>>15600915
Have you never fucking made a webm before?
Sure you'll need a fuckton of webms if you want a 4k 60fps movie, but OP's video clearly isn't that.
In fact, if you download the mp4 straight form the invidious links it's around 35 MB, you can cut that size down significantly with VP9 and orbus, plus you can slightly reduce video bitrate, audio bitrate, size or framerate if needed.
>>15600931
Pic related. The thumbnails are straight from youtube's image server (YTimg), the same one from youtube's own site, in case you have any doubt based on name alone.
This means that your computer sends a request straight to youtube which can connect your IP to this site.
The videos themselves can also be traced back to you as shown by the retard below.
>>15600973
Did you even read what you just fucking posted?
>Invidious itself does not pass through any information that I know of
>Invidious does *not* proxy the video files
>I don't make that the claim of anonymity […] because it would rely on some information that I don't know
>My main concern is that I don't know to what extet Google/Youtube tracks access to the raw video files
TL;DR he thinks it's safe but admits he doesn't know for sure, and even admits the videos themselves are straight from youtube.
What does that get you? Fucking nothing.
Either post a webm or GTFO.