/v/ - Video Games

>>15172618

I think you misunderstood something.

Its square enix. They can go fuck themselves at any time.

>>15172629

Just buy it used like I did.

Or pirate it on PC.

>>15172618

I like it a ton despite shooting being a bit weak and driving being shit. Then again I'm playing it with 60FPS, so my experience is rather stable. Also I really hope there's more side content with Just Cause 4, one of the major issues with Just Cause 3 is that it has literally no side content.

I didn't even know there was a just cause 3 til just now. Just cause 1 was such a mediocre average game, I'm surprised they even made a sequel to it. Let alone a sequel to a sequel.

>>15172629

You mean Edios, right? Western Square Enix is just Edios with a different name.

>>15172618

Same OP from the batman thread or just a shitposter?

>>15172651

Only made the thread and a post. He's a newfag, but honestly I DO wanna talk about Just Cause.

>>15172648

2 improved massively on 1 and 3 improved massively on 2. You should give 3 a go.

>>15172660

I wouldn't say 3 improved massively on 2, however the gliding suit is a welcome feature.

>>15172657

Alright, I enjoyed 2's multiplayer but I really didn't like anything else. Is it still alive?

>>15172651

Neither fuckhead, I'm looking for actual discussion about the game. The board could do with less whiny little shits getting triggered every time a certain company or series is mentioned.

It's repetitive as fuck and all the new fancy tricks you can do overstay their welcome and become a chore after the 213534134th copypasted town you liberate.

The writing lost the cheesy campiness from JC2 and turned into some tryhard MUH LIBERATORS rubbish which clashes awfully with everything else.

No multiplayer despite the resounding success of the MP mod for JC2, a fact the devs were fully aware of.

It has Denuvo.

>>15172666

Dunno, haven't played 2's multiplayer since they got rid of the 600 player cap.

>>15172665

3 has a lot of small features added which I like.

It's the only game I can think of where if you shoot a rocket into the air it doesn't just explode into nothing, it follows a ballistic arc and comes back down to the ground. All the structural physics shit is cool too, it dynamically falls apart like you'd expect a real thing to fall apart. I miss certain things from 2 though, like being able to just press a button to go from parachuting into climbing on a car. In 3 you have to grapple onto them.

>>15172671

Yeah the town liberating thing was a dumb way to extend gameplay rather than just making side missions. I think the issue is that they're trying to make Rico some kind of rebel hero rather than a sociopath who just wants to break shit and watch it go boom, because of this gameplay is limited by the narrative. I'm hoping they make a spin off where you're just some deep state agent who is hired to fuck up a commie country, this way you have more leeway with what you want to do. Like you can pretend to be part of the police and fuck people up, become part of an underground fight club, and do other kinds of undercover jobs in order to "fit in". I'd call it Unjust Cause, but I doubt we'll get a game like that.

>>15172681

No, you're being unfair to the game. How about you ignore journalism e-drama for 5 minutes and judge a game on how it plays?

>>15172671

>It's repetitive as fuck

If you're an imaginationless pleb who just does missions and can't make your own fun, the game gives you so many tools and toys to play with.

>and all the new fancy tricks you can do overstay their welcome and become a chore after the 213534134th copypasted town you liberate.

No one forces you to even do the missions, 30 minutes in you're free to fuck around to your hearts content

>The writing lost the cheesy campiness from JC2 and turned into some tryhard MUH LIBERATORS rubbish which clashes awfully with everything else.

True

>No multiplayer despite the resounding success of the MP mod for JC2, a fact the devs were fully aware of.

I never cared for JC2 multiplayer, I didn't see what was so fun about it.

>It has Denuvo.

PC master race (this is why you should have a PS4 as a backup for when PC gets shit ports)

>>15172687

Agreed, I'm just hoping they make significant improvements to 4 like with better side content, better shooting and driving, more diverse landscapes, a multiplayer mode, etc.

>>15172618

They tacked on Denuvo and had an absolutely garbage launch and didn't bother fixing the memory leaks or whatever the fuck was causing the horrible performance until much later.

That's enough to shit on it.

>>15172671

>The writing lost the cheesy campiness from JC2 and turned into some tryhard MUH LIBERATORS rubbish which clashes awfully with everything else.

The fuck? I've thought that JC2 already was edgier version of 1.

>>15172668

Good start, inviting shitposters by posting in the exact same manner as the Arkham Knight thread. Just make a JC general instead of this cuckchan tier "DURR I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE HATE FOR ___"

>>15172673

Still alive it seems. I might play it later

It had a nice setting but it got repetitive really quickly.

>>15172710

Can we not have a general for every game?

>>15172710

Really? Huh, what about 3's multiplayer?

>>15172728

>Can we not have a general for every game?

Generals are much better than straight up inviting shitposters, but yeah /v/ is filled with them.

I played JC3 on my friend's PS4 and didn't really like it, never tried the MP.

It was ok, an upgrade in every way from JC2, IF you use cheats to unlock all the upgrades, if not then it's shit because fuck grinding skill points with repetative challanges

>>15172660

>3 improved massively on 2

the only thing 3 "improved" on is the amount of DLC

Something about the world of JC3 and the unlimited bombs is what makes it inferior compared to JC2. I guess its how overpowered you become? Especially after the sky dlc

Unless you have top of the line graphics cards it runs like ass

This game is great, only when played on a PC.

>>15172978

I'm playing it on PS4 and it's pretty good aside from 30fps

>>15172640

>Pirate it on PC

It did it and it worked the first time i played it for 3 hours, decent fun, nothing groundbreaking and reminded me of Far Cry or Assassin's Creed but with spics and skyhooks.

Second time it wouldn't start. There's still some weird memory-leakage.

It was shit. Nothing but repetitive garbage.

The writing is complete ass and you need to skip every cutscene to avoid cringing. Completing challenges to upgrade yourself is a chore. Cars blow up a bit too easily. I couldn't bring myself to finishing it. It's okay and I kind of enjoyed the gunplay and some vehicle mechanics.

>>15172618

It's literally Just Cause 2.5

>ctrl+f map

>0 results

I think map's honestly what killed JC3 for me.

JC2 had a very diverse map, with lush, green jungles, brown deserts and snowy mountains. Sure, it's not realistic, but it's fun.

JC3 is all-mediterranean, meaning some farmfields, samey, generic forests and mountains that don't really stand out. Also, they added caverns which for me were pain in the arse since they're not as easy to get in and out of as other bases.

Also, I'm not a fan of the wingsuit for the simple reason that it made other forms of travel obsolete. JC2 had a perfect balance, imo. You had your grapple and could parachute infinitely, but it was relatively slow. Getting a car or a plane could get you across the map much faster and result in fun chases along the way. In JC3 there's no reason to ever use cars and very little reason to use planes, despite the fact that the vehicle-surfing mechanic was expanded upon and improved.

I'm kinda hoping they nerf the wingsuit in JC4, or come up with something to make cars useful again. The setting makes me hopeful they make the map interesting again though.