[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / fur / g / hydrus / kemono / shota / sl / tijuana / wai ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Christchan is back up after maintenance! The flood errors should now be resolved. Thank you to everyone who submitted a bug report!

File: 8c10b07ef421703⋯.jpg (121.52 KB, 401x669, 401:669, celebrated-v-reviled-v1.jpg)

File: 09796230e6a094e⋯.jpg (135.44 KB, 404x715, 404:715, celebrated-v-reviled-v2.jpg)

633b8a No.537165

/christian/ … GET IN HERE!!!

Now I know SOMEONE will "thread not /christian/" but, come on, if holding a mirror to this fallen world's shithole's place's face isn't /christian/'s job, then I cannot imagine who else's it is.

So, I've only just caught-up with the hand-wringing and breast-beating sackcloth-n-ashes festival going on in the media about Hollywood's abetting yet another sexual predator – and when exactly is the Coreys' rapist(s) getting his/theirs? – when it occurred to me that,

< "Hang on, weren't we, just these past few days gone, celebrating the life of a man that spearheaded turning the 20th and now 21st centuries into a celebration of bacchanalian lust?"

Over 9,000 hours in ms paint later and, tah-dah. But, I cannot figure out the white text, or even whether any is needed. Thoughts?

I will point out that the immediate response to my "why" question in the first one is likely to be "but Hef' didn't rape", which is very true, but also entirely not my point.

My point is that he publicly promoted celebrating lust, made a paradise of (his own) sexual liberation, bedded as many arguably beautiful young women for no reason other than he wanted to celebrate this kind of activity as normal and worthy of celebration. And wanted the world to follow his lead. What about these rapists is not just an extension of that line of thinking? "I, too, have power (and quaaludes). I should get me also some o' dat." They just tried their own version of celebration but the world is all like, "but that's not what we meant". But … really? Isn't it?

Hefner used his power to bed young women, the power to make them into stars, to give them a wealthy lifestyle, to have them meet powerful men, maybe marry them. He was a glorified pimp, in some respects, who slept with the merchandise. How are any of these other men different, other than they were somehow LESS successful with the bedding and so turned to violence to get what they wanted?

I can put the basic idea in meme, but I guess I am finding it hard to put that in words. I am concerned that it will be taken the wrong way, that … I dunno, the world is better at manipulating ideas than poor ole me. Was kinda hoping I could crowdsource fixing that. Not for my own benefit, mind. I encourage betterifying what I've tried to do – steal away.

But, look, if they're shit, say so. I'd rather not add to the steaming pile.

83db39 No.537172

you are trying way too hard


163833 No.537173

>>537165

We don't hold a mirror to the world here. That would be rather pointless, don't you think? Go out and preach to those unaware or who may be lost or ignorant.

Also, the message of the images is a little off don't ya think? If you reap what you sow, then apparently the objectification of women will make you wealthy, give you a long life, and further your lifelong career.


633b8a No.537205

File: 08c271cdcd33b4f⋯.jpg (49.69 KB, 396x396, 1:1, computer-says-no.jpg)

>>537173

>Go out and preach to those unaware or who may be lost or ignorant.

But that IS to whom this is aimed: people unaware of the mire they're living in.

>If you reap what you sow, then apparently the objectification of women will make you wealthy, give you a long life, and further your lifelong career.

Really? But that clearly isn't the case for the others.

>>537172

Okay. Fine. Computer says "no", then.


15ee01 No.537207

>>537165

is this pasta?


5fbe0d No.537221

>>537207

obviously not if the OP is titled "OC"


ac01e3 No.537225

>>537165

Who made the source image and which one is yours?


15ee01 No.537232

>>537221

True, otherwise the OC police would have taken this down by now.


5fbe0d No.537246

>>537225

both are mine

all source images are mine

I made everything about the OP images except, I suppose the original photographs


5fbe0d No.537248

File: 218896b72e70caa⋯.jpg (111.65 KB, 400x578, 200:289, celebrated-v-reviled-v3.jpg)

>>537246

So, for example …


163833 No.537251

>>537205

>But that clearly isn't the case for the others.

So, Bill Cosby, Bill O'Reilly, and Harvey Weinstein aren't wealthy with lifelong careers?


688204 No.537252

>>537165

Sorry but who are the gentlemen on the top of the pic ?


163833 No.537253

>>537248

I think the point you might be missing here is that Hefner didn't clandestinely drug women and take advantage of them on the sly. He built an empire out of women, hiring them for their looks, paying them to pose nude, and there was nothing secret about it.

The other men did it in secret, denied it, and threatened anyone who tried to expose them. Despite that, they became wealthy and built empires regardless of their secret perversions and filth. Then they got exposed.

You can't "expose" Hefner. Everyone already knows about him.


a1901f No.537257

>>537252

Bill Cosby, Bill O'Reilly and Harvey Weinstein

>>537251

So, you're having fun derailing the argument or are you genuinely misunderstanding everything I wrote?

The reaping and sowing isn't that of those men, it's what the world sowed with Hefner's lust paradise and is now reaping in rapists.

Is this your first visit to /christian/?

>>537253

>I think the point you might be missing here is that Hefner didn't clandestinely drug women

Read the OP again. I explicitly say that isn't my point:

< I will point out that the immediate response to my "why" question in the first one is likely to be "but Hef' didn't rape", which is very true, but also entirely not my point.

I don't know why you think I am trying to "expose" Hefner.


163833 No.537265

>>537257

>the world sowed with Hefner's lust paradise and is now reaping in rapists

So there were no rapists before Hefner? I think you still need to re-examine what you're trying to accomplish here.


a1901f No.537268

File: e28fe00a09e1a8d⋯.jpg (21.75 KB, 200x150, 4:3, guide-to-trolling.jpg)

>>537265

>So there were no rapists before Hefner?

What?! Who's saying that?!

Does something bad have to be created ex nihilo before it can be recognised as a bad thing?!

Or is it not valid to say, "more of something bad is worse than what we had"?

>I think you still need to re-examine what you're trying to accomplish here.

Oh, it's abundantly clear I'm being too subtle for the internet


c93453 No.537270

it's pretty easy to tell who you are based on your formatting style. post relevant content or leave


a1901f No.537271

>>537270

>it's pretty easy to tell who you are based on your formatting style

'kay

>post relevant content or leave

What does this mean in english?


163833 No.537283

>>537268

You're the one claiming that we wouldn't have Cosby, O'Reilly, and Weintstean if we didn't love Hefner.

>more of something bad is worse than what we had

Except it's not "more of something" it's just that people are more likely to come forward today than they were, say, 100 years ago. If a woman came forward 100 years ago and said, "This man raped me!", she would be met with "Oh, you women and your hysterics. Let's send you to the sanatorium."

>I'm being too subtle for the internet

Yeah, you're just soooo much smarter than everyone. Face it, kid, your message is meaningless and muddled. You even have to resort to "he must be a troll" memes to stay afloat in a simple discussion.


a1901f No.537313

>>537283

>"we"

>identified for non-Christian

I understand now.


163833 No.537356

>>537313

"We" as in the collective us, humanity, the world. You are claiming that Cosby, O'Reilly, and Weinstein would not exist without Hefner. You are wrong. Either admit it or keep up the laughable "arguments" you're presenting.


c7ffb5 No.542649

File: b1433255ff4b1b6⋯.png (410.2 KB, 702x1301, 702:1301, babylonbee-morally-bankrup….png)

Babylon Bee done dunnit


c19a1a No.542652


c19a1a No.542654

>>542652

Looks like i can't have a real and a decent life and put the young ones in my family through school. Looks like I have to act like a f*cking degenerate like the degenerate system wants to make everybody because they themselves are the authors of degeneracy.


c19a1a No.542655

>>542654

The "system".


c7ffb5 No.542854

>>542652

and wat does this have to do with the op?




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / fur / g / hydrus / kemono / shota / sl / tijuana / wai ]