>A happy and eternal being has no trouble himself and brings no trouble upon any other being; hence he is exempt from movements of anger and partiality, for every such movement implies weakness
Oh boy you are wrong.
>A happy and eternal being has no trouble himself
If you said only this, you would be correct.
>and brings no trouble upon any other being;
And here we see how little you know about theology. A hapy and eternal being must be loving being. And loving being wishes to bring happines to all. And thus we see that he can and will bring trouble upon other beings since he is loving.
> hence he is exempt from movements of anger
God does not "feel" anger. Anger is corporal feeling. But he names his act of reason of will anger due to similiarity. And he can act in angry way becuase he is love.
> and partiality
Partiality implies that one see some better than other. Happy and eternal being by necessity see things obiectivly and his "partiality" is thus just
>for every such movement implies weakness
This thread implies weakness of your mind
Read Saint Thomas and come back in month.