>>16207274
Nice assumption, fag. I'm not doxing myself over this.
>>16207277
Here's the thing: in the past there really wasn't a separation between art and fanart, and artists still made money from their work without copyright. William Shakespeare (you can substitute him for almost any successful author before the 18th century) profited from his plays, painters, sculptors, and engravers were inspired by his work and sold what we now call fanart, and so on. Meanwhile musicfags have always made more money from live performances than anything else: unless you're either fucking huge or print out your albums yourself the percentage you get is fucking pitiful
Copyright's original motives were very questionable it was mostly there to pacify publishers who wanted the return of a britbong "oi, you gotta have a loicense to print that" censorship tool they abused for shekels, but the founding fathers hesitantly tolerated it because they figured it could give authors a brief, limited monopoly as encouragement to make more stuff without giving them a neverending license to withhold their shit from the public domain. Thanks to publishers demanding artists' copyrights as part of the contract and neverending copyright extensions, in practice copyright has become the very opposite of the founding fathers' goals. It now discourages original works (which publisher Jews see as risky), encourages hoarding copyrights and strategically milking them over several decades, and either keeps fanartists from getting gud or encourages them to make bland knockoffs for legal reasons.
Intellectual property, on the other hand, flat out doesn't exist from a philosophical or legal perspective. It's an actual forced meme pushed by Jews to confuse normalfags so they can get away with retarded shit like saying repairing your phone is trespassing or that (((IPs))) should be passed down through generations like a house.
>You are trying to argue that IPs are not "physical property" when physical property and initial investment were required to get the IP out into public domain to begin with.
By this reasoning, a chair is a meal because the carpenter digested food while working on it.
Marxists also believe an object's value comes from the resources and effort put into it even though it's very easy to transform raw materials and effort into objects of less value than either.