/v/ - Video Games

>>16238221

is the story any good?

>>16238227

No idea. Apparently you don't have quests markers in the game and have to figure everything out yourself.

>the Dark Souls of indie games

>open-world

>survival

>$40

<split-screen is nice though

>>16238247

They also already said they're planning paid DLC.

>>16238247

Literally nothing wrong with any of those.

>>16238253

>open-world

<big empty spaces and copy pasted enemies

>survival

<spend less time actually fighting and more time looking for resourcces

>$40

<I could buy four steaks with that, never pay $20 + inflation for a computer game

>>16238221

All of these sound terrible, and for $40 nonetheless.

>>16238221

>Dark Souls type combat

>Not in an environment structured around it for ganking, pitfalls and the like

I don't see this working. Besides, you could arguably do this if you just dumped 50 + players into the dark souls map and have a better experience.

When's Souls Royale coming out?

>>16238273

I'm not even sure there's a PvP aspect in the game which kinda sounds dumb. I could be wrong though.

>>16238262

>non-open-world

<long linear corridors with copy pasted enemies

>spend less time actually fighting and more time looking for resourcces

Play a fighting game if that's the only valid thing you think a game can have nigger.

><I could buy four steaks with that, never pay $20 + inflation for a computer game

Retarded mindset, if another game is 4 times bigger and more complex than your $20 game, then it's completely reasonable to price it higher. If you think no game should ever be more than $20 then developers would just cut all games into "episodes" that have the minimum $20 game's worth of content.

>>16238221

>Dark Souls

Stopped reading there. Go back to reddit with your crappy third person brawlers.

>>16238313

honestly 20 dollars for a good game seems rather reasonable to me if you take out all the MILLIONS of dollars spent on stupid shit like celebrities, motion tracking, denuvo, 80% budget marketing, "diversity officers" (or whatever the fuck they're called), and making "super good graphex" for a 900 year old engine, etc.

All they have to do is just like, take a studio and try NOT to suck dicks for once. Granted that obviously this is extremely difficult for them.

>>16238221

>survival

why the fuck, this isn't fallout

>>16238834

>PvP Ruined Dark Souls

Get a load of this faggot.

>>16238221

>>16238839

PvP absolutely killed weapons and spells viability. Which would be fine if they separated PvP and PvE from each other, but they didn't.

>>16238313

>Retarded mindset, if another game is 4 times bigger and more complex than your $20 game, then it's completely reasonable to price it higher. If you think no game should ever be more than $20 then developers would just cut all games into "episodes" that have the minimum $20 game's worth of content.

How about four times more fun? Even considering legal copies, two of my favorite games ever go for five bucks now on their respective kike stores, and the third is abandonware. The new game I've had the most fun with in the past few years has been free, too. Going down the list of games I like, they all go for five to ten bucks nowadays, the most expensive being $20.

Games are meant to be fun, and should be measured by fun. If it's not more fun than some of my all time favorites, it's not worth $20, let alone more.

How many people can play in the coop? I have a group of two friends, plus me and we've been looking for a game that we can play together, to fill a void and just have something fun to do together.

If I can form a party with them, I'll probably get it for all three of us, just so we can all feel like we're adventuring together.

>>16238839

>play anything but the best weapon/armor/stat build

>need to make x4 the effort to kick someones ass

DS PvP is chink mmo tier that makes some builds absolutely curbstomping in comparison to other non-meta builds, can you still fight and win? yeah sure, but you will need to make way too much effort in comparison to using the cookiecutter builds

>>16238221

Bit sad that the thread is anchored, but I guess OP didn't made much of an effort.

I suppose this is a niche game since there's actually not many "open world" fans out there. Linear corridors with cinematic fights are more of their thing.

Also the survival aspects, that's quite a niche field since it's hard to explain the purpose of that (and as a consequence, not many devs know how to implement that)

The game looks a bit generic, but I kinda got a vibe of Caves of Qud in 3D, so I'll probably give it a pirate at least.

Looks somewhat interesting. I'll give it a pirate if they make a steamworks fix.

>>16239067

So do the mods on this /v/ hate video games or something? I keep seeing threads that don't have anything wrong with them getting anchored

>>16239067

>>16240096

Believe it or not, advertising isn't allowed here.

>>16240096

There's nothing to talk about because it isn't out, and the OP is basically just shilling. I want it because I'm desperate for something to co-op with a friend and it looks rad, but the OP is a faggot.

>>16240620

Nigger I'm not the game dev if you want to know more about the game look it up yourself. It's hardly ever mentioned here and you'd expect a game like this to be discussed here.