[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / aus / htg / hypno / miku / pinoy / strek / sw / zooscat ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Christchan is back up after maintenance! The flood errors should now be resolved. Thank you to everyone who submitted a bug report!

File: 704a7eaa1f268aa⋯.jpg (20.43 KB, 300x199, 300:199, free-bible-studies-online-….jpg)

f4e7d6 No.576917

> En arche en ho logos kai ho logos en pros ton theon, kai ho logos en theos.

What did John mean by this? Uniting Greek philosophy (Plato) with Christianity or describing a new Logos of (Christian) Trinitarian ontology/metaphysics? Thoughts on the Gospel of John?

a15c97 No.576932

In the special context of late antique, Greek-speaking Judaism, and particularly in the work of Philo, the word had come to mean a very particular kind of divine reality, a secondary or derivative divine principle proceeding from the Most High God and mediating between God and the created order. There was a shared prejudice among many of the philosophical systems of late antiquity to the effect that the highest God, God proper, in his utter transcendence could not interact directly with or appear immediately within the created order; hence it was only through a "secondary god" or "expressed divine principle" that God made the world and revealed himself in it. It was assumed by many Jewish and then Christian thinkers that the theophanies of the Jewish scriptures were visitations of the Logos, God's self-expression in his divine intermediary or Son, as Philo called him. To an educated reader of the late first or early second century, the Logos of John's prologue would clearly have been just this divine principle: at once the Most High God's manifestation of himself in a secondary divine moment, and also the pervasive and underlying rational power creating, sustaining, and governing the cosmos.


edb298 No.576934

>>576917

>What did John mean by this?

He meant that in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / aus / htg / hypno / miku / pinoy / strek / sw / zooscat ]