also, you accused a random anon of being a homosexual without any basis. That’s bearing false witness, and unacceptable regardless of how serious things are.

Id, ego, and super ego.

>>580683

https://youtu.be/ZbBDHePdHeg

>>580683

Much in the way a drawing made in an draughtsman's image lacks a dimension and thus certain qualities of its creator, so do we.

Is that a good analogy?