/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover★

>>77237 (OP)

All lines are arbitrary. Everyone ends up equally dead in the ends.

I would advise him to take whatever action he thinks will lead to the greatest net happiness, but not fret too much about making the wrong decision.

If the worse comes to the worst, there's always suicide.

>crossposting from r/abdl without a link

>similar story posted here a few months ago with a few details changed

All aboard the ruse cruise!

I don't do public stuff at all, but if I did, I would say anything illegal would be the hard limit. Everything else would fall in a very vague and broad range of "do it" and "nope," based on my own subjective opinions and willingness to take certain risks.

So, based on my own subjective opinions and willingness to take certain risks, what your friend did would be a strong "nope" for me. Then again, I'm not nearly that autistic, so I have some awareness of the fact I don't need to make minimum wage workers' lives harder than it already is, if I can help it.

>>77237 (OP)

fuck that guy. public stuff like voyeurism is okay, as is just wearing a diaper in public, maybe even using it.

but forcing someone to take part in your fetish is disgusting, and he should be ashamed of himself. that is where i draw the line.

Didn't we just cover this topic a few months ago? I remember this "story" being told before.

>>77258

I think there's a small subset of ABDL people who do this sort of thing. I've also heard stories of people doing similar stuff at bars and retail stores. Basically places that give them an opportunity to force some poor underpaid employee (typically a woman, like in the OP) to take part in their fantasy.

Those type of people are well aware of their actions. They may or may not have autism, but they'll use it as an excuse to act like a disgusting degenerate. If I were that woman I would cure his autism with a well-deserved ass beating. Or at least fantasize about it.

If it involves other people without their consent, it is too far.

>>77237 (OP)

>How far is too far

When you disgrace our fetish (hard to do, I know, but basically imagine if what you're doing i something a furry could get away with, and you'll know whether you should do it or not) or you involve (that is to say directly bother) nonconsenting persons.

>>77324

I also find it funny how the leddit mods deleted the pasta thread in fewer than 24 hours

>this is reddit we only have constructive conversations and agreement here.

>Shitposting is violence, trolling is violence, banter is violence, anything except validating circlejerks is toxic violence.

>I expect to log on every day and be told that everything I believe is correct and profound. I expect people who disagree with me to be platformed and then die.

>Opinions I don't like shouldn't be allowed to exist.

>I don't believe in free will or freedom of speech.

>Be correct or die

>[NPC programming glitch]

Imagine being like that.

For this whole thread:

You know what they say, "Just because you can, doesn't mean you should".

Also: "Don't scare the Straights".

>>77366

roflmao someone's bitter about being banned

>>77396

You can’t get banned from reddit dumbass. You just make a new account. Only numale attention whores care about accumlating smegma points on reddit