>>15634976
Example of where apparently the sequel just not having blood and gore warranted a lower rating than its M-tier predecessors, despite some of the other stuff present. I know the ESRB is apparently more lax than one might be led to believe by various companies, and certainly more-so than some other countries' ratings boards (Australia, Germany, UK), but I'm still surprised this got away with a T, and makes me wonder just how much content Midway sent in. For the record, in PAL it was PEGI 16+, and in Japan CERO 15+.
>>15635250
>>15635254
>Ar Nosurge posted.
>Absolute venom in response
I get the feeling you two are well acquainted, considering how often I've seen this occur.