(I'm unable to post on endchan.xyz/horror/ so I post here instead.)
For those of you that stick to symbolism and take literally what is meant figuratively, this post may induce cringe and confusion more than to serve as the eye-opener it is meant. I am however not able to use the English language in a way that allows for perfect communication, nor any other language whether natural or artificial. This leaves me with no option but the words that I have analyzed as the most likely to be efficiently understood by you.
http://endchan.xyz/horror/res/449.html#471
>It's like the artist seen some things or had some things described to him but wasn't able to recreate them exactly.
Your nose is on the money. Now sniff.
What's happening is a restructuring of the fabric of spacetime, an event that happens every single cycle of creation and refreshes the universe and clears the cache. There is a current glitch in this system due to the extensive documentation that humanity has done on its own history, which for so long has remained mostly inaccessible at the instant, allowing the information being accessed to be refreshed automatically at each instant of access as there has been a delay. Currently, these delays are getting shorter and more frequent, and collective thoughts are becoming challenged in a way that does not allow for earlier simplified caching to be resorted to as reliable. This brings forth a challenge, namely which data is to be downloaded into the universe and which is to be kept in the cloud, which version of a file is to be uploaded and which is to be downloaded. This is why so many glitches are being seen currently and why so many famous people are dying, as people's memories of them are in conflict with one another, yet less people interact with celebrities now than ever before and the distance between reality and fiction is being shortened by social media presence and other forms of non-corporeal interaction and exchange of information, causing cosmic cancer. People who are known by all but seen by few are most likely to die as a result of the shuffling of the cache, see David Bowie as a perfect example. One way to keep the cache from being cleared, to keep people from being taken with the waves, is for the masses and individuals to ignore them completely while continuing to let them live their life as they live and not interfere except in ways that are influential to both lives: in short, any person can suddenly retroactively die. They will have died and nobody will have heard about it, but when you personally hear of their death and let it be known through any means that you know that they are dead, everybody will have known that they are dead ever since they died. This is not only limited to asking others if they knew that the person in question had died, but also searching online for information of that person or in any way coming in contact with information about that person. It is a near-perfect system, one that reflects the reality so closely that most never think too much on the glitches, but there are times when the different cached versions of data cause the loss of life or in extreme cases vast alterations in the architecture of the universe.
Now, you may flinch at "architecture" as a Masonic term. It's not. It's the term I chose to use simply because it refers to an overall "structure" that is "designed". What I mean to say is that there are times when entire countries and their populations vanish, and nobody bats an eye, and other times when even larger-scale things occur such as the moving of Sri Lanka. It has always been in the position it is now, southeast of India, but simultaneously it has always been to the south directly and moved at some point in the past; for others it will move to the southeast only later or perhaps back directly south. What we see now is merely the reflection of reality that is most up to date in the pool of information accessible at this instant. Mandela may have died in prison, he may still be alive. We will never know what the objective truth is - not even the "great architects" know, and again, the somewhat Masonic reference is intentional but not to be taken at linguistic depth, so that its only depth should be on the concept: there are "shapers" of all things that are not at all close to omniscient, yet these are the very "designers" of the universe as it is known even to themselves.
cont.