72787e No.16717913
Anyone got any images they saved for later use but never had a chance to use them?
526a18 No.16717939
I'd like to post in a thread like this but the media server is absolutely shitting itself right now.
a92a9b No.16717954
>>16717928
The cuckchan Pokemon house story is blatantly fake and I don't know why you even bothered to save it.
3d5008 No.16717958
>>16717954
>cuckchan
>when I'm the one who capped it right here
Not my fault crossposters come here fuckboy
67476b No.16717961
>>16717958
Oh hey I have that!
a5df89 No.16717964
File: 26f796996df2add⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 62.84 KB, 320x327, 320:327, Exactly what you think it ….png)

67476b No.16717975
>>16717965
No worries, mate.
sage for doublepost.
1b5016 No.16717997
Quick look through some saved images i got. Im sure I could find an excuse for some of them
def261 No.16718003
>>16717913
That Sony image hasn't aged well.
23cc7c No.16718008
>>16717997
>I'm punk so I must rebel
But that would be conforming to being punk. Does that mean by not rebelling you are rebelling?
1b5016 No.16718015
>>16718003
>replace men on xbox cover with manly looking women with guns instead
>Change sony one completely to “Parental type figure walkabout: The over the shoulder movie”
>nintendo honestly just keep the same but maybe add new funky mode
>PC also the same but now with like 200 dlcs
1759c4 No.16718016
>>16718008
>punk, a subculture defined by "rebellion"
>I'm a punk but I'm not rebelling
Then why call yourself a punk at all?
the 400IQ perspective is >implying punk subculture really means anything
4a57a8 No.16718019
I don't post images that often but I always save shit I find so here's a good sized dump of reaction pics and misc I guess.
4a57a8 No.16718041
>>16718033
Some LotGH as an added bonus.
4a57a8 No.16718047
>>16718041
But wait, there's more! Have some Chaika edits I made years ago upon request.
4a57a8 No.16718060
>>16718057
I have a lot more Gaki than I thought…
ee2c27 No.16718070
>>16718058
Fuggin Without, just disappearing like that.
67476b No.16718090
For those that don't remember, there was a thread long ago where an anon with some shitty app on his phone converted random images that emulated hardware graphics of ye olde game systems. I saved them and uploaded it all onto mega for all to grab. But that was around 2015 so I doubt many people downloaded it.
https://mega.nz/#!mJ8TyBhK!Csut5AlJoffT4kkwAePdArBMgzLWvwh6Q0nKPBNZw9c
964f96 No.16718103
>>16717928
>1st image
Is that the manga about the futa girlfriend?
4a57a8 No.16718104
>>16718101
That's all for now. Off to bed.
2f4505 No.16718107
0dafff No.16718167
That episode of Lupin is great by the way.
588d9b No.16718194
>>16717958
>>16717961
>Not posting the superior version
588d9b No.16718199
At least keep it vidya you fags.
fb0181 No.16718216
>>16718208
he doesn't really trip he just literally steps on his own cock
588d9b No.16718225
>>16718216
He is beginning to fall in the third panel.
1b4e47 No.16718245
>>16718103
Is that a thing? Give source.
a1736b No.16718253
>want to participate
>Select/drop/paste files here
>downloads
>realize that your hard drive took a shit last week and you bought a new one
>years worth of meme material lost
backup your shit
588d9b No.16718268
File: 9df5a63be226ff5⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 760.34 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, My great-great-great-great….png)

7157f1 No.16718269
>>16718266
What's the second one about? Some reverse isekai where girls from eroge end up in our world?
588d9b No.16718271
>>16718269
A fujoshit who's never seen uncensored cock.
1759c4 No.16718279
>>16718262
>first one
Sauce? I need context for this.
ade269 No.16718282
>>16718225
>Deepwater jew
I always laugh
588d9b No.16718284
>>16718279
Dragon Quest III for SNES. That's just a lone NPC though.
>>16718281
You do not. Images related.
588d9b No.16718285
File: f57ad04daee5ac5⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 1.37 MB, 1597x896, 1597:896, Tentacucked4 Ramius sucks ….png)

>>16718281
>>16718284
Further images related.
588d9b No.16718287
File: ef12f2f63d98f47⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 1.37 MB, 1597x897, 1597:897, Tentacucked6 unfaithful sl….png)

File: 54cf5f91cdb6600⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 2.16 MB, 1920x1080, 16:9, Super vanilla happy end gu….png)

2ef088 No.16718291
>>16718287
>>16718285
>>16718284
>you do not
>pic related
<opens pics
YES I FUCKING DO
588d9b No.16718296
>>16718291
>Being a cuckold
>Unironically wanting Alicesoft
2ef088 No.16718306
>>16718296
>cuckold
I'm not getting cucked or whatever, the characters in the story are getting cucked. And tentacle raped. And performing patricide and cannibalism.
Do you make the characters in GTA obey the law too so you don't get tagged as a real life felon?
588d9b No.16718311
>>16718306
This is porn game with a male MC. You're meant to self insert. If you do, you are a cuckold. If you don't you're a third party voyuer cuckold.
173875 No.16718325
>>16718311
>You're meant to self insert.
<self inserting
<in anything ever
Though >>16718306 still has shit taste despite being correct about one thing.
ebcab2 No.16718339
708a53 No.16718443
>>16718324
Sauce for the 2nd and 3rd pic please?
b93dc4 No.16718465
>>16718268
Highly accurate and meme free translation, I see.
3d3a6e No.16718482
>>16718465
Of course it is. You and I both know why.
b9beff No.16718504
>>16717993
>Ivysaur was changing from green to blue, then blue to green over and over.
>>16718090
Thanks, forgot to save a few.
>>16718220
MMBN5 surely had a ton of reaction image material.
>>16718301
>Last image
Is that supposed to be a flygon oc?
026ae5 No.16718552
>>16718311
But anon, doesn't continuously playing a game you don't like make you the biggest cuck?
588d9b No.16718558
>>16718552
I was told it was vanilla. I played most of it, but the cuckshit and degeneracy got too bad and I dropped it.
245921 No.16718564
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>16718306
Don't listen to these fags. Evenicle is excellent. One of the better RPG's that I have played in the last five years. Also you never get cucked directly and all the horrible shit in the game is presented as something abhorrent that the characters are fighting against.
026ae5 No.16718565
>>16718558
>I was told it was vanilla
So you got cucked?
588d9b No.16718594
>>16718564
Fuck off nigger. It's literally basic harem shit with shit gameplay like most h-rpgs.
>You never get cucked directly
What the fuck is that supposed to mean? How is the cucking, not "direct" enough? What the fuck even is "indirect cuckoldry"? How is the MC letting a tentacle beast molest his wives, sticking its tentacles in the mouth and vagina of one of them as she unfaithfully gets off on it, and the MC enjoying it fully, not cuckoldry? It fucking astounds me how Evenicle fags will try to defend the game as being vanilla even when presented with the degeneracy in the game. And to top it all off, Rance X confirms the ultimate end of the harem is all the wives getting mindbroken. Because it's fucking Alicesoft.
>all the horrible shit in the game is presented as something abhorrent that the characters are fighting against.
It's a porn game. Any sex scenes in it help define the game's target audience. The good guys not liking it has no relevancy towards the fact that it's there for you to get off to.
b1e7f4 No.16718604
>>16718594
Porn is always degenerate, retard. Also, you sound like a cuck.
d913a5 No.16718691
>>16718076
>Bucket Woman
jesus christ that's an obscure reference
a0ce0e No.16718701
>>16718692
>not being desensitized of all pain and suffering
Yeah, it's not for you then. Seriously though, give it a read sometime, it's got some plotholes and an arc that doesn't go anywhere but it's overall a pretty good story, specially the first half.
2146d4 No.16718745
>tfw mark bans you for dumping images in an image dump thread
You could have atleast left the non related ones alone eh,cakeboy.
btw you just banned a campus wide ip so dont blame me if someone else gets mad because they got banned for no reason
57056c No.16718919
>>16718604
Yes, but in degeracy, like murder, there are degrees and in jail cops who gave too many shoots to a nigger in self defense doesn't get the treatment of a gay body disposal pedo profissional mercenary
6a9f3a No.16719011
>>16717913
finally an excuse to post these
588d9b No.16719020
>>16719011
Those aren't videogames.
d1b130 No.16719027
>>16719020
Ur mum isnt a vidyagame either, but everyone sure plays her!!
0cade9 No.16719159
>>16717913
>underage
Retarded moralfaggot shat this out.
9700e6 No.16719635
de84f7 No.16719747
>>16717921
>1449424838414.png
kindred spirits, you and i
de84f7 No.16719765
>>16718014
please tell me that was you samefagging for the lulz and not an actual post
db782a No.16719870
>>16719833
>the second pic
c30a3e No.16719881
>>16719802
Artist/source on first pic?
05565f No.16719987
>>16719975
I don't know what you're talking about.
a92fdd No.16719991
Sometimes i wonder why do i have a compulsive thing to save images i will rarely or never use, maybe it's because i found them on threads that i liked a long time ago but i ask myself why don't i delete them?
e86f31 No.16719994
Anyone got the pic that quotes about someone's else's dreams being boring? or the girl or trap that says someone who doesn't work their body can't have high expectations for their partners or preference body or something?
ea7722 No.16720017
These are very old. Brings back a lot of memories.
069e6f No.16720027
>>16718058
Those were the fucking days.
845608 No.16720048
I miss the old AA2 threads.
1f007b No.16720062
File: 5c128e31620b9ab⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 107.15 KB, 1001x1500, 1001:1500, cursed bogdanoff furries.jpg)

Dare you enter my magical realm?
5b3b9b No.16720066
>>16719991
>Sometimes i wonder why do i have a compulsive thing to save images i will rarely or never use
Because you desperately want to share your thoughts and emotions with another human being, but you are too autistic to do so. Don't worry anon, we're all right there with you.
6f5afd No.16720113
i've got quite a few images saved over the years. i don't use them because 100% of my time is dedicated to lurking
e9ead1 No.16720120
>>16719738
She was so much better looking at 150 and up than 140 and below, what in the fuck, bitch.
bafdd4 No.16720129
>>16720120
you might be retarded.
845608 No.16720138
>>16720088
You might be right Hitler
d1b130 No.16720155
>>16720088
>That filename
Anon, can you name my son?
04612f No.16720180
>>16720120
yeah what in the fuck is wrong with you ?
749f40 No.16720197
>>16720191
>someone saved my police-car-doing-a-sick-jump screenshot
that's from an episode of X-Files and was my wallpaper for over a year
588d9b No.16720200
>>16720187
I never knew the origin of this. It always felt like barely sentient game characters attempting to question why they are what they are but being incapable of doing so effectively due to autism.
6f3e64 No.16720204
>>16717975
I'd like to know the artist of the first one
bafdd4 No.16720253
>>16720214
meh twatter but I'd fuck this girl
f54aaf No.16720294
>>16718306
>I'm not getting cucked or whatever, i'm just spanking it to cuck porn
>>16718504
>MMBN screencaps
That reminds me
c30a3e No.16720296
9fa91e No.16720318
>>16720197
I thought i recognized it as that Xfiles episode. HOON THAT POLICE CAR AND CHASE THAT XFILE.
b7727d No.16720327
>>16720200
>you will never have a qt barely-sentient game character waifu to guide towards sentience and the dick, of course
b80fe2 No.16720450
>>16720062
I've seen that man in several photos and I never wish to know his name.
6f3e64 No.16720468
>>16720450
I have many undertale images i suppose is time to put them in here
ebef4b No.16720472
>>16717964
Bost the lewd mimics.
b80fe2 No.16720476
>>16720468
I have a folder with 1,382 files of Undertale images. I haven't found them all yet.
DARE YOU ADD TO MY COLLECTION?
NOT KIDDING
fec19d No.16720479
File: c88d6b0cae63b4a⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 474.04 KB, 640x800, 4:5, 0d284f9da2f47b2375578b3c09….png)

File: f17a7ed5a05bde2⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 639.16 KB, 640x800, 4:5, 4c7a9083c733006af213658f5d….png)

a92fdd No.16720490
>>16720479
>Giving anon more Under(his)tale autism on his already bloated collection of it.
b80fe2 No.16720496
>>16720479
Nah, I specifically leave porn out since it's worthless in regards to both rarity and quality of content. The actual good stuff is experimental, or drawn from a wholesome angle of emotion. Exploring certain aspects, telling jokes, what ifs, all of these are valid additions to my autismal magical realm folder.
Porn is right out since it's all the same. What I crave is variety, emotion, weirdness, something uncomfortable but non-sexual, wholesomeness, art. It's a set of conditions that align with what true art, untempered by bitterness and lust. I have many such folders, but this one evokes such a reaction on this board and others, it's a palpable work of art itself, there has never been an identical reaction to these pictures.
fec19d No.16720501
>>16720490
Yeah but anon, Asriel's been a bad boy and he needs to be punished.
b80fe2 No.16720506
>>16720501
The things we have subjected AI to I would never subject upon any being, living, dead, philosophical zombie-esque, and so on.
The inner depths of humanity should never have been explored. Such suffering we have invited upon ourselves by unearthing the madness of fanfics and the inner daemons of imprinted lust of fictional characters.
Shit's fucked, brother.
fec19d No.16720508
>>16720506
The third picture actually broke the download button
ebff1f No.16720509
>undertaint
You faggots ruined that game for me.
b80fe2 No.16720515
>>16720508
I think the AI was telling you to fuck off.
>>16720509
Initially, it was also ruined for me, but then I stopped giving a fuck after someone in my family died.
You start to understand the suffering of people when you undergo the same suffering. It fucks you up, and you need something to fill the hole in your psyche while you recover. And through it, you gain understanding. I don't loathe the communities that surround themselves with shit, I pity them. I weep for them. Because they're also suffering.
Some of them deserve it. But few actually do.
526a18 No.16720527
File: 2bb6bc1b9511cc8⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 240.44 KB, 983x1500, 983:1500, 3d1522dc0de4f74272e264a661….jpg)

>>16718311
>This is porn game with a male MC. You're meant to self insert.
But the MC has a name, and a portrait, and his own lines of dialogue.
I'm not roleplaying as that character, I'm just watching his story unfold.
I am no more self-inserting as the MC in Evinicle than I am the shark in Jaws.
ebff1f No.16720528
>>16720515
lol 3 relatives and my cat died in 16. I hate them because they're degenerate, unprincipled animals, not because I'm emotionally weak.
6f3e64 No.16720532
>>16720479
It's thanks to people like you that they think we're all smut freaks
b80fe2 No.16720536
>>16720528
When you're brought to a moment of weakness, you will either hate yourself, or grow up. It's pretty simple. People aren't born like that. They have to be molded.
ebff1f No.16720545
>>16720536
>you will either hate yourself
Bait?
38fe6b No.16720550
>>16720532
The only thing more pathetic than a tumblrtale fag who only cares about the game because of the porn, is a tumblrtale fag who doesn't.
6f3e64 No.16720565
>>16720550
Pre fixing tumblr onto something instead of actually addressing why you dislike it, truly magnificent
c81253 No.16720577
>>16720565
the game is like 7 years old now and just about everyone on this board that isnt a faggot has already written a paragraph each detailing just how gay that game is and why.
its not his fault that you are new and have shit taste. go educate yourself and play some good games.
f669ad No.16720579
>>16717928
didn't the OP in the second pic try to claim he had like skipped 8 years of school?
I remember some thread on here like that where the OP complained as a kid that he couldnt get out of the house in blue/red and autistically tried to defend himself by claiming he was some 2smart4u prodigy and he was stressed bc of it
38fe6b No.16720580
>>16720565
>passive aggressive sarcasm
Don't need to address anything. (You) proved it's shit because you like it.
6f3e64 No.16720598
c81253 No.16720602
>>16720598
>first letter capitalized but no punctuation
this is the telltale sign of a phoneposter. not surprising that someone new and someone that likes such a shitty game would be a normalfag phoneposter.
i just explained to you that the topic has been discussed for 7 years solid already. no one gives a fuck or even remembers it anymore except you. so it's your job to go research why it's a hated, faggot game here if you care so much. newfag fucking retard
38fe6b No.16720605
>>16720598
Try becoming heterosexual.
2c8a59 No.16720608
>>16718008
>>16718016
"Punk" stopped being punk when rebellion against the system became commercialized with pop punk in the 90s. A band like Green day isn't rebellion against anything it's just a pop band with punk elements
6f3e64 No.16720609
>>16720602
>>16720605
You're still not presenting any arguments
It brings joy to my day to see you be buttmad.
348786 No.16720610
Does anyone of you guys have the one screencap about an anon powering up his Fly Swatter to transform mosquitos from a solid state to magma? I keep looking and I can't find it anywhere.
c81253 No.16720613
>>16720609
the arguments were made 7 years ago and you missed them. now youre asking people to spoonfeed your new ass
dac6aa No.16720617
>>16720613
Undertale is only 4 years old you retard.
c81253 No.16720619
>>16720617
it feels longer. even worse then. dude hasnt even been around image boards for 4 years lol
dac6aa No.16720622
>>16720619
I don't think you've been around long either since even when people were shitting on Undertale when it came out, you could find threads where the game was given due praise as well. Hell, I remember people shilling the demo back when it was new.
38fe6b No.16720623
>>16720609
Tell you what. I'm feeling pretty low energy right now so I'll just give you the kill shot so c81253 doesn't bust an artery over this.
>you have to set fags up with each other twice to get the best ending
Don't bother trying to counter this, because you can't.
7bc1f4 No.16720624
>>16720614
I like my version better.
c81253 No.16720627
>>16720622
the demo threads were the only ones with praise from everyone. once the actual game came out threads were derailed and autolocked within a month.
five nights at freddys is another one that /v/ liked initially and i have no idea why. i guess stylistically it's cool.
263f3c No.16720639
>>16717982
I remember that demon
d0be60 No.16720648
>>16720624
>>16720614
Why do they always take off their clothes?
37a37d No.16720664
>>16720509
>Last image
Sad just how fucking true that is, even on imageboards. "Trolling" went a similar way.
c4f725 No.16720665
>>16720648
because they are savages, witches, cultists and satanists. mad lunatics that know they have ugly disgusting bodies and want to spread their negative, bitter energy to others by displaying such ugliness. there is a reason why all the ancient codes of even the most primitive tribes have some sorta dress code; because human beings deserve some shred of dignity and respect, and walking around naked in public is for fucking apes, even nigger tribes in africa will have some kinda law about having to wear a loincloth or something.
this decade they will be taking off their clothes; next decade they will be skinning babies and rubbing their entrails all over them before running around naked and screeching about womens rights, mark my word. look how much they promote witchcraft in feminism these days and try to spin it as "free and wild feminist paganism opposed to oppressive patriarchal Christianity"
jokes on them, the first witch hunters were pagans, and their ancient order will soon be revived when western men get tired of this bullshit. dark, cthonic and feminine energy can only rule over the male psyche for so long before it drives it into a murderous fucking rampage.
seriously i wish i was kidding, i went to art school for several years, trust me i was in with the enemy, i know these fucking people, they seriously are satanists, black magic users, occultists, pedophiles and creeps, ive heard weird hippie girls with ouija board t-shirts talking about how stem cells can be used for de-aging creams, and ive heard weirdo satanists with pentagram patches on their faggy jackets talking about communist revolutions, yes satanic communism i know how stupid that idea is, dont underestimate stupidity however. the most dangerous movements are led by the ignorant, stupid and blind
638860 No.16720671
>>16720648
I don't think they could give you an accurate or consistent answer, but I have a few jumbled thoughts they might piece together.
>My body, my rules
>Still not asking to be raped
>Still not asking to be looked at sexually (the "male gaze")
>I'm not a sex object
>The feminine form is nothing to be ashamed about
>The feminine form is something to be celebrated
Of course the last two points only applies to them and their associates. Women who actually do take pride in their appearance and maybe even use it for personal gain are their number one enemy followed by fictional women of every kind.
>>16720665
This too.
263f3c No.16720672
>>16720664
>>16720509
Newspeak is quite scary and I wouldn't be surprised if these particular instances (among others) were deliberate.
539b22 No.16720680
>>16720672
The first image is a shop, and a well known one at that.
I forgot if the original was an Xbone or a PS4 but it wasn't a Switch.
6f3e64 No.16720682
>>16720617
Don't argue with them, they're from reddit
post more undertale anyways
38fe6b No.16720694
>>16720682
>clamors desperately for an argument
>I post one
<"d-don't argue with them"
4a57a8 No.16720700
>>16720682
One of the few games to have a general had to be removed because the community was to autistic and shit to rationally deal with. You fags outlasted the Overwatch threads in duration before mods had to step in.
Don't even try and argue. Your time has been up from the start.
6f3e64 No.16720703
>>16720700
Your argument applies to the community not the game.
The game itself is fine.
37a37d No.16720710
>>16720672
>I wouldn't be surprised if these particular instances (among others) were deliberate.
Most likely. If you can't remove a culture outright, subvert, pollute, and corrupt it into something unrecognizable.
263f3c No.16720729
>>16720680
Well, it still fits the theme of the thread.
4a57a8 No.16720754
>>16720703
The game itself is pretentious and limited. It has a few solid tracks and a novel idea as far as the bullet hell mechanic is concerned but it's a waste of time as it's not implemented at all well. It instead gets autists like you to like it with small little set pieces Instead an actual story or product. We get a "game" that's to focused on the narrative instead of the gameplay and the narrative is bland and shit.
Meta concepts were old by the 3rd act of Blazing Saddles. And anybody fooled by the exp twist was to underage to play a game with the themes the game proposed in the first place (mass genocide, butter OC insert, ect). The game is nothing special. It's just overrated. Toby was just smart enough to give it mystery elements that keep the hardcore cringe tier fans hooked so they could attract the attention of lesser autists into thinking the game is worth looking into.
c38a91 No.16720810
>>16720528
>1st pic
Any more on art?
c0f43c No.16720812
>>16718225
>Link Belmont
It's obviously meant to be Ivy.
c38a91 No.16720824
>>16720710
>>16720664
>>16720672
>"Trolling" went a similar way.
Can you please describe what trolling breaks down too then?
b9a37d No.16720844
>>16718594
>Tentacle monster sex
>Same as cuckoldry
Fucking a tentacle monster is equal to using a fucking vibrator in my eyes. That being said, the fact that Rance X shows the harem getting mind broken is fucking awful and sad. As someone who only played Rance, what the fuck happened? I mean, aren't those two series in different worlds completely?
a193e1 No.16720905
>>16720844
A dildo is an inanimate object. A tentacle monster is a living being that fucks your women purposely, so you are being cheated on with it, same with, say, a dog.
Are you towercuck, by any chance? I bet you think subverse will be a great game, cuck.
>what the fuck happened?
AliceSoft can't make a game without it being cuckshit. Same with shit like Shit Lilith. I learned that the bad way playing Toushin Toshi 2, and I was willing to forgive it seeing how it was a 90s RPG h game, but seeing how they keep doing that crap even now, they deserve the rope.
ebff1f No.16720944
>>16718594
>2D is cuckoldry
We've came full circle.
a193e1 No.16720952
>>16720944
Blame cucks that forced their shit fetish into everyone and everything. Particularly western audiences.
c2a445 No.16720966
>>16718008
>Does that mean by not rebelling you are rebelling?
Didn't you know? Conservatism is the new counterculture.
b9a37d No.16720971
>>16720905
Tentacle monster is a fictional non-intelligent being, it can do something purposely, it is too dumb to do that, it works just by instincts alone. A dog at least has some conciousness. No I'm not a tower cuck, you fucking faggot.
And that doesn't answer my question. I was asking what exactly happened. Those games are set in different worlds, then how did the harem end up like this?
a193e1 No.16720977
>>16720971
>it works just by instincts alone
Still living and still fucking your girl.
>And that doesn't answer my question
It does. It's alicesoft, alicesoft do this shit all the time, so expecting anything other than this in an alicesoft game is retarded.
b9a37d No.16720983
>>16720977
>Still living and still fucking your girl
By this fucking logic I should worry myself about the girl pleasuring herself with a fucking cucumber.
And no it doesn't, because I'm asking about what exactly happened and not a throwaway "It's Alicesoft" line. Was this some dimension-travel bullshit or is this just a reference?
b9a37d No.16720985
>>16720963
Both the old and modern approaches are dogshit, you cannot put strict rules upon art as there are too many variables and exceptions to consider, but that doesn't mean that there is no value difference between what is good and bad art. A perspectivist approach to art is superior to both objectivist and relativist approaches.
a193e1 No.16721003
>>16720983
>the girl pleasuring herself with a fucking cucumber.
Why would she if you should be man enough to please her? Also, the cucumber is under her control. Why getting so defensive, cuck? Tentacle is a shit fetish.
>And no it doesn't, because I'm asking about what exactly happened and not a throwaway "It's Alicesoft" line
But that's literally the reason, faggot.
>>16720985
The video raises a great point, the impressionists delivered great works in their first generations, but lacking any kind of standards leads to what we have today. There's no way of improve if you don't even understand what made art good before.
A perspectivist approach still falls under a subjective opinion of whether it is good or not. And even though you don't exactly need your art to be objectively good to qualified critics to be good art, if these objective standards are not held up you are still going to get bloody pads as art.
b9a37d No.16721038
>>16721003
>Why would she if you should be man enough to please her? Also, the cucumber is under her control. Why getting so defensive, cuck? Tentacle is a shit fetish.
To make an interesting scene in fiction you faggot. And doesn't fucking matter, the tentacle monster has the intelligence of a cucumber, it is not a person, it cannot fucking cuck you.
>Bringing up arguments is now being defensive.
Wew, nice try faggot.
>But that's literally the reason, faggot.
If you are too dumb to understand the fucking question then don't bother answering.
>There's no way of improve if you don't even understand what made art good before.
And forcing strict standards is not going to make you understand that either, art serves a purpose, a piece of art takes on a goal and tries to accomplish it. Art can be judged on the basis of how well it does that and how helpful and/or valit thee message is as well as other factors as subjective view of the art. The problem is that good art can be created by doing the opposite of the established standards of the past.
>A perspectivist approach still falls under a subjective opinion of whether it is good or not.
And what is exactly wrong with that? The problem is that the viewpoints of people are considered equal, not that art is judged in a subjective manner. Art is neither subjective nor objective, but it is a little bit of both. To say that the subjective opinion doesn't matter is ridiculous but so is to say that there is not objectivity in it. And besides, trying to judge art by "objective standards" is just trying to judge art by standards that people have agreed on, which are ironicalyy subjective. The problem with modern art is not that it allows for subjective opinion of itself, but that it treats only the subjective opinion as important.
>if these objective standards are not held up you are still going to get bloody pads as art.
If these objective standards are held up, you're going to get thousands of pieces of shit and boring art in exchange. There were great writers like Dostoyevsky in the past, but there were also absolute hacks which are put on pedestal for no fucking reason other than that they impacted the culture (often in negative ways) and because they fit in with the current standards (some of romanticism's writers immediately come to mind not saying that romanticism is bad, just that it really had its fair share of hacks) Shit art will be made no matter what you do, the point it to not put it on the pedestal and not limit creative freedom at the same time.
dac6aa No.16721070
>>16721038
>art serves a purpose, a piece of art takes on a goal and tries to accomplish it. Art can be judged on the basis of how well it does that and how helpful and/or valit thee message is as well as other factors as subjective view of the art.
Judging art on how well it gets it message across is all fine and dandy, but you still get shitheads who think a kiddy pool of flamin hots is an evocative message for reasons even they cannot articulate what that message is. Saying there shouldn't be any "objective" rules of art is what's led to the hacks of today being able to pass off literal garbage as art. I can't say the "subjective opinion of artistic standard" experiment succeeded in the long run.
a193e1 No.16721082
>>16721038
>To make an interesting scene in fiction you faggot
<I can only get off at other things fucking my girls
Kill yourself, cuck.
>the tentacle monster has the intelligence of a cucumber
Last time I checked, cucumbers didn't crawl out of the fridge to fuck your girls, and even if they did, I wouldn't find that hot, cuck.
>Wew
<I'm totally not mad
>If you are too dumb to understand the fucking question then don't bother answering
That's the answer, just because you don't want to acknowledge it doesn't change this.
>a piece of art takes on a goal and tries to accomplish it
And how the fuck will you accomplish it if you don't know how, retard? Expression alone won't make you good at any art style or magically give you a new art style at all. If you don't even know how the fuck the human body is you can't even express movement. Formal studies in art are as important as in any other subject.
>The problem is that good art can be created by doing the opposite of the established standards of the past.
Then you put standards to that new form of art, faggot, that's the whole point. But the thing is, you can't go against those standards if you don't know what those standards are in the first place.
>And what is exactly wrong with that?
That you'll have pretentious faggots claiming what they have is good and selling it for billions even if it's just a woman shitting on the street. It's retarded.
>just trying to judge art by standards that people have agreed on, which are ironicalyy subjective
Holy shit, retard, the fact that a big group of qualified people agrees in something subjective makes it an objective qualification. It's literally the whole basis of society, or are you going to pull "it's just a social construct!" now? How else do you expect things to be judged? "I find this piece of shit on the street nice so it is obviously worth billions of dollars", and honestly, it's fair if you are willing to pay for it, but it isn't if you plan to display it as fine art in a museum.
>you're going to get thousands of pieces of shit and boring art in exchange
>but there were also absolute hacks which are put on pedestal for no fucking reason other than that they impacted the culture
So just like now! Except instead of "boring" art you have shocking shit for the sake of being shocking, and it's still manipulated by a couple of faggots getting rich on these concepts of no standards because "IT'S BOLD AND NEW AND HAS A REALLY AMAZING MESSAGE! IT'S TOTALLY NOT A WOMAN PISSING!". What is the difference between "boring art" and modern shit? Boring art takes effort and knowledge in order to be pulled correctly, and that alone makes it good art.
>Shit art will be made no matter what you do, the point it to not put it on the pedestal and not limit creative freedom at the same time.
Except, no, it isn't about limiting creative freedom, it's about letting there pretentious faggots that any brain fart they can have is not worth calling art. Also, you keep talking how art can be done without standards, but that's hard to do when these hacks don't even know what these standards are. It's the basis of the whole education and knowledge concept, you need to know the past in order to improve the future and avoid the same errors people before you have done, that's why even subjects like history of the art are so important for fucking artists.
Your argument is the equivalent of saying walking simulators are good games because of their message they convey. But I'm not surprised coming from a faggot that likes tentacle porn.
588d9b No.16721104
>>16720971
>Tentacle monster is a fictional non-intelligent being
>Non-intelligent
Not in this game you dumb nigger.
b9a37d No.16721107
>>16721070
As I said, the problem is fixed if opinions are not valued equally. Then the shitheads can be criticized for their opinion being worse.
>>16721082
>I can only get off at other things fucking my girls
>Implying I said that anywhere.
>Last time I checked, cucumbers didn't crawl out of the fridge to fuck your girls, and even if they did, I wouldn't find that hot, cuck.
I don't think you have reading comprehension retard.
>I'm totally not mad
I'm totally not a fucking faggot.
>That's the answer, just because you don't want to acknowledge it doesn't change this.
No you fucking faggot, I've been asking what happened in-universe, how was this explained and the only answer you've given me is "It's Alice Soft", your reading comprehension is dogshit.
>And how the fuck will you accomplish it if you don't know how, retard? Expression alone won't make you good at any art style or magically give you a new art style at all. If you don't even know how the fuck the human body is you can't even express movement. Formal studies in art are as important as in any other subject.
Nigger, did you even read my post? I never said that people shouldn't be learning how to draw, what I'm arguing against is the idea of objective strict standards and seeing art from objectivist approach. Did you even read the part where I said that art is both subjective and objective at the same time, and that both of those should be taken into account? What I mean is that you cannot create strict rules for art, that doesn't mean that you cannot create any loose guidelines on how to do good art.
>Then you put standards to that new form of art, faggot, that's the whole point. But the thing is, you can't go against those standards if you don't know what those standards are in the first place.
As I said, why not just look at the standards as guidelines rather than strict rules for the art pieces to be judged by instead of judging them on a more individual basis?
>Holy shit, retard, the fact that a big group of qualified people agrees in something subjective makes it an objective qualification. It's literally the whole basis of society, or are you going to pull "it's just a social construct!" now? How else do you expect things to be judged? "I find this piece of shit on the street nice so it is obviously worth billions of dollars", and honestly, it's fair if you are willing to pay for it, but it isn't if you plan to display it as fine art in a museum.
No it doesn't you fucking faggot, this is bandwagon fallacy, the fact that a large portion of qualified people agree on something doesn't make it fucking right you stupid cunt. There is no good way of going about this, the best you can do is to judge every art piece individually and let the audience sort it out.
>So just like now! Except instead of "boring" art you have shocking shit for the sake of being shocking, and it's still manipulated by a couple of faggots getting rich on these concepts of no standards because "IT'S BOLD AND NEW AND HAS A REALLY AMAZING MESSAGE! IT'S TOTALLY NOT A WOMAN PISSING!". What is the difference between "boring art" and modern shit?
The difference is that now actually good artists have more freedom to do more things, while the pretentious faggots will be always there. When pretentious faggots weren't jerking off to "breaking grounds", they were jerking off to the "standards" you are talking about.
>Boring art takes effort and knowledge in order to be pulled correctly, and that alone makes it good art.
Most of the boring art was effortless shit copypasted from current trends, often serving no other meaning than to wang creator's ass though I'm mostly referring to writing here.
Your argument is the equivalent of not reading the post and shitting on your keyboard. But I'm not surprised coming from a retard.
>>16721104
Then fair point, that's a different case entirely.
dac6aa No.16721145
>>16721107
>the problem is fixed if opinions are not valued equally
But in order to do that you have to have rules and standards, a way to tell people what has more merit than others and why this is the case. So we go back to the change in history when the impressionists took over. Things were still good, people were more free to explore all these modern concepts but there was still rigor and skill at play since they were coming from that background of strict standards and evaluation.
But as those skills and concepts of how to present a message or just compose a piece of art degraded things went to shit. Fast forward to the present and look at what we have now. I'm not sure what "hacks" of the past did that had a negative impact but is it worse than the landscape that art exists in now? Which isn't to say the same criticisms raised in the video about art sales driving the direction of popular art wasn't true even back then. Academia controlling art is what led to the impressionists in the first place. But I'll take the Classical standards that led to the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel over any modern art piece any day.
a193e1 No.16721153
>>16721107
>Implying I said that anywhere.
See >>16721038
>To make an interesting scene in fiction you faggot
<The only way it can be interesting for me is if something else is fucking my girl
Cuck.
>I don't think you have reading comprehension retard.
You tell me, you are the faggot saying that cucumbers are the same as monsters that purposedly fuck your women, instinct or not, same as dogs.
>I've been asking what happened in-universe
The in universe explanation is literally alicesoft, retard.
>What I mean is that you cannot create strict rules for art
Except you can and you should because otherwise you'd have these pretentious hobos submitting shit art to art galleries and people praising it. Just look at the 4th pic here >>16720944 If by all means you just want to create whatever you want and call it art, exhibit at your garage, unless you indeed have something to show for those rules.
>why not just look at the standards as guidelines rather than strict rules for the art pieces to be judged by instead of judging them on a more individual basis?
Why not both? If you indeed manage to create something that doesn't fit in any of the previous guidelines, then any subsequent person that do something similar needs and will be judged by these new guidelines, but by merits on it's own. Art-styles aren't merely copying the work of someone else, it's understanding why it exists in the first place, it's history and technique, and I bring this because this is a valid way to judge if a piece of art is well done or not.
>>16721107
>the fact that a large portion of qualified people agree on something doesn't make it fucking right you stupid cunt
I guess I should start a killing spree because even if a large number of people agreed that killing is bad, it's just a social construct. Kill yourself, retard, suicide is also a social construct.
>and let the audience sort it out.
Except for all you know the audience is full of fucking idiots who have no idea about art, and the only worth they have is what they are willing to pay. So you either handle art as an expression, or as an spectacle, and it's funny coming from someone who just cried about bandwagon fallacy.
>The difference is that now actually good artists have more freedom to do more things
Yeah, and they are buried under the shithead that submitted a woman pissing as art. And even if you use internet as an argument, you have plenty of deviantart tier inflation porn. Also, freedom to do more things doesn't equal to better art, idiot. Even with all the censorship artists faced they were able to subtlety expressing their messages without it being so in your face as it is now because of their freedom. Since you are talking about writing you have the divine comedy, which is still a classic today and it was one of the few of it's kind back in the day, despite Dante literally having little freedom to do so or to even distribute it.
>Then fair point, that's a different case entirely.
It isn't. It's the same shit, sentient or not it's a living thing that would fuck your girl.
Kill yourself, cuck. Your understanding of art is as good as your taste in fetishes.
7bc1f4 No.16721170
>>16721145
>>16721153
>>16721107
>>16721104
>>16721082
>>16721070
>>16721038
>>16720985
>>16720983
>>16720977
>>16720971
MUM AND DAD STOP FIGHTING
<i can't stop arguing son, there's someone with a different opinion to me on the internet
Good fucking lord post fucking pictures you faggots.
f6a296 No.16721193
>>16721170
>9gag
Now this is LOL
b9a37d No.16721198
>>16721153
>To make an interesting scene in fiction you faggot
I never fucking said that it's the only way that it can be interesting, and your reading comprehension is still fucking dogshit because I was talking about a cucumber.
>You tell me, you are the faggot saying that cucumbers are the same as monsters that purposedly fuck your women, instinct or not, same as dogs.
A dog has an intelligence enough to be considered a being, almost a person even. A tentacle monster doesn't have that, it is not a person though as one anon pointed out it is different in Evenlice, then fair enough, I was wrong about that and it is indeed cuck shit, but I assumed that it was unintelligent.
>Except you can and you should because otherwise you'd have these pretentious hobos submitting shit art to art galleries and people praising it.
Pretentious fucking faggots have been selling art for fucking centuries you fucking retard, it's not a new thing. What form it happens in doesn't fucking matter.
>Why not both?
Because there is no fucking need, I never said that those aren't valid ways to judge, what I'm saying is that there needs not to be a strict way of thinking about art as it was in the past, and we can go for a middleground.
>I guess I should start a killing spree because even if a large number of people agreed that killing is bad, it's just a social construct. Kill yourself, retard, suicide is also a social construct.
I guess communists really were right then, and seeing how many people right now are supporting modern art, I guess that modern art is alright too :^ )
>Except for all you know the audience is full of fucking idiots who have no idea about art, and the only worth they have is what they are willing to pay. So you either handle art as an expression, or as an spectacle, and it's funny coming from someone who just cried about bandwagon fallacy.
You really cannot fucking read, I said that there is no better way of doing this as of right now, not that this is a good way to do things. You have no fucking gurantee that the audience won't be a bunch of retards no matter what you do.
>Yeah, and they are buried under the shithead that submitted a woman pissing as art. And even if you use internet as an argument, you have plenty of deviantart tier inflation porn.
And in the past plenty of good art was buried under creations that didn't fucking deserve the spotlight, not much different really.
>Also, freedom to do more things doesn't equal to better art, idiot.
Strawman, I didn't fucking say that. There is a bigger chance of creating something interesting and original, doesn't mean that there will be more better art.
>It isn't. It's the same shit, sentient or not it's a living thing that would fuck your girl.
Nigger, a person can't fucking cuck you.
>>16721170
Fair enough, I'll stop responding after this post and just post some pics if I have any.
7bc1f4 No.16721214
>>16721180
>post pictures
<no
<posts picture
have i been rused?
a193e1 No.16721248
>>16721198
>I never fucking said that it's the only way that it can be interesting
But you imply that it can be interesting that way, which it isn't, so it is interesting for you in that way. And, again, tentacle porn is not even close to a fucking cucumber in literally any way unless the cucumber can move on it's own.
>A dog has an intelligence enough to be considered a being, almost a person even. A tentacle monster doesn't have that, it is not a person
The intelligence of the dog is irrelevant, faggot, the point is that is a living thing, out of your or her control, fucking her. So whether if it is instinct or intelligence is irrelevant, the fact that you let something that moves on it's own that purposely fucks your girl, it's cuckshit.
>Pretentious fucking faggots have been selling art for fucking centuries you fucking retard, it's not a new thing. What form it happens in doesn't fucking matter.
And the point would be preventing that, faggot.
>and we can go for a middleground.
And I agree with you, which is why both are perfectly valid.
>I guess communists really were right then, and seeing how many people right now are supporting modern art, I guess that modern art is alright too
Except people that supports communism are not a majority or not even qualified to even agree with something like that. That's the point of having people that actually knows about the subject instead of any hobo.
>I said that there is no better way of doing this as of right now
>You have no fucking gurantee that the audience won't be a bunch of retards no matter what you do.
The audience is fucking irrelevant when you can't know for sure the public won't be a bunch of philistine, so stop catering or even caring about the audience and actually give a shit about the opinion of people that know about the subject, that's the better way of doing it. And you know, it's like any critic, the point is having more than one critic appreciating it.
>that didn't fucking deserve the spotlight
Except they did because they were properly done. Otherwise they wouldn't be the biggest pieces of art today, because if you were right, that people would be discredited.
>There is a bigger chance of creating something interesting and original,
Just like there's a way bigger change of creating garbage, and the problem here is that garbage is being validated.
>a person can't fucking cuck you.
I won't be a nigger and acknowledge that you meant to say a person can cuck you, and yet, you are still wrong. It doesn't need to be a person, it needs to be a thing, any thing, if it goes out of your control, or hers, and if she or you or both enjoy it, cuck. If she enjoys getting raped by a tentacle monster, sentient or not, you are a cuck. If she just masturbates with a cucumber, it's her moving it with her hand, so it's her doing, she is basically doing herself, not a tentacle monster doing her. See the difference?
>>16721214
No.
1f007b No.16721253
This is on the same level as “all porn is cuck porn because you’re not having sex”
Take some pics
a193e1 No.16721268
>>16721253
Except that's pretty much true, you are getting off to some faggot fucking a woman you find attractive. You are a faggot and a cuck. Have some pics.
1f007b No.16721272
>>16721268
That’s stupid, you’re stupid.
Have some pics.
a193e1 No.16721282
>>16721272
I don't really care about what a cuck have to say.
Also, normal porn is for normalfags. If you don't have a way to self-insert, you are a cuck. Only other option than that is solo.
88a82b No.16721287
File: 60312341cebdfa6⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 1.29 MB, 1280x1424, 80:89, 0cf60198fadfdc40614ae37d08….jpg)

File: a2f1bbb8e35d3c4⋯.jpeg (Spoiler Image, 999.17 KB, 1764x1692, 49:47, 68088395dffa3b34c305d8156….jpeg)

File: efe90759b0b014a⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 426.11 KB, 1200x938, 600:469, 56c4b9d8fc2e1c7e12d42b27a3….jpg)

File: 392a4383ebe2463⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 810.76 KB, 1600x1272, 200:159, f6646bdd6c76a4a1031f719e9e….jpg)

File: b57b86472c13235⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 455.82 KB, 1400x993, 1400:993, becb93a309afb5f3aeb9df59ab….jpg)

1f007b No.16721288
>>16721282
You can go ahead and keep being retarded, it’s no skin off my back.
Have some pics.
a193e1 No.16721293
>>16721288
Whatever you say, reddit spacing cuck.
1f007b No.16721299
>>16721293
I’ll reddit space your mom you delusional fag boy.
Have some pics.
a193e1 No.16721302
>>16721299
Kill yourself, reddit spacing cuck.
c93b66 No.16721303
>>16721287
This artist has a thing for inter-racial, but specifically between North Korean, South Korean and American servicemen.I really wanna know what kicked off that fetish for them. The art's cute, as well.
1f007b No.16721308
>>16721302
No u.
Have some pics.
a193e1 No.16721313
>>16721303
He's probably south or north korean. Art is nice, but orgies are for fags.
>Being naked in the same room as another man having sex.
>>16721308
Kill yourself, reddit spacing cuck.
132c1a No.16721314
>>16718295
Any games like the one in 4th and 5th pic? I love the concept of combining an actually good survival horror game and H content, this game was great for that
88a82b No.16721317
>>16721303
He might have been enlisted and had a thing for sex in the military but not gay.
1f007b No.16721318
>>16721313
No u 2x
Have some pics.
dac6aa No.16721325
>>16721170
>Good fucking lord post fucking pictures you faggots.
no
a193e1 No.16721326
>>16721314
Wasn't that the game where in the end you were just punished in hell for aborting your kid or something?
Female MC games are for faggots too, and that's an horror game, not a survival horror one, if it's the one I think it is. A better game for that is A Zombie's Life as long as you don't get melee weapons, which cheese the game.
>>16721318
Kill yourself, reddit spacing cuck
132c1a No.16721333
>>16721326
no, the ending to this one is that you got "rescued" off the island by koreans, and they continued the lewd experiments on you in korea. there is a good ending where you actually escape, too, I guess, but I think you got the wrong game on your mind
1f007b No.16721335
>>16721326
No u 3x whos gonna run out of pics first?
Have some pics.
a193e1 No.16721349
>>16721333
I see. Still, doubt I'll play it, it sounds interesting but, as I said, female MC porn games are for faggots.
Give A zombie's life a try, and remember, no melee.
>>16721335
I don't compete with cucks.
1f007b No.16721366
>>16721349
Then I win by default :^)
132c1a No.16721368
>>16721349
that's the think, this isn't a porn game as much as it is a horror survival game where you're naked, the rape is just the natural result of getting tackled by the enemies, rather than the focus. The gameplay is much better than the porngames as well, it's an actual adventure that is worth sinking your teeth into at least once
But I suppose there aren't any other games like it, no, maybe aside from anthrophobia or whatever it was, but that is mainly a porn game with survival horror elements rather than a survival horror game with hentai
132c1a No.16721375
>>16721368
that's the thing
a193e1 No.16721383
>>16721368
Well, dunno, the fact that rape is the lost condition is pretty shit in my eyes. I'd play a SFW version.
88a82b No.16721392
>>16721388
rest in peace forgot to spoiler
b80fe2 No.16721399
>>16721368
No one ever makes a game where sex is the win condition. Like beat a level, you get to beat off, or you ara ara that monster lord into embarrassment. If you lose, it just sets you back and if you want to see the other animations you have to specifically lose to certain other enemies, which while it is a skill in itself, it's boring as shit because you basically do a bunch of waiting.
I'd prefer a game with good gameplay and a few choice, high quality scenes, rather then a poorly designed fuckfest of a loss condition game. You should have to work to bang the dark lord. Japanese are too insecure to portray a woman who's sexually intimidating, Bayonetta was an achievement.
a193e1 No.16721430
File: f47d61a695d763a⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 2.49 MB, 3200x2134, 1600:1067, f47d61a695d763ac018aa426ae….png)

File: d71abb9a299c9a9⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 118.52 KB, 1500x500, 3:1, d71abb9a299c9a9be72e667809….png)

File: 25f30948615bcc8⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 1.11 MB, 1317x892, 1317:892, 25f30948615bcc8f41fef50da0….png)

File: efd5c7b2f94238a⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 190.62 KB, 1320x874, 660:437, 6f7d26038cffab1d41e2bcd7d6….png)

>>16721399
There are games that rewards you from playing good, even if in a mediocre way, but they do. For example, even though losing makes the monster rape you in Eroico, if you beat them and the level you unlock all the monster scenes in the area in the gallery, so it's pointless to lose on purpose if beating the game score you their sex scenes.
In FoBS you need to to beat the enemies in specific ways in order to unlock their scenes, and use some abilities in hidden areas to unlock alternative scenes that you would normally not get. Those are honestly the best games I've played. There's also WIATWA3DA? which was actually a really great game in which nudity was second but a nice bonus. Shame the dev went full cuck.
Here's a download link. https://mega.nz/#!4M5kAKhK!3LWROBziBMZbC-L19J1nD-rjzySKq2uklflbecRsTkA
1f007b No.16721448
>>16721399
I’m surprised there’s no ryouna games where you just beat women up and have your way with them. Also rance exists.
132c1a No.16721457
>>16721450
>chris chan is a tranny now
<you will never be able to post about his meme medallion again like it is relevant again
dac6aa No.16721471
>>16721348
There is always more room for abh
53b5bf No.16721473
>>16721399
Play Lulu Farea. You just get killed if you lose, raping the monstergirl is only rewarded to a conqueror. It's legitimately challenging and I'd dare say it's almost impossible to get the "best ending" on your first playthrough since it takes immense amounts of planning.
191de8 No.16721475
I have literally an entire folder of images I meant to use for reactions but never do.
1f007b No.16721485
>>16721479
Gotta admit, that spy one is pretty good.
132c1a No.16721550
>>16721523
I don't see why 1984 is on there, it's more or less just a starting place for people who are seeing (((coincidences))). And it's not like it's wrong, the world is slowly becoming more and more like in the novel by the day, everything else there is correct, tho
0e337c No.16721557
>>16721550
If you dont know why 1984 is there then you are too blinded by kikery
ebff1f No.16721577
>>16721550
1984 is indeed a good book, but it's there because the same dipshits who unironically think the horseshoe theory is real, wear fedoras, watch sargon and shove fruits up their anus think it's some revelation and constantly mention it, thinking they look intellectual for doing so.
e68d68 No.16721592
>>16721580
That was a spectacular thread.
588d9b No.16721690
>>16721473
Do you have a solution for getting the best ending on hard mode? I can't even beat it on hard.
588d9b No.16721695
>>16721557
>Anti-communism is kikery
0e337c No.16721710
>>16721695
1984 is anti capitalist, animal farm is anti communist. both are kikeshit.
And it wasnt predicting anything that was happening in the future like every faggot thinks, it was just documenting how the UK actually worked at the time
0196fe No.16721767
>>16718288 (checked)
Ah, quality big posting.
c2a445 No.16721776
>>16721710
>1984 is anti capitalist
1984 was a jab at Stalin. You sure you're not thinking of Brave New World?
53b5bf No.16721789
>>16721710
>animal farm is anti communist.
The author was communist at the time of writing Animal Farm. It wasn't anti-communism it was anti-stalinism.
22730d No.16721797
>>16720729
>2nd pic
I see you're a man on exquisite taste as well.
0e337c No.16721800
>>16721776
>>16721789
>1984 was anti stalin
>no, animal farm was anti stalin
Who was in the right here?
50c7de No.16721807
File: c0e1b60d579f858⋯.gif (Spoiler Image, 13.48 MB, 618x307, 618:307, v's relationship with Koji….gif)

>file size limit was 8 mb when TPP came out
>>16721800
Animal Farm was anti-Stalin, 1984 was just Orwell's autobiography
0196fe No.16721809
>>16718292
>second one
>Donald hardly exists
on fucking point.
>>16720090
>>16720066
7288fc No.16721917
>>16721475
These are some ai generated people aren't they?
0e337c No.16721926
70b6a2 No.16722021
>>16718241
looks more like darkeater midir tbh
a0ce0e No.16722228
>>16719833
>last pic
>south american god
<quetzalcoatl
588d9b No.16722278
>>16721957
>4th image
>chaos
That's just libertarian left.
b12ca9 No.16722324
>>16722278
anarchy=/=chaos
d63021 No.16722996
>>16722378
What was the story behind this again? All I remember is
>he was destroyed
3e5a92 No.16723075
>>16722996
>he was destroyed
Is the Asian guy in
>>16722378
The guy who mad that Minecraft joke book where all the jokes seemed like their were written by a genuine autist with no idea of what humor is?
What’s the fuck is the rest of that shit then?
dd35ae No.16723094
>>16723075
Wut? Now you made me curious.
3e5a92 No.16723211
>>16723094
I don’t know what going going on in
>>16722378
But when >>16722996 quoted “he was destroyed” I assumed he was referencing a Minecraft joke book that had jokes like
>Did you hear about the guy who feel in lava
>He was destroyed
and other baffling attempts at jokes. So I assume the pic is OC from a thread where people tried digging up info about the book and the author. I mean, the sword and pickaxe makes sense and so does the Amazon Prime logo (Because it was self-published on it I believe).
Everything else baffles me.
3e5a92 No.16723212
>>16723094
Pic related is joke book
4a57a8 No.16723827
>>16723212
Every time I see this I'm still thrown back at how little of a shit they gave when writing this. It's like some Chinese guy looked up a word bank of reactions during a vague circumstance and just went with it.