/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover

It's a TOR bot, it attacked many other boards before us.

I disabled TOR posting for now and I'm trying to clean everything up.

Keep reporting the spam.

Thanks.

>>83877

Honestly it should be easy to just write an auto-mod bot to automatically delete posts which match a certain regex.

The /a/ mods have something like that, and they'd probably be happy to share the code.

What even is a "hapa" anyway?

>>83911

Asian / white mongrel

>>83877

You should wordfilter it to DIAPERS ARE SUPERIOR TO HAPAS

>>83894

>The /a/ mods have something like that

I'll check it, thanks. The settings have no regexp facility whatsoever, so any good solution will be 3rd party.

>>83921

That won't work because there's a line-break after "SUPERIOR", so only part of it can be filtered. If there's a filter just for "TO WHITES" it'll misfire a lot.

>>83940

>>83921

Colored diapers are superior to whites!

>>83988

Honestly I get really annoyed when artists color dirty diapers as completely brown. The only way that could happen is if they were given an enemy full of food coloring.

Wet diapers aren't bright yellow either - any coloring should be subtle.

That said, cute character-print diapers are far superior to boring white ones.

>>83940

>I'll check it, thanks. The settings have no regexp facility whatsoever, so any good solution will be 3rd party.

Just please make sure it's refined enough to only catch the spammers and not legit posts. Also, aren't filters just a losing game?

It will just become "H A P A S A R E S U P E R I O R T O W H I T E S" or some variation thereof

>>83940

>That won't work because there's a line-break after "SUPERIOR", so only part of it can be filtered. If there's a filter just for "TO WHITES" it'll misfire a lot.

Just change it to "We must secure the existence of our fetish and a future for all-white diapers."

>>84000 (checked)

>Just please make sure it's refined enough to only catch the spammers and not legit posts.

Easier said… Remember that time we had some russian pedo spammer? Some months ago, someone managed to trigger one of the filters for it.

So it's better to set filters to fixed cases and manually delete some others.

>Also, aren't filters just a losing game?

Yep, filter is a cat and mouse game.

>>84000

> Also, aren't filters just a losing game?

At the moment the spam can be fully automated because the captcha has certain design flaws which make it fairly easy to segment and solve. There's no way to ban the spammer since they're using TOR. The spammer has to do minimal work, but the BO has to manually delete every spam post.

Adding auto-deletion filters forces the spammer to keep updating his code manually. It levels the playing field so that each side has to put in the same effort, and generally does a better job of keeping the board clean.

>>84001

If you want help writing the code, just ask. I've never modded a board, but I've written plenty of web scrapers and bot-like things.