/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

>military service

If white then run like hell away from service to ZOG ZOG = military, which is to say zionist occupied government, which is to say babylonian occupied government or college. Learn a trade and learn to literally make, create, and grow everything you will ever need or use with your own two hands.

If non-white do the same thing but if black or spic then use college if in EU/america to your advantage with tuition assistance to literally get you through college debt free. This gives you better job opprotunities to get starting cash for self-sufficiency and to learn to be so in your free time. If chink or arabian/(((white))) then go the ZOG military route and realise (((they))) are eventually going to be having you killing christians doesn't matter where you are at some point so get out quick with what you need to be self-sufficient. Then do the above of being self-sufficient from anybody so you may better serve Christ with time. Preach the word in season and out of course.

>>572990

Start reading scriptures daily, and meditate on what you find therein. This will help will discernment of what you should do. If you want to know what God wants you to do, meet him in his word. Start with Mark and Matthew, then Galatians, then Ephesians, and go from there. I'll be praying for you. Oh, and go talk to your pastor!

Watch this before you enlist.

>>573002

Shame on you. Wouldn't you want to become the biggest idiot ever by joining the ZOG military? completely serious btw, its a great test of discipline

>>573008

I can't actually see any of these videos since I block all scripts/fonts/images/etc by default. Care to WEBM it for me or tell me what is actually happening in them?

>>573012

>unblock it

I could, I also could be (((suicided))). I don't for speed though and not to give jewtube shekels. The speakers arguement is a non-arguement because of romans 13 applying to joining ZOG yet serving God in the spirit. Just don't go after them yourself of your own authority what authority btw. Also

>thinking nukes are real

>>573015

You think if you enable scripts the government is gonna kill you? Uh okay.

Re: Romans 13, it is about us obeying government, not becoming government. Romans 13 means we should do what government tells us to unless it conflicts with what God tells us to do. "Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers". Civil government is a higher power than ourselves as individuals, but God is a higher power still. So we should not do anything that conflicts with God's word. Joining the army does conflict with God's word. "Thou shalt not kill". Yes, kill means murder there. But killing people in an unprovoked war is murder. What was the last war the United States fought in self-defense? Maybe the American revolution, if you're generous? Some would point to Pearl Harbor although that becomes questionable if you research it more. But definitely nothing in the past several decades.

God will judge us for our actions. He will not see your uniform and think "Oh, that makes it okay then". Just think about the president. Whether you're for Trump or against him, he said in the run-up to the election he supported stealing other countries' oil after invading them. "To the victor go the spoils" he said. That's theft. You want to sign up to fight under him? God will judge you for what you do in war.

>>573022

You don't understand authority and how it works. There is a reason John 4:24 and matthew 4:8-10 are said. You worship God in the spirit and have no confidence in the flesh Philipians 3:3. Realise that glory/consequences go to the authority of you. If you, as a member of the body of Christ, do something then you are representing your authority, God and His Son Christ. But you can only do that if you are doing it in the philipians 3:3 for romans 8:8 holds true. Now if you serve God in the philipians 3:3, then what of the flesh of which there is none righteous romans 3:10save for Christ alone? Read Mark 8:33 and take it literally, why is Jesus literally calling Peter, Satan? Because of what you do glorifies those in authority over you, not that displeasing God is glorious but Satan got the consequences of such. There's way way more if you want to start a new thread.

>>573029

>you're that same guy who just posts bible verses without quoting, summarizing or paraphrasing them and just expecting everybody who reads your posts to already have them memorized or do the work of looking them up

Argh, do you not get how annoying that is?

>>573029

I find your way of writing really difficult to understand. You are saying if you are in the spirit then God gets the glory or consequences of your actions. So by that way of thinking if you murder people for the army it's actually God murdering them through you so it's okay? If that's what you mean it's a dangerous way of thinking, and if it's not what you mean you need to communicate clearer.

Something I want to do in the military is share the Bible with everyone. I looked into becoming a chaplain.

>>573032

It's even more annoying when I'm quoting direct Scripture and a catholic wiggles out of the argument by acting like or implying I'm that guy and therefore any scripture can be ignore. Even though I put the full quotation there.

>>573039

no, the real problem is that even when someone does look up the appropriate scripture, there is almost no context to whatever it is you're talking about

leading to

poster a: (scripture dump)

poster b: what does this have to do with this

poster a: uh hah, yeh i was just testing to see if you knew scripture, so these are kinda vaguely related out of context, but in my personal context you can see the point

in a way, you are a succinct example of what's wrong with "Baptist Bible Studies" and Sola Scriptura, your methods are only fit for argumentation among Christians using circular logic, leading to even more schism and conflict.

But who is convinced by any argument when they reject scripture? Nobody! Baptists have bred a generation only fit to argue amidst themselves! Pharisees, through and through.

>>573044

No that's just wiggling out of the argument. Pharisees nullified scripture just like the catholics do.

See for instance, Mark 7:7-9

>Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

>For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.

>And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

This fits Roman Catholics, wishing to say that various scriptures don't really mean anything at all (citing authority of the rabbis/fathers), and therefore they can't violate the scriptures, just as the Pharisees did argue back in Mark 7. Also if you rejected scripture you could simply say so, but that's not what you do, you nullify it instead and claim it cannot be understood— or essentially that it means nothing. And yet despite your assertion, God is not the author of confusion; and faith comes by hearing, hearing by the word of God.

>>573045

The Jews were using their Jewish traditions to deny the new covenant and their own messiah, how does this apply to Roman Catholics using the traditions of the Church Fathers after the appearance of the gospel?

You may as well say the new covenant has no superiority over the old. Well, many protestants do, actually.

And this is the problem with Protestants and Catholicism. In your cause-less and unjustified venom and rancor, you call Christ a liar.

No, Christ did not establish His Church on St. Peter, St. Peter left no Church! No, hell prevailed over this church despite what Christ said, because this Roman Church was established…somehow over the secret older one…that is somehow Independent Fundamental Baptist or something???

That is nullification of scripture bub. And history, too.

>God is not the author of confusion

Yea, you are.

>>573032

>>573039

muh 1 corinthians 15:44

>>573078

Ah! I did not know Christ preached to different Apostles; and, charged each to start their own, separate, independent, fundamentalist, Baptist Church!

He didn't. You know He didn't.

>>573079

Some of us still recognize the apostles as the authority and the word they gave. Others ""moved on"" exactly like Paul warned in Acts 20.

>For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them. Therefore watch, and remember, that by the space of three years I ceased not to warn every one night and day with tears. And now, brethren, I commend you to God, and to the word of his grace, which is able to build you up, and to give you an inheritance among all them which are sanctified.

The higher authority is the word of God and His church, namely the literal Apostles, not any grievous usurpers, teaching what they ought not for filthy lucres sake.

Ephesians 2:19-20

<Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;

<And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;

Galatians 1:9

>As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

Orders accepted and obeyed.

>>572990

?, become a deacon and help the church normalize spouses for clergy throughout the globe , as is normal an example heterosexual that can be familial public every life , 1 spouse to a priest and 1 child of each gender , along with helping your area to stay safe ,.

>>573076

Why don't you explain in plain English what these verses mean to you instead of just doing drive-by verse posting?

>>573734

It's purposeful obscurantism.