/x/ - Paranormal★

>What's your favorite cryptid?

Ningen is interesting.

>what do you think is most likely to exist?

Whatever is a bit mundane, like some undiscovered primate

>which cryptid do you REALLY want to be real

Living dinosaurs

>most bizarre?

Unidentified Flying Humanoids

>favorite cryptid story?

Anything that has to do with unusually large creatures. Example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remy_Van_Lierde#Alleged_encounter_with_a_giant_snake

pls respond

>>17432

Giant sized critters are my favorite, but also the least plausible. Big things = big appetites, and no ecosystem can readily support that. If there is any undiscovered giant animal it's gonna be something sedentary with low caloric requirements like a 300 ton deep sea sponge. Still interesting but doesn't have the same wow factor.

>>17520

I don't know man, some of those parts of the ocean…

>>17524

Yeah, anon was talking big appetites?

No one would even notice if a whale or two goes missing

bump

>>17624

>giants

>real

Yeah but probably not the way you were hoping for. Remember historically people were shorter than the modern average, so individuals seen as "giant" in history would be rather unimpressive now. Take the biblical Goliath- while later writers paint him as a ten foot monster wearing more armor than a Bradley tank (literally, some very imaginative rabbis give weights of 60-120 tons for his armor) the dead sea scrolls and other early texts peg him at a much more reasonable 6' 9". Still quite intimidating to the 5 foot and under manlets of the time but now nothing to write home about.

It's quite possible that isolated tribes with good genetics could routinely make the 6 foot range, and everyone would see them as monsters. Or just like today, rare individuals would reach 7 or 8 feet. Impressive now, mind blowing then. But you have to remember, compared to most of history, we are the giants.

Do we count great old ones because they're my favourite

>>17640

like lovecraft great old ones?

>>17624

>Straya

I'll believe just about anything living there

>>17738

Wasn't there a nomadic tribe that was found in the 90's that had been in the outback for thousands of years without even the other aboriginals running into them?

>>17845

I don't know, but I'd like to hear more about it.

While this vid does go into Annunaki shit later on, the early shit on Bigfoot is really eye-opening.

I'll break it down:

>pre-human bones incredibly thick, built for tons of muscle like an ape

>even neanderthals are nothing like humans

>neanderthal fossils disappeared around the same time human fossils began appearing

>neanderthals never went extinct, they were just pushed from the plains (where lots of fossils can be made) into the forest (forest-dwelling creatures rarely ever make fossils) by our ancestors

>pre-humans weren't just thick-browed humans like the science jews tell you, they were more like upright apes

>sasquatch, the ama, yetis, they're all living neanderthals

>inb4 why haven't we found one?

It's incredibly fucking hard to find one because humans aren't made for woods-trekking. Pandas are very hard to find, and they're brightly-colored, slow, dumb and diurnal, so imagine how hard it would be to find a dark, quick, highly-intelligent and nocturnal creature.

Finally, some evidence stuff:

>there are certain tell-tale signs that show if a footprint is real or fake

>a foot has moving muscles and bones, a fake is just one solid object

>patterson film is real, you can see muscles rippling under the skin, and the sasquatch has tits (>inb4 gb2 deviantart)

I fucking love Bigfoot.

>>17971

The creature captured in the Patterson film had a lot of things going for it. The musculature, the skeletal structure, the posturing and gait. Not saying it can't be fake, but if it is a hoax it's a damn good one with a hell of a lot of thought put into the details.

>>17971

Kek, neanderthals racemixed untill they die.

Not trolling, if you aren't 100% black you have some neanderthal blood in you.

>>17990

>kek

Opinion discarded, post hidden. Go back to /b/, kid.

>>17994

Check genome please, i am talking about facts, not opinions or feelings.

>>17994

>>17994

>if you aren't 100% black you have some neanderthal in you

So really Neanderthals are not only alive but the dominant species outnumbering those dirty subneander home sapiens?

That's the interpretation I feel like going with.

>>18009

I have some studies but i don't want any trouble so think about me like another faggot in the internet telling lies. Its easier to track chickens to dinosaurs than humans to "ancient humans" and all that crap started because you have to choose, blacks are a different specie or all "sapiens" are the same and science already chose blacks neanderthal, florensis, denisovans, etc being differents species. Fun fact, even India has better records and views in human evolution than the west and all thanks to the need to ingratiate cultural marxism with real science.

>>18019

>>18019

Post more info if you feel comfortable, I've been thinking a lot that this may be the case. The idea that modern European descended humans are still homo sapiens with only trace lines of neanderthal dna is better for the "one race human race" narrative but from what I've seen there's at least as much evidence that it's the other way around, that "whites" are more accurately evolved neanderthals with some sapiens dna, with most "blacks" being pure or nearly pure sapiens and other racial lines being more even hybrids. Note that I do feel rather trepidatious breaching this subject since I know fucking stormfags are gonna jump on it as proof for their narrative that "niggurs r subhoomen" when really that's not what this is fucking about. It's not culture, it's science, but apparently no one can tell the difference anymore.

>>18019

what does India think? we know that Russians don't get along with the Out of Africa story but their politics are what they are, so…

I'm interested in knowing about the Indians' views.

>>18051

The problem is clasification, classic says that negroids are a different specie, simple as that but you can't say that so western science is ruined by double standard.

You have two solutions:

A.-A new system with nigs, cavemans, etc like the same specie with different races.

B.- The same system and accept blacks as a different specie and asians and whites being different races of the same specie. We aren't prepared for this.

The problem is that the first system will change everything, all bio books will be obsolete and you will have to rearrange everything according to "muh feelings", the second will be worse.

>>18052

Well, i am not an indian so i don't know but we have to remember that "marxist science" was implying that "evolution" "stopped" like 10.000 years ago (they were probably aiming at Nevali Cori or domestic wheat, i am not sure, but is almost the same place and time), apus showed facts against that "out of my ass theory" and not only that, but they proved how evolution acelerated a lot since that time and how "racemixing" is ruining every "bio achievement".

>>18052

>russian politics

I'm not familiar. Has science been co-opted to serve the whim of society there as well?

>>19026

What is that supposed to be?

>favourite cryptid

Mkolo mbembe

Probably butchered the spelling but its supposedly a dinosaur like creature that lives in the depths of africa. Sounds impossible but tribal niggers who cant identify a giraffe recognize a brontosaurus when shown pics.

>most likely to exist

Bigfoot or giants. Theres enough evidence that anyone who pays attention will have questions.

>which do i want to be real

Mkolo mbembe. Id give every penny i have to ride a sauropod.

>most bizarre

Probably some of the jap ones. Example would be the one whose head is a water bowl and you have to convince it to bend over and spread its arsecheeks at you to spill the water.

>favourite cryptid story

I dont have a distinct favourite but i love the stories of encounters where their seems to be intelligence to the creature.

>>19062

Looks like an unknown creature, something akin to the montauk monster.

Does anyone know if there is any cryptid that supposedly steals metal objects and leaves other metal objects in return? Or anything like that?

>>28817

Sounds like some kind of fairy/gnome, but I've never heard of this specific behaviour. Try asking them to stop.

>>28821

I would actually like it to continue, just for confirmation. It has only happened one time that I've noticed (if it even was that, which I remain unsure of)… what signs should I look for? And how would I ask them to stop, or promote similar behavior in the future?

From those two options, my intuition told me fairy (as well as the weird trickery stuff that I just read about), but the whole "night time behavior" thing may indicate gnome from what I've read.

Since some of you mentioned giants, I figure you'll like this article. It's about one of the three types of Yeti, the really big one (4-5 metres high). It also suggests that they might be highly intelligent, which I found interesting. I can't help but be reminded of the ice giants fought by Thor in Scandinavian folklore. Maybe once upon a time this type of creature was also found in Europe.

http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2017/01/the-biggest-yeti-of-all/

>>28826

I would think that they are two different animals. I'm pretty sure Jotun were intelligent enough to use steel, whereas the Nyalmo is supposed to only use wood/bone tools. Plus, the Nyalmo sound more sasquatch-like in appearance.

Is bigfoot a ghost? When you consider all the evidence, this theory is not as absurd as it might seem at first glance. Because that's the problem with a lot of bigfoot research: in order to fit the stories into a 'plausible' theory (bigfoot as a yet-undiscovered man-ape), the researchers have to ignore or discard many reports that contradict it. I'm not sure bigfoot is a ghost (what exactly is a ghost anyway?), but the reality of bigfoot encounters is certainly stranger than most people might think.

The green lights seem to connect bigfoot to ghosts and other paranormal phenomena, which I find intriguing. Do sasquatches and ghosts come and go from the same place?

http://weekinweird.com/2016/12/08/bigfoot-is-a-ghost-interdimensional-sasquatch-tulpas-green-flash/

(Long article, but good.)

>>17629

"we" are were the giants time traveling giants

>favorite Cryptid

Probably Jersey Devil, because I swear on me mum that I saw it when I was with a buddy up there.

>most likely to exist

Lots of Werewolf stories, skinwalkers are also extremely common. So those?

>Which cryptid do you really want to be real?

None. Most would imply that shit is a whole lot more complicated than we know. Imagine if Werewolves existed and we just discovered hard facts to prove it.

>Most Bizarre

Mothman

>Favorite Cryptid Story

Beast of Bray Road

>>17629

>60-120 tons

looool, that's heavy for a gundam, thought rabbis loved math and numbers

>>17530

oh god, I've never even heard of lusca before and it also lives near the Bahamas. Nothing to stop it from swimming over to America.

http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2014/06/the-mysterious-blue-holes-of-the-bahamas/

I won't do the whole list, but my favourite cryptid/one I want to exist is this tiny little zebra-striped animal in Africa, the size of a dog. Just sounds like a comfy pet. Can't recall it's name and it's not on the list of Cryptids on Wikipedia, which is where I first found it.

>>17738

It sounds like there a million monsters out here, but there really isn't.

We do have obscenely strange animals compared to the rest of the world, but things like that giant komodo lizard can't possibly exist without being detected. We do actually monitor the outback for things like Brumby (wild horse) populations, and would notice something like that.

>>17845

>>17858

Probably. There's a bunch of Aboriginal people who have only seen white people when they drop off medical/food supplies.

That being said, there's no pure blooded Aboriginees left, they've all been mixed.

If there were a tribe, they'd be living in the north-west or north-central areas of the country. Everywhere else is fairly populated and explored.

>>17971

>hard to find pandas

They're hard to find as they've been hunted to near extinction.

Anyways, with the rate of forest removal, you'd expect at least 1 of them to of been found.

how cryptic

>>28825

>The traditional way to attract the little people is to leave offerings for them

That's actually the traditional way to attract raccoons and possums.

Kind of related, but I've grown up Christian with Christian parents. Well, they turned Christian when I was around 10 or 11, and I fully accepted Christianity personally when I was around 14. I'm 20 now and still strong in the faith. Anyways, I was always an avid /x/ lurker, and cryptids always fascinated me. So after I read a few stories ITT, I decided to ask them their opinions since they were more theologically literate in this category (my mom being the type that loves alien conspiracies). I was kind of surprised to hear that biblical, there is nothing to discard the existence of most cryptids, especially the skinwalker/goatman/yeti/wendigo kind. Rather, since we are ever so close to the end times, the occurrence of such creatures should be more common. Witchcraft, demon-worship, and the return of all sorts of black arts are probably contributing to these things. Notice how demonic possession was at an all time high when Jesus came around? Likewise it will be when He returns for the second time. That being said:

>Favorite cryptid

Skinwalkers.

>likely to exist

Pretty much all of them.

>REALLY want to be real

Living dinosaurs because I love dinosaurs.

>bizzare

Gnomes

>favourite story

Eh, not really sure. Read too many.