>>15130608
That second video is so fucking stupid. If the idea was to make the previous game look better in comparison, it's doing such a bad comparison it looks more like propaganda. It's reaching so hard for anything to use as an argument that even ebin requiem for a dream is tossed in there.
I get it that UT3 isn't popular for good reasons, but none of them are shown in that segment of the video. All that's shown is some nigger being really, really terrible at videogames and it even looks like it's on purpose, so it's even worse.
Why would you spam the translocator like that? You know very well you get much more mileage from tossing it at a much higher angle and letting it go, you're running out of charges (and complaining about it) because you're being intentionnaly dumb, not because the game is bad. I see you didn't spammed the translocator in the first game, BTW.
Besides, if the point is to showcase the differences, why are 2 very different situations being shown? The first one is mostly the combat between both players, where each already has a flag capped and they need to frag each other to score, while the second video starts with someone taking the flag and the other guy merely chases him.
And fails horribly, somehow. How bad can you possibly be that, as a defender, you have problems catching up to the flag carrier using the translocator and the massively open grounds fit for gaining track with it?
I'm sure that there's been a lot of changes in the basic gameplay and how the weapons work, not simply with the shields and the powerups. And this could have been a video about those changes, objectively proving a point.
But instead it looks like something 12 years old would come up with as an argument for why boys are better than girlz or something equally puerile.
Was it really that hard to come up with valid arguments against a bad game and put them in video?