/v/ - Video Games

This one.

>>16712517

Anything that looks at least like N64 or PS1 games is should be alright, as long as it's cartoony or animelistic in style.

Higher definition textures on low poly look fine as hell for some reason. Your pic looks pretty good.

But for a pornographic game, the standards may be a bit higher, at least in the sex scenes.

Only game I can think of that does smut well with semi-low-poly models is "poke abby".

https://oxopotion.itch.io/poke-abby

But I think you can do good with lower poly counts. Hell, people fap to minecraft animated porn for fuck's sake, anything is possible if you do it well, as >>16712519 says.

I could see myself fapping to good animations in the style of your pic if the characters are cute, expressive and well animated enough.

>>16712538

>>16712517

>that pic

;_;7

>>16712658

From what?

>>16712658

I dunno but I just made this and rather than make another Low Poly thread I'll post it here.

>one game is open world

>the other one has prerendered backgrounds

both have about as many polygons.

>>16712679

I think your image is actually already the ideal, but maybe with a bit smaller head or longer limbs. Anime-like art works for this kind of stuff because it's minimalistic but highly expressive, and that's pretty ideal for erotic stuff where too much detail starts detracting from the idea. That's basically perfect for low-poly porn.

Look into spritework porn games and pay attention to the use of broad, repetitive motions and timed facial expressions to convey stress and destress of the characters' physical movements. Millia Wars comes to mind. To make this work, you basically have to block out animation with an almost Disney level of gesture and rhythm. Do that, but with 3D, and you should be golden.

>>16712796

How'd you get the silent hill playermodel?

>>16712517

Depends on how low poly you want to go, in my opinion you should not go too low.

>>16713212

What did I just watch?

>>16713397

low poly is the best shit ever

>forces you to use a good artstyle that will be timeless

>dont have to spend years on 1 model with 4 trillion polygons and make it super realistic

>is lower in filesize

>better performance overall

>easier to work with

>if you get the hang of it you can easily make loads of models in no time

There is NO downsides to using low poly models and it all really depends on what game you are making

>>16713452

>The characters will either look like chibi shit or will look like lifeless dolls

>>16713560

>I need 5000000 polygon realistic shit to enjoy art

pic related is (You)

The closest thing I can think of that's 'low poly but looks it hot' is BRS the game for PSP. I really like the lowpoly and overall art style of the game, the animations are nice too. If you want a rip, you can just go find MMD files on deviantart (for some odd reason, game ripfags love MMD), you can just convert the model into obj using English PMX; then study.

Relying solely on low poly to make porn might be difficult though, maybe place them there in the 'game' part, but when there's a sex scene switch to a 2D drawn image. But that's just my personal tastes.

>>16713452

You can make some pretty cute low poly girls.

>>16713820

Low poly queen, coming through.

>>16713844

>>16712517

I'd say the most important part of it is the style you give to the game. You don't only need good models but also a way for them to actually look good.

Your best bet is chibi, like in your pic, and there are plenty of games like it, although they are presented in pixel art, I don't see why it can't be mimicked in low-poly if done right.

If you want examples of this style I have a few

>Eroico

>Forest of Blue Slime/Sky

Also, despite the dev being a faggot, check the early builds of WIATWA3DA?, here's a link https://mega.nz/#!4M5kAKhK!3LWROBziBMZbC-L19J1nD-rjzySKq2uklflbecRsTkA

Important question is, what kind of game would you make, OP?

>>16712550

>the standards may be a bit higher, at least in the sex scenes.

This is stupid and the equivalent of being a graphic whore.

>>16712725

Reminder that female porn games are for faggots. Only a faggot would play as a girl in a porn game.

>>16713893

No it wouldn't. Nothing wrong with triangle tits, look at Lara Croft. Also, if the camera keeps far enough it shouldn't be a problem. He could make special renders for up-close shots, but models should stay low-poly.

>>16713844

>>16713850

>monica

my absolute nigga

i still remember grinding for the panther ensemble.

>>16713876

>graphic whore

When the goal is to visually tittilate the viewer, decent graphics are kinda necessary.

Eroico and FoBS are cool examples of pixelated hentai. But they aren't as simple and limited as you might think, actually quite big as long as pixelated sprites go. There's a limit to how much simplified it could get before losing a significant part of it's sexual appeal. Pic Related.

If you need a game where the whole point is to look at good looking body parts, it's better if they also look good at close range.

>>16713922

>if the camera keeps far enough it shouldn't be a problem.

that's the point, it most likely will

>He could make special renders for up-close shots, but models should stay low-poly.

now you came full circle

>>16713960

>porn text games

Their goal isn't to visually tittilate the viewer. That's like saying movies aren't better with good visuals because a book doesn't need visuals at all.

>VNs with still pics

There is some merit to ones that have good writing despite having bad art, but good art makes them immensely superior, don't pretend that's not true.

>that's proven wrong in Eroico and FoBS

It's not. They look worse the more you zoom in on them.

>small up-close slightly high-poly shot while you also watch the actual low-poly characters fuck from afar.

It would defeat the purpose of making low poly smut, only to have a better looking high-poly smut alongside it.

Just to clarify, I never meant that it couldn't be done in low poly, only that it needs proper poly counts where they are needed. That fucking Lara Croft triangle tits for example would look horrible in a porn game. She'd need at least 6th Lara's tits to start looking good in action.

>>16713876

Key word on "early builds" since he removed things from later versions despite the fucking name. Shibari outfit for your genderswap was one of them.

>>16714131

More important than good models is how well you animate them. A lot of 3D porn looks lifeless and robotic.

DON'T WATCH PORN

>>16714315

>>16713510

>>16713547

>>16713452

>>16714435

I can tolerate a bit of hamminess, at least in H anime or ASMR, but bad SFX can ruin it for sure. It's not always a deal-breaker though when you can mute it.

>>16713844

>>16713850

Xiao was cuter

>>16714701

Xiao is adorable and highly underrated.

>>16714204

>I'm beggining to think you are a retard.

Sure thing, let's disregard the fact that books are a better medium than movies and that movies CAN be better than books in ways books can't be good.

>Doesn't change the fact that better visuals also improve the presentation

Which is pointless when your presentation is low poly, retard.

>While bad visuals can sometimes ruin presentations

Only if you are a graphic whore. A good game will be good regardless of graphics, and text games are proof that you don't need visuals to make porn.

>You're constantly talking as if you should just throw the good graphics away

Yes, because, again, IT'S NOT IMPORTANT. The presentation is not only graphics, retard, you said so yourself, and even though it'd be nice to have good graphics and good everything else, this is low-poly, and I'm not saying just because it's low-poly it has to be one, but you insist in having it have a high poly count when things in OP or even Lara Croft works perfectly fine as presentation as long as you know what you are doing.

What a good example? Subverse is a cuck game made by cuck devs, and even though it kinda looks like an AAA game, it will probably be the worst porn game I've ever played.

>Not if you want to properly show people what is happenin

Again, this is not needed in neither eroico or fobs and people know exactly what is happening. Leaving to the imagination is better than pointless exposure.

>You might as well go full Sims and have super low poly model

Funny that the sims porn mods are among the most popular porn mods for games.

>But if he wants people to see the action up close, it's not gonna look good.

Then OP would be a retard and that would already ruin his game.

>instead of trying to dance around bad ones for no reason?

Because you are already limiting yourself by working with low-poly. Even if your models are great, doesn't change the fact that they are still low-poly, so it's better to resort to work arounds to keep it that way. Same with pixel art like the previously mentioned games, which I feel I'm not stressing enough.

>By your logic you could just ditch her limb joints and she would still look fine

If her joints will not display during the sex scenes, then yes. Put detail where you need it, otherwise it'd be a waste. Fuck, this is basic in animation. Having a full articulated body of someone whose face is only going to show is pretty much retarded and a waste of resources and time.

You can have perfectly well animated models even if the models are low-poly.

>if you enter a thread about game graphics and don't want to see opinions and facts about actual good graphics.

<OP asks about low-poly models

<BUT WHY CAN'T THE MODELS BE SUPER DETAILED AND HAVE MORE POLYGONS!?

All graphic whores are retarded or only you?

>>16714315

>Key word on "early builds"

Yeah, that's why I even posted the last good build and pointed it out. What a fucking shame, I fucking hate manyiakis and I hope he burns in hell.

>>16714763

What you want is adding psychics to the tits. That's retarded. If you have a good example of low-poly models with psychics be my guest, but that's out of the question.

>>16714707

>TFW no talking Steve to help me through dungeons.

>>16714859

It would be atrocious. The way the mass is supposed to distort isn't just in the nipples. It would be even more godawful if you were trying to depict titty fucking. Now imagine triangle penises.

>>16714809

>psychics to the tits

You hot for Miss Cleo or something?

>>16714809

>books are a better medium than movies

that's like, your opinion, man

Erotic Literature and Visual Erotica are two very different things. A game can have only literature, but it can have both, if it has both it's better if both are good.

>pointless when your presentation is low poly

Are you implying that low poly can't look good and/or it shouldn't strive to look good just because it's low poly?

>IT'S NOT IMPORTANT

Just because it's not as important as gameplay or writing, doesn't mean it's not important at all, you idiot. That's a pitfall people fall into when first learning about the "graphic whore" boogeyman. It's a falacy: "game with good graphics can be bad, so good graphics are bad"

>people know exactly what is happening. Leaving to the imagination is better than pointless exposure

Let's not even make the game then, retard, just imagine the game and you're done. I get what you mean, but exposure isn't pointless at all when you have images to be exposed. Good imagery is to visual erotica what good writing is to erotic literature.

>sims porn mods are among the most popular porn mods for games.

Precisely because they add actual animations that you can see instead of censored blurs that "leave everything to imagination", you mongoloid.

>If her joints will not display during the sex scenes

>Put detail where you need it, otherwise it'd be a waste. Fuck, this is basic in animation.

This contradics your own arguments for triangle tits to be acceptable. Guess what is not only going to be in full display and also the center of attention in a porn game? Ass and titties.

>You can have perfectly well animated models even if the models are low-poly.

I never stated the contrary, it's just that some levels of low poly might be too basic for enjoyable visual erotica. Triangle tits over there would not fly, for example. Fifth Lara looks much better, and is still looks low poly.

>WHY CAN'T THE MODELS BE SUPER DETAILED AND HAVE MORE POLYGONS

That's you projecting. Low Poly doesn't mean it has to look bad. You just need the proper techniques and the right "poly investment" where it's needed to make it as appealing as possible while still maintaing the low poly look and feel. A game that has it's focus on body movement and shape, of course is gonna need a higher poly count on the character models than something like a platformer where the focus is locomotion and positioning in a 3D space, the goal is to only increase it as necessesary to look good while still maintaining a relative low poly count.

>>16714892

>You can have them jiggle without having it overly complicated.

Of course you can, but it would undeniably look worse, and there would be no reason to do that when you can have them better looking while still being low poly.

>Titty fucking Out of the question and a shitty fetish.

Kinda unrelated but pretty funny when you were praising "x-ray windows"

Also, learn something:

Graphic Whoring is discrediting a game as a whole JUST because it has bad graphics. Preferring good graphics in a game or criticising poor graphics or art direction in an otherwise good game is just good taste.

And remember: Low-Poly doesn't automatically mean bad graphics, and vice versa. You can have good looking low-poly, as long as you don't pretend triangle tits would look good in a porn game.

And pretending good looking, well made visuals doesn't make anything with visuals better is called "Denial".

>>>/v/16714960

Good grief.

>>16714956

>tit texture partly on the arms.

I'll commend the creativity but it's still the 3D equivalent of pixelshit just like Minecraft is by default.

>>16714956

>Muh subjectivity

>but it can have both, if it has both it's better if both are good.

Shitty flawed argument. A game can focus on either but it'd be objectively a worst game if the only thing it has is good visuals, and that applies to porn games as well. If all you want is things to look great watch a video, faggot.

>Are you implying that low poly can't look good and/or it shouldn't strive to look good just because it's low poly?

No, I'm saying that instead of trying to polish a turd you should try to focus in anything other than the turd. As I said, Lara Croft old models would work perfectly for porn because they do look good.

>game with good graphics can be bad, so good graphics are bad

It's extremely hard to aim for good graphics, specially when you are aiming for low-poly on the level of the PS1, so aiming for graphics is retarded and why most games fail. It's a money/effort/time sink with little to no pay off.

>but exposure isn't pointless at all when you have images to be exposed

But OP doesn't and it sounds like he doesn't want to put more effort than needed in graphics. Also, even if you have something good to show over exposure still is not important. Again, Eroico and FOBS looks pretty as hell without having you to zoom in.

>Precisely because they add actual animations that you can see instead of censored blurs that "leave everything to imagination"

While still keeping the low polys, faggot, with no extra detail added except a crude low-poly penis and vagina. As long as the animation is good enough you can not only get off but it'd be way better. And you know what actually makes the difference? Not the poly-count but textures. Again, this is basic.

>This contradics your own arguments for triangle tits to be acceptable

What? How? I never said anything about not showing the tits, low-poly or not.

>Triangle tits over there would not fly, for example. Fifth Lara looks much better, and is still looks low poly.

So you have shit taste and you don't know how low-poly works. Cool. Fifth Lara is not PS1 Lara, not to say only because she is not PS1 is not low poly, but as shown here >>16713557 this is what you can do in low-poly and IT IS appealing, and PS1 lara is.

>while still maintaing the low poly look and feel

Again, flawed. You either stick to low-poly or don't. You are basically trying to force nostalgia by having it looking like it without being it. "Poly investment" my ass, just add a vagina to low-poly roll from megaman legends and you'd have great porn as long as the vagina texture is good and the penis clips through it.

>A game that has it's focus on body movement and shape, of course is gonna need a higher poly count on the character models

Not true, as pointed out by Megaman Legends and, again, Tomb Raider.

>Preferring good graphics in a game or criticising poor graphics or art direction in an otherwise good game is just good taste.

No, it's graphic whoring by the simple fact that graphics are not and will never be important, and largely for the fact that focusing on this kind of thinking is one of the things that incremented the industry money sink. If it wasn't true, pixel graphics or 5th gen graphics wouldn't still be hold high today, and why OP asked for low-poly in the first place.

>Low-Poly doesn't automatically mean bad graphics

Never said the contrary, but all you want is the poly-count to increase, faggot.

Here is what I think and where your mentality is flawed. You think that since it will be 3D you should be able to zoom in and look around the scene, when I've already said a fixed perspective would fix any problem low-poly would have while also optimizing resources and time by not putting details where you have to. Again, and again, and again, I've used Eroico and FOBS as an example because they do have fixed angles, you can only watch a sex scene as an specific angle, so think about 2D drawing but reflected in 3D. Why would an artist draw something where you can't see it in a 2D plane?

This isn't even new, games like Arc Sys games, which makes fantastic 3D games that looks like 2D, use this kind of techniques in order to make 3D look as good as 2D.

>>16714996

Dude I'm not even gonna point all the nonsense and contradictions there because the "wall of text" will keep increasing and you'll still cycle through the same loops.

The appeal of real time rendered 3D graphics is precisely that of the ability of seeing them from many angles and distances.

Eroico and FoBS have fixed angles because you can't physically have other angles without redrawing the sprites. That concept does not translate in real time rendered 3D environments, where not only the camera can change, but also the models facing direction in relation to the camera.

IF the dev chooses to not have dinamic camera AND have the characters always posed in the same directions, just for them not to be viewed from other angles, then he's a bigger retard than you. He'd be gimping his own project out of a key feature of real time 3D rendering just because of lazyness and muh PS1 examples even though none of them focused on sex.

Here's a gift for you, some N64 models that are N64 levels of low poly, but have better looking asses and titties than your examples, because the devs actually focused on them with their resources. You can stop pretending that to have better low poly graphics you need big increases in poly count.

Also, stop embarrassing yourself, the what looks great about Arc System's Cell shaded 3D graphics is precisely that you get sprite like quality but in dynamic environments with multiple camera angles.

>>16715008

He has no real argument and can't reply to you if you don't type anything for him to disagree on. He's ready to die on the crux that "writing is the most important thing in games, graphics are not needed at all" When games like tetris exist purely on gameplay, advance almost only on the graphics department, and has absolutely zero writing.

>>16715077

By now you're right, I won't reply anymore, the dude's gone full retard now repeating the same shit and anyone can see it. I just wanted to make that clear.

>>16715105

>The appeal of real time rendered 3D graphics is precisely that of the ability of seeing them from many angles and distances.

Not it isn't, or at least it doesn't have to be, specially if you plan to work on low-poly chibi models. Animation techniques exists for a reason. What you want is an overglorified 3D gallery like Illusion games but somehow low-poly. It's retarded.

>He'd be gimping his own project out of a key feature of real time 3D rendering just because of lazyness and muh PS1 examples even though none of them focused on sex

>It's a key feature because I have shit taste and because I say so

Work with what you have, if you want dynamic cameras then don't use low-poly models at all otherwise you'd have a shit mediocre game and it'd show because you can zoom in.

>You can stop pretending that to have better low poly graphics you need big increases in poly count.

Cool, there's barely no difference between Lara and those models in the first place, or are you going to pretend those are not triangle tits? If this is what you are ok with, then ok. Now stop insisting on adding more polygons to low-poly like a retard.

>that you get sprite like quality but in dynamic environments with multiple camera angles.

And you are completely fucking wrong, they are fighting game because the camera is fixed in a single angle and their movement is actually frame by frame, faggot. Want more examples? The Jojo Bizarre Adventure games actually warp the models and hide the warped parts in order to achieve the ridiculous Jojo poses that wouldn't normally be possible. Again, this is a technique done in order for 3D to look as good as 2D. So let's go to your retarded statement of

>IF the dev chooses to not have dinamic camera AND have the characters always posed in the same directions

This is normally done, by Arc Sys and plenty of other 3D artists and animators in order to deliver a good presentation. Having dynamic cameras in something like this is beyond retarded, because last time I checked, you don't have dynamic cameras in the middle of a fight in arc sys or jojo.

You are nothing but a graphic whore with no idea of how good animation work, let alone in low-poly.

>writing is the most important thing in games, graphics are not needed at all

Prove me wrong, because as I said, porn text games exist, proving that graphics are not important, not even in a porn game.

>When games like tetris exist purely on gameplay, advance almost only on the graphics department, and has absolutely zero writing.

Show me a single good porn game with zero writing.

>>16715335

>the porn that is completely present

so it has visual nudity? and the visual nudity is just as visually nude as the text? weird text based game…

>>16715335

>What does that have to do with the fact that Eroico is a proper game instead of "just porn"?

nobody made this argument, dipshit.

the argument was that the porn parts are more graphically/animatedly detailed because the visuals are the purpose of the porn parts of the games.

same applies in 3D.

you can clearly tell when this gif goes from being a game, to being porn. and guess what happens to the character sprites? tons more details. and if that translated to a 3D, there would be a higher poly count.

>>16715351

Yeah, I don't like them, but they are clearly doing something right to have so many autists behind them, plus proving the fact that you don't need visuals to sell a porn game.

Also, thanks, Rance is a good example too, but still.

>>16715365

>so it has visual nudity?

Yeah, it is described to you through so you can imagine it, that's why it's a porn game, no different from a visual novel with still pics.

>nobody made this argument, dipshit.

See >>16715231

>nigger, its a porn game. nobody plays them for the gameplay.

But sure, keep pretending to be retarded.

>>16715365

>the argument was that the porn parts are more graphically/animatedly detailed because the visuals are the purpose of the porn parts of the games

You are separating the porn from the gameplay which is retarded. Even though you can get porn by losing, you also get it by being good at it and beating the enemies, so the game clearly rewards you with it by actually playing it instead of losing on purpose, which actually makes it a proper PORN game.

>and guess what happens to the character sprites? tons more details.

Get your eyes checked. The sprite quality is the same through all that gif, onlt difference being nudity. The change is not jarring or even noticeable other than the fact that they enter a porn animation.

>and if that translated to a 3D, there would be a higher poly count.

Then it would defeat the point of low-poly, retard, then just do a high poly game through and through and stop being a faggot. In Eroico they keep the same chibi aspect, with little to no change in the sprite. Same with FoBS.

>>16715412

>>16715463

>so its implied, and doesnt actually have any.

Of course it does, retard, just because your brain doesn't have the capacity to imagine it, doesn't mean it doesn't.

>i was referring to the porn parts of the porn game

Great backpedaling. The subject of conversation is porn games, and guess what does a porn game have, porn and gameplay. You literally said that nobody plays porn games for the gameplay, and if that's true, why don't you go and watch videos like a normalfag?

>so the 2 things are seperate? if it wasnt, how else could you be rewarded with "it"?

So you are telling me that the point of Super Mario 64 is not an star because the game rewards you with stars? Stars are completely indifferent to the gameplay? Are you retarded?

>the animation quality clearly changes, liar.

No it doesn't. Check your eyes. I can keep posting more and more examples, not even in Kurovadis, from the same dev of eroico, does. And if you think a change of perspective in the sprites is somehow an upgrade, I can laugh harder.

The only thing that kinda change is the amount of frames, which you know what improves? Animation.

>>16715574

>YES! as long as you imagine it!

It is described to you via text. Are you telling me text is not something visual? Do you think it's in braille? And even then. You wanted to argue semantics, well, come on, let's argue semantics.

>you just seperated them.

Then how should I call it, pornplay, retard?

>Muh sex parts

You are the only one separating the porn from the gameplay when a good porn game gives you the porn as a reward, which is achieved via gameplay.

>mario 64 rewards you with more levels, more GAME. not more stars, dipshit.

<There can't be more than one reward

<More levels doesn't mean more starts

<More game in a porn game can't mean more porn and gameplay

HAHAHAHAHA!

Are all graphic whores as retarded as you are?

>your examples show the porn parts having exceedingly more detail than normal gameplay

No it doesn't. Show me how it is more detailed when the character sprite is literally the same. Anyone with eyes can see that.

>and if it was translated to low-poly the porn scenes would require more poly and a greater focus on animation

Except the games I posted doesn't have any kind of improvement in the sprites when the sex starts and it keeps the gameplay aspect by not even interrupting it.

What you basically want is the game to be interrupted by a transition to higher poly instead of keeping it at low poly, which defeats the point of having a low-poly porn game. It's retarded, either just make a high-poly game in the first place or stick to low-poly.

>>16715599

More like, ITT: OP makes two legitimate looking posts, then proceeds to change his IP to roleplay as a retard that disagrees with anyone that replies.

>>16715608

>no, its not.

Listen, anon, normal people have enough brain capacity to use imagination.

>do you know the difference between a novel and a visual novel?

Do you know the difference between a book and a picture book?

>because the 2 are seperate, retard.

No, they are not.

>rewarding with porn is like rewarding with a cutscene

Reminder that when you finish Mario 64, guess what your reward is, retard. What the reward is is irrelevant, the point is using gameplay in order to get to that reward.

>the animation quality changes

There you go again, moving goal posts.

>>16715623

>Porn in the majority of porn games being far removed from the gameplay is a valid argument

>You play the game, win or lose, and then the game switches into "porn mode" where you view a gallery or sprite animation and are no longer playing the game

That sounds like a shit game.

>Shit, this even happens in eroico.

In Eroico you need to defeat the enemies and clear the level in order to unlock the gallery. So basically, if you actually want to unlock all the porn, you purposely have to avoid losing, even if losing also has porn.

>but the vast majority of them don't.

And that could change, fuck, that needs to change, but instead you want to do the same the rest is doing.

>>16715931

Sure. Can I see some of yours as well?

>>16713385

What's the matter, Anon? Not hungry?

Finish your dinner, or no dessert!

>>16715685

What anon is saying, in reference to the "porn parts", is that the porn in Eroico is wholly disconnected from the gameplay because it has no gameplay elements to it. The game elements of Eroico are the platforming and the combat. The instant you get knocked down and mounted, it switches to "porn mode", where you have no control and a pre-made animation loops endlessly until stopped. His statement, therefore, is that a good porn game mixes the porn and gameplay, giving you some level of control over the pornography or otherwise integrating it into the gameplay. And as a result, you are a dumb nigger because you misinterpreted this, and gave an example of the described issue (gameplay-porn break) by describing galleries (a severe extreme of the problem, as they are a collection of ordinary pornography wholly unrelated to the game itself and bearing little connection to the gameplay) while believing that it was a statement that would refute the point made.

TLDR porn games are bad when their porn has absolutely no integration into the gameplay, i.e. when it takes the form of a medium that could be put on gelbooru with no loss of information or control. A gallery or looped isolated animations do not make a porn game, it makes a game with porn in a second window. You might as well play Final Fantasy 7 with Gelbooru opened in another tab with the tags "tifa" and "rating:explicit".

>>16716573

Well sure, pic related is from a v1.00 in 2016. I've seen posts of them making new animations and content, such as the gifs in >>16716568

>>16716006

looks like shit

>>16715685

why did you bother typing all of that nonsense?

you have poor reading comprehension.

example:

>graphics = animation

when i said

>more graphically/animatedly detailed

see?

youre a nigger.

>>16716787

yes.

although i wasnt even making that point yet because the anon you replied to couldnt even comprehend the basics of the subject due to autism.

the only point i was attempting to communicate was that the appeal of a "porn part" in a porn game is based on its aesthetics, so graphics/looks matter in those porn parts.

the anon you replied to was arguing that aesthetics/graphics/animation quality does not matter when it comes to animated/vidya porn and improving said aesthetics/graphics/animation would not improve the quality of the "porn"

he bases that argument on the fact that text porn games exist.

>>16715687

I wanna know what you're gonna do with it.

>>16717759

I'll now accept your unconditional surrender.

>>16719005

Something in godot, maybe If i can get the sound effects and levels.

Was thinking of doing something similar for RE1 but the second floor of the mansion corrupted or something and it sorta isnt there anymore? So I stopped working on it

>>16720740

Oh god, be careful what you wish for.

>>16716799

Kind of tempted to just buy a copy. Camel has been a fairly steady source for fap material for damned neared 20 years, and unlike Despair Game - Echidna Wars is actually a fairly decent game in it's own right.

I'll share if I do

Sachiho best girl

>>16712550

So from what the comments are telling me on the site is that the developer stopped making this after he was pussy whipped by his GF.

Honestly the faces are kind of unattractive but at the same time fresh compared to most of the stuff i jack off to, so props to the unique artstyle?

>>16716568

Well that's not what I was expecting to happen.

>>16723676

Why do people always want to kill people with fetishes they don't like?

>>16712517