>>15180888
If it mostly based on graphics like you say why would i for example compare 2003 textures and lightning to a modern game and pretend they are on par? To define graphics on their ability to "hold well" is very ambiguous, as for me Super Mario 64 graphics hold well enough to any modern bing bing wahoo game.
many games nowadays have more gameplay features and elements than a 2003 game or their iteration of said gen, and also there is not only quality of graphics but of sound, and we also strive for better quality of the voice acting too as in the PS2 for example most games would get away with some shitty inexpressive lines, not to mention lower framerates and worse connection methods.