/v/ - Video Games

Watch out for GamerGate

The public enemy of the world #1

It is the main hashtag responsible for…

☑ CONFIRMED WORLD LEADERS

☑ Making an ugly ass sweater

☑ Made Logan Paul level up

☑ Gave the Alt-Right an Asian fetish

☑ A precursor to the Alt-Right movement

☑ Trained a sealion to attack hipsters in San Francisco

☑ Defeated magical pedos in card games

☑ Helped a Korean improve his English Grammar

☑ Made Cathy Newman lose the lobster debate against Jordon Peterson

✓ Destroyed 4chan image posting

☑ May have exercised[sic] the evil from NeoGaf

☑ Bought Mombot™ merch

☑ Was caught with weapons of mass destruction by Batwu but framed a GamerGazi mod for the crime

☑ Evolving across industries

☑ Saying that dyed hair is criminal

☑ Played To Catch a Predator with GGrevolt

☑ "ethics in gamming journalism."

☑ Review bombed Black Panther on Rotten Tomatoes to break it's perfect 100% score

☑ Kingdom Come shows #Gamergate has won in every sense of the word

☑ Used the GamerGate Time Machine to inspire a play about trolls, bots, and hactivists

☑ Dis-invited Anita from Trump's meetings with game industry executives

☑ Causing a 50% decline in viewership for the Oscars in 4 years

☑ Helped contribute to the rise of the alt-right

☑ Made ALL videogames inspire Alt-Right ideology

☑ Turned Reanon into gamergate's grim harvester of souls

☑ Death by Easy Cheese™

☑ Ordered anon to fuck the feminism out of his female friend

☑ Created life

☑ Making a hashtag more important that women's lives

☑ Amplifying things through their VENDETTA ENGINE

☑ Oddly weaponized Ready Play One in the GamerGate Age

☑ Asked one of Dr Wily's Robot Masters to PROM

☑ Winning along with the rest of the twitter nazis

☑ Created /leftypol/

☑ Bullying the bully hunters

☑ Increased the bumlock

☑ Nuclear Extortion

☑ Got Larry Bundy Jr laid

☑ Discovering the secret danger of NO FAP via Chris Chan

☑ Turned the U.S. into a troll nation

☑ Kanye going Gamergate

☑ Kanye making a #GG reference in his next song will break the last seal holding back the Apocalypse

☑ Showed racist disgust at ancient Chinese traditions

☑ Indirectly ending the Korean War and Creating World Peace

☑ Caused two mass murders and the Incel Van of Peace

☑ Continues to purify "Weapon's Grade Misogyny"

thread theme btw

>>14735219

can i snaf her bunskisf?

Any developments on crunchyroll and the danmemo mobile game or the bullyhunter fiasco? I avoid all social media so twitterfags here need to keep us up to date.

>>14735247

>crunchyroll and the danmemo mobile game

Crunchyroll's still insisting that "it's not censorship when we do it" and trying to peddle the lie that you can't report their asses to the FTC if you live outside the states.

>the bullyhunter fiasco

Guerilla marketing company behind it owned up to it after home office got involved, Steelseries is thinking of suing, ZombiUnicorn is thinking of counter-suing.

>>14735229

Asians are overrepresented in schools and discriminated against by affirmative action, aren't they?

>>14735270

>saved as jpg

Fugg.

If any of the last four gets too fucked because of XOR I'll just reupload the original.

>>14735270

Anon, read the names. There are more than two people.

>>14735255

Thanks anon. It got me curious is the game even good? Have any mobilefags here tried it? It'll be hilarious if crunchyroll got their shit pushed in over a shitty game that otherwise would have had a small reception had they not thrown it and themselves into the spotlight.

Did the pyschologist/mental health person/social scientist/whatever that started a dispute with zombiunicorn before the stream pitch in after the whole travesty and dust setted down. I would love some salt from that it she did.

>>14735245

Raping a child is a crime. People can see it, report it, and tell the world about it. We all know it’s bad. But if the victim disappears or won't talk, it never happened and the monster that did it is ‘innocent’.

>>14735267

Yeah. I remember seeing someone in a GG thread post about how certain universities are starting to manipulate applicant's SAT scores based on race. A white person's application is considered as if he had scored 200 points lower on his SAT (in other words, if a white guy got a 1400 on the SAT, the university would consider it a 1200). I think it was 100 points lower for Asians. Hispanics got something like +50, and blacks got +200.

>>14735286

They've been doing that for a while now haven't they?

>>14735286

But in the UK blacks score better than whites on standardized tests.

>>14735290

Hahahaha, no, sample is too small and obviously acedemia SJWs would promote that nonsense,

Hello, gamergators, who is going to our next victim of harassment?

>>14735303

The average scores of UK born Blacks are near or above the White norm depending on the immigrant group, according to data from achievement tests which correlate strongly to IQ (and g)

http://www.unz.com/article/the-iq-gap-is-no-longer-a-black-and-white-issue/

http://www.unz.com/article/closing-the-black-white-iq-gap-debate-part-i/

>>14735328

James Alefantis, John Podesta. Now that this is the Q and Trump show, mission accomplished. Zero PG arrest to this day. Zero revelations to the sheeple. No storm.

>>14735277

All mobilegames suck.

>>14735286

>Hispanics got something like +50

Is that for all Hispanics or only non-white Hispanics? I've seen white Hispanics be discriminated against just like native white U.S./European.

>>14735354

Sometime, somewhere, some guy has spent Mother's Day balls deep in his mom while looking at incest porn together. Probably in Japan.

>>14735353

>I am now imagining Kanye West as Porunga

fug

>>14735277

>Did the pyschologist/mental health person/social scientist/whatever that started a dispute with zombiunicorn before the stream pitch in after the whole travesty and dust setted down

I think she did a complete writedown of how their statistics were bullshit. I know Adland covered it since this guerilla marketing company has been involved in other fake activism campaigns in the past.

>>14735399

Damn. I can't find Aggretsuko episodes here, where would I download them?

>>14735397

Try a parcel forwarding company I guess. Tenso is one I know of. It gets shipped to them and for an extra fee they ship it to you.

>>14735399

i need an idol christmas cake game.

>>14735428

Same here, what did you buy?

I bought nuPrey on sale, it's not that bad but still.

>>14735443

Monster Hunter World

>>14735448

It's not that bad, it could be GoW: Wife's son edition or Destiny 2.

>>14735482

Top kek.

>>14735460

I'm bored. All I've had to really play is Yakuza Kiwami. Wanted something different. Didn't end up enjoying it.

>>14735480

Well the game I was considering getting next is Dad of Boi.

>>14735494

>the game I was considering getting next is Dad of Boi

don't

just go back to playing Yakuza

>>14735494

>got bored playing Kiwami

>wants a worse game instead

Why?

>>14735515

Well it was Yakuza 0 then Kiwami back to back. So I've just kind of had a fatigue right now.

>>14735494

Get Everybody's Golf

Eurogamer: "The mainstream media's inevitable attack on "addictive" Fortnite has begun"

https://archive.is/DTYEv

Ars Technica: "Despite backlash, loot boxes could be essential to gaming’s future"

https://archive.is/KkbZo

Sandy A. Kenyon - "VR has promises, but studies show 'disturbing' risks for children"

https://archive.is/xjceR

http://archive.fo/g3OVK

Jeff Grubb / VentureBeat - "Red Dead Redemption II must deconstruct the American Frontier mythology"

https://archive.fo/Ru0Cv

Jason Schreier (Kotaku) uses the "recommended stories" to push his agenda by linking the same article 9 times

https://archive.is/28HrN

http://archive.is/aD2mb

https://archive.is/RkAfO

http://archive.fo/r7hnL

>>14735530

>VR has promises, but studies show 'disturbing' risks for children

Right now it’s a sad fact that there is a worldwide Satanic Pedophile Cabal that has infiltrated and hijacked America and runs the United States Government and most of it major institutions.

>>14735330

It even says that they are only catching up/overtaking when compared to poor working class whites, the moment it jumps up to middle class the divide grows. in my experience white working class schools barely get any funding, the school I went to didn't even have carpets in the classrooms and our maps still had Yugoslavia and the USSR on them, and this was in the mid 2000's

>>14735544

Mixed people in the UK happen to be on par with whites in IQ.

https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/glassessment.pdf

>>14735555

yes, and?

>>14735566

There are actually several studies saying that mixed people with white mothers have IQs around the white average. Which supports what this article says:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-imprinted-brain/201002/identical-genetically-different-and-why-you-can-thank-your-mother

>>14735569

I wasn't talking about mixed whites though

>>14735517

Oh, I understand, yeah it's best to take breaks between games.

But really, God of BOY is a pretty bad game that you'll probably never even replay. Not worth it at all.

>>14735517

Persona 5 is on sale right now, as if Nir Automata. Those are better choices.

>>14735573

You're probably right. I think I just need a good break right now then. But at the same time I feel so bored.

>>14735429

You know, it seems like they would make the perfect idols, since they're basically forever alone anyway, so there'd be no danger of them being photographed coming out of a love hotel.

>>14735494

>Wanted something different

Why not stop playing modern games and try some old classics, like, say, Battletoads?

>>14735590

Did you even get past level 3?

>>14735607

Bikes are hard, especially when you get them to the face.

>>14735360

I have no idea. I don't remember the post being that detailed, but it wouldn't surprise me if they expected light skinned hispanics to be overcome with white guilt and check the white box.

>>14735635

>Shadow of the Beast

That's actually a great idea.

>>14735596

>Did you even get past level 3

I 1cc'd the damn game warpless. Something tells me you need to git gud. Volkmire's Inferno and Terra Tubes are honestly my least favorite stages in the game. RNG-infested pieces of shit.

>>14735635

>>Those pics

>What the Hell am I looking at?

Steganography.

There's some program to decode it.

>>14735397

That's a very static gif.

I don't want to go back to Twitter but it looks like I don't have a choice.

>mombot only comes back after the super rich fag asks

I bet she's a cock-hungry slut, fuck her

>>14735494

>I'm bored.

dont you have a fucking backlog of vidya? arent you learning moonrunes?

>>14735688

When you turned 20-30s fully understood what your mother did why would you not murder her?

>>14735690

>tfw have a massive backlog but no time to play any games, but a fuckton of cash to buy them so I buy them just have them not being played

>>14735704

Is Jontron still alive?

>>14735652

I never got past the snow level.

>>14735635

>Also, wasn't there a race of people that the American-Indians wipe out long before the Europeans came?

The actual Native Americans were the Clovis point People. They were from the same relict tribe as the Ainu in Northern Japan.

Muh noble savages killed and ate these Native Americans as they stole their land, which they then later traded to muh evil white man for beads and booze.

>>14735704

>>14735745

The newfaggotry is unreal

>>14735749

Wrong. Clovis people are considered to be the ancestors of most of the indigenous cultures of the Americas.

>>14735713

What

>>14735397

>GAMERGATE HELP

No.

>>14735763

>Source: Wikipedia.

>>14735773

>The DNA shows that the child belonged to a group that is a direct ancestor to as many as 80 percent of the Native Americans tribes alive today, he said: “It’s almost like he is a missing link” between the first arrivals and today’s tribes.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-science-native-americans-origins/ancient-native-boys-genome-reignites-debate-over-first-americans-idUSBREA1B1TS20140212

>>14735408

My dragon dildos arrived.

>>14735781

Why did the other one have a beard?

>>14735789

Beards are manly.

>>14735789

probably cause he didn't shave.

>>14735794

>morning

NEET detected.

>>14735788

Remember to start with one at a time, Anon.

>>14735801

pleb

>>14735801

I have like 5 now, lol

>>14735816

At once?

>>14735823

No, but it makes me realize I've spent more on silicone sculptures in the last 5 years than I have on videogames.

The absolute state of this industry

>>14735270

>Error. This file may not contain steganographic data, or you may have specified an incorrect password.

>>14735765

Is Yakuza 0 a good start?

>>14735731

Yes.

>>14735887

No, play the original 2 first

>>14735878

You're right, I should tone my shitposting down a little bit. Thanks.

>>14735887

Yeah.

>>14735887

Play all the games numbered by prime numbers first, but in reverse order.

>>14735822

I'm on to you (((Supabus)))

>>14735829

I knew a guy who worked in a game store that looked just like that.

>>14735909

But isn't it a good game?

>>14735887

It was made to be both a decent start (with the coming remakes and hint at a PS4 port of 3, 4, 5.) and a great romp for people who played the series because of all the references.

You get much more out of it if you played the games in release order, however. It's up to you, really.

>>14735909

Most of the current gamers are all for spectacle over gameplay, you should know this by now. That's why games like Last of Us are heralded as amazing while games that require thought and skill get swept under the rug.

>>14735909

It's the same wshit with Uncharted lad, do you know how this works?

This is Disney tier shit done by Sony

>>14735915

Mark pls

>>14735917

Go on a shooting spree.

>>14735330

>chandra chisala

what a rabbithole of shit, are you a secret marxist?

http://www.unz.com/jthompson/chisala-and-powerpoint-publishing/

>>14735909

>Surprised that Sonyggers bought a shit game

Look at the top selling games on the PS4 and you'll be even more disheartened.

>>14735909

>>14735942

Play the original 2 first, then play 0 and everything else in numeral order.

>>14735942

Save money and just play 0 and the Kiwami remakes.

>>14735873

It's NISA, as like as anything the progression block was the bug instead of intentional. It's also likely to still be there when they release the game

>>14735930

Don't say that. I live in Canada and they might take that as probable cause to arrest me for the crime of being a lonely, horny loser.

>>14735965

>okuu san

Reminder that 95% of the porn about her is NTR

>>14735969

people just hate her and her husbando being happy.

>>14735965

Tuck me in. Let me die.

>>14735399

I wish nyaa had a file listing for their torrents. I want a specific fakku release and that retarded spreadsheet they linked in the descriptions doesn't have a single sheet containing the info I actually want, which is the artist name, the release name, and the release number. I don't want to download every fucking torrent just for this one release.

>>14735981

Right after I typed that I found the file listing option. I'm still mad about that spreadsheet.

>>14735969

Not in my mind it isn't.

>>14735978

This

>>14735993

The blatant homoerotic imagery in God of War makes me uncomfortable.

>>14735909

>I was hoping that the user scores would at least reflect something

>>14735926

Anon, I actually took the time to look at some of the accounts posting positive reviews, and Dad of Soy was the only game the account had ever reviewed (With a bonus of one account being named something like "PS4USER", having the review in Chinese, and only other reviewed game on the account be Uncharted 4 with a 10/10, oh, and the review for Uncharted 4 was in English)

>>14735936

<This guy actually played through the game in under 8 hours.

>>14735993

GoW 1 was created to be a standalone with a few jokes of possible sequels. Then Sony told them to make a sequel.

>>14736016

That one was just neat bonus video, but the other bonus video that shows that Kratos is the son of Zeus leaves far stronger seeds for the sequel.

>>14735964

Transition into a girl, they won't touch you them.

>>14736061

I don't wanna be a girl. I just want someone to want me in some way.

>>14736068

I want you, purely as a friend to play vidya with and nothing more. That sound fine?

>>14736072

I guess. It doesn't change much though since I wasn't gonna kill anyone. I wish the media was as worried about actual terrorists as they are about a bunch of fat losers jerking off to anime porn because women don't like them.

>>14736050

Remember the easter egg phone call?

>>14736081

Last time I checked you can still call both numbers that are in the game, that's some dedication.

>>14736077

These are the same people that claim being called "Fake News" is a hate crime while calling Infowars "Fake News". They are scumbags, don't ever believe they will care about the common man.

>>14735893

Can I skip 3? I'm in the middle of 2 right now and it would be easy for me to play 4, but 3 would be an issue.

>>14736108

Infowars is fake news

>>14736108

It's pretty depressing. I'm used to being hated but now there's people calling for incels to be labelled a fucking terrorist group or whatever. I feel like if you really want to deal with this perceived incel "problem", the easiest way to do it would be to treat us like human beings. A little kindness goes a long way.

>claim being called "Fake News" is a hate crime

And they're the ones who used the phrase first, just to make it even better. It's just bad now that it's being turned on them.

>>14736125

Isn't that what they said to do about Muslims committing terrorism?

>>14736124

Yeah. GoW was supposed to be a standalone, Kratos was forgiven, became a god and supposed to learn how to live with himself after all that. The Fate of the Titan bonus video had a modern world with talks of a new protagonist, which would have been a preferable direction than the one they went for GoW 2.

>>14736125

Do you fuck dogs?

https://pastebin.com/ECxJLcaR

>>14736150

The only thing I fuck is a cheap onahole I bought online last year.

>>14736155

But given the opportunity you would fuck a dog, correct?

>>14736136

When did you take a selfie with Alex?

>>14736145

Those terrorists just kill to get those 72 virgins, their motives are about the same a incel terrorists - sexual frustration.

>>14736176

nice try Slomo

>>14736161

>no dolphin pussy copypasta

>>14736241

He still hasn't killed himself?

>>14736263

>acting like supporting gay marriage is a good thing

you have to go back.

>>14736159

No.

>>14736241

I'm sure if the small, specific subset of Christians you poll here had been raised to believe that lying about their beliefs was not only acceptable but necessary, you'd have seen a lot of them lying on the poll too.

>>14736260

Why did you have leopard print cat ears to need the skirt to go with?

>>14736241

>>14736285

https://archive.is/11uBa

FOR THE 10,000TH TIME

ARCHIVE OR FUCK OFF

>>14736241

>Christian does something that contradicts his teachings

<HAH YOU SEE THIS IS WHY WHYTE MEN SUCK YOURE RAIL E GUN IS OUTDATED BAKE THE CAKE BIGOT

<Alternatively, MUH GOD DONT REAL

>Muslim does something that contradicts his teachings

<Oy vey don't judge them all by the actions of one, they have a great culture! Who cares if its legal to kill gays we pretend to care about in muslim-majority nations!

I fucking hate leftists.

>>14736268

>Implying that's what he said at all

You go back.

>>14736270

lol fag

>>14736292

If I wanted to fuck something that smells awful, shits in the street, and is covered in hair I'd date an Indian girl.

>>14736282

They'd sold out of tiger ones.

>>14736327

Momthot.

http://archive.is/CNBAH

>money being given to literal muslim terrorist supporters "to pay wages for student workers during the summer"

This is only notable because earlier this year a bunch of Christian organizations were denied the same grant…because they disapprove of abortion. Trudeau's government is literally funnelling money to terrorists rather than give money to people who happen to not agree with abortion.

>>14736260

Show your old cunt.

>>14736322

Dogs smell better and are less hairy than Indians

>>14736348

Yeah but they're not human. If I'm going to put my penis in something that's not a human woman, I might as well stick with my onahole. Less trouble.

>>14736345

rude tbh onii-fam

>>14736360

Face it anon, you're just gay if you don't want that sweet sweet bitch pussy I'll stop shitposting now

>>14736009

>Open vid

>Instantly met with the sound of smacking lips and shifting saliva as he eats into the mic

God damn it I fucking hate streamers

>>14736372

Good. I might get a dog eventually, though. I always wanted one and it would be nice to have a big cuddly friend always around.

>>14736009

>Anon, I actually took the time to look at some of the accounts posting positive reviews, and Dad of Soy was the only game the account had ever reviewed (With a bonus of one account being named something like "PS4USER", having the review in Chinese, and only other reviewed game on the account be Uncharted 4 with a 10/10, oh, and the review for Uncharted 4 was in English)

Are there a lot? Can't that sort of thing be reported for fake review spamming?

>>14736394

Well, most of the hentai I like probably is too. I like /ss/. Everything fun is either illegal or taxed to hell here. I think Trudeau is actually autistic because his government increased taxes, last summer, on everything you might want to do during summer break. If you're going to make gas, liquor, cigs, etc all more expensive, don't do it when people are going to take notice and get mad.

>>14736401

I figured I'd just get a big mutt of some kind to hopefully avoid some of those issues. I don't want a little yappy one is all. I want a big one that I can hug in my bed at night and it won't mind because it's big too so it's not scared of me.

>>14736324

Why did you buy tiger ears?

I'm mad now. Canada is a shit country.

>>14736435

>>14736401

Fuck I forgot how much I love dogs. I may need to get one myself once I have a job.

>>14736455

Yes it is.

>>14736413

I didn't - I said they'd sold out of tiger ones so I got leopard ones.

>>14736470

Sorry what I meant to say is, why were you trying to buy tiger ones?

>>14736435

The issue with pure-breeds is more the massive interbreeding to produce them than the fact that they are inherently worse. Still the reality is that you want to avoid them.

>>14736454

>what you're thinking about doing

Masturbating to hentai and watching movies while I play my old DS Lite?

>>14736526

I'm wary of Tim Pool because he likes to cover for his friends. Not convinced we'll get fair coverage from someone like that.

>>14736526

Get Tim Pool in contact as in right now. It's time to actually show what #GamerGate really is from its "ethics in journalism" shenanigans.

>>14736533

*Inbreeding fuck me

>>14736543

Hes fine nigger

>>14736570

He's been covering Maddox's ass on his anti-free speech lawsuit since the day it was filed. Because they're friends.

>>14736545

I already Twittered at him. We'll see what happens.

>>14736572

>Because they're friends.

Didn't another Anon post last bread that Pool and Maddox barely know each other and have only met a few times?

>>14736572

Who cares about Maddox honestly?

Why deny an advantage because hes a fucktard about one guy?

>>14736577

They had according to Tim, no more than 7 interactions.

>>14736578

One guy? He's suing 3 people (failed to serve a 4th) and two companies because somebody called him a cuck on the internet. He's spent this long denying that there's a story there, but he'll go look at dicks in a museum for a story. I don't trust he'll be fair. That's it.

>>14736577

They've done videos together and Tim sure does seem to have his back on Twitter a lot. Hence my distrust. He did recently (an hour or two ago) admit that maybe he was wrong, but I'm very wary.

>>14736575

Did he respond at all? I sent him a tweet too regarding the matter and I got no response.

>>14736585

That's a strange promotion.

>>14736614

Nothing yet. He probably gets a million tweets a day, so it may take a bit to get noticed,

>>14735325

My mom said to not buy her anything.

Is this a trick or is she saying my gifts suck?

I'm going to anyway

>>14736545

>>14736575

I had actually emailed him about being willing to help him understand it 2 weeks ago and linked him a bunch of resources.

>>14736407

>and it won't mind because it's big too so it's not scared of me.

A dog's size has zero bearing on whether it fears you or not. A dog of any size will be perfectly comfortable sleeping with its owner if it trusts you. I have a chihuahua sleeping next to me right now. You only need to consider the dog's size if, like you mentioned, you don't want a yapping dog or if you like to camp or something and want a dog that won't be carried off by a bird of prey.

>>14736675

I just like big dogs. They're better for cuddling with.

>>14736648

I dunno, I don't know your mom. Maybe she wants you to breed her

>>14736614

>>14736636

Use his email on his website.

>>14736679

Are you a mothercon?

>>14736699

got her nudes?

>>14736699

Buy her a new son and kill yourself

>>14736698

Yes, I am. I'm concerned he'll be unfair to us.

>>14736699

I bought my mom's gift a while back. One of those SNES Classic things. She used to play a lot of SNES when I was a kid.

>>14736702

Not really. My mind has just been twisted by years of hentai and loneliness.

>>14736723

In order for her to fuck a bird she'll have to cut off its head and fuck the neck stump.

>>14736740

Why are you so underage?

>>14736714

That's from a bee sting, mate

>>14736753

don't bully me for my avisodomy fetish

>>14736740

Dull those edges.

>>14736834

He's still alive. Somehow.

>>14736855

What's the nip say dubsman? Is the difference which character becomes dominant in the relationship in the future?

>>14736849

I feel numb

>>14735909

Why it would be a loss for gamergate that a popular blockbuster game is somehow popular?

NuGoW is shit, but it isn't a dumpster fire like most Ubi/EA shit released in the past 5 years, so of course it will not have negative user reviews like them. Normalfags ate the game up 100%.

>Oh but the SJW game journos loved it

And? A broken clock can be right twice a day yadda yadda. The game is much less pozzed than Horizon Zero Awards, the fact that NuGoW sold better than Horizon should be cause for careful optimism.

>>14736935

Why are Jap censorship bars so arbitrary?

>>14736951

I need it too

>>14736951

Have you, like, tried tag searching on a booru?

>>14736963

Yes. I wasn't sure if it was a bikini or lingerie so I went with both and got some good pictures, but not that one.

>>14736969

Tell me the character name and I'll have a go.

>>14736973

Teats McGazongas

>>14736973

I think that would be Jeanne Alter. That's the character I searched under.

>>14736965

I thought the law just stated "You have to censor genitals", but it's so vague as to how and to what extent that artists just slap a black bar across the top and call it good.

>>14736965

i wish the nips stopped the whole thing about censoring fucking porn.

>>14736982

It's worse than that. The actual law is intentionally vague, it says something like "perverted material" or "perverted anathomy" (can't remember, it's been forever since I searched on the subject)

Which is why it's so inconsistent. If you're an artist you have to censor things based on what previous artists got away with (so the usual pixelated genitals) and your own gut feeling.

>>14736998

>after WW2?

i think it was when the burgers forced the rices eaters to open the ports and some captain was invited to eat at a house and the couple showed him some hentai, he got triggered and demanded to make a law against porn or something like that.

>>14737023

Fire up the Gamergate Time Machine we need to fix this.

>>14737023

The captain would probably be a good Christian boy, who knows.

>>14737049

The smart money is on him being a Christcuck.

>>14736989

i thought they were still working on it last i saw. 3d models take a lot of work.

>>14737080

>>14737006

>>14736998

So they're responsible for the surge of tentacle hentai back then? I saw on some late night documentary (decades ago, can't remember which channel) that tentacles were a way to bypass censorship.

>>14736933

>And? A broken clock can be right twice a day yadda yadda. The game is much less pozzed than Horizon Zero Awards

Didn't the director or lead writer himself say in an interview that it was a message against toxic masculinity?

>>14737106

Sex with octopuses was a real thing before hentai.

>>14737108

I heard that he said some non-answer and the SJW journo made that part up, though I haven't seen any confirmation of it.

Still, it's a shit game.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dream_of_the_Fisherman%27s_Wife

>>14737108

No it was an incredibly leading question and he basically circled around it.

https://archive.is/4QI7c

>>14737144

>After the surrender of Japan in 1945, the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers abolished all forms of censorship and controls on Freedom of Speech, which was also integrated into Article 21 of the 1947 Constitution of Japan. However, press censorship remained a reality in the post-war era, especially in matters of pornography, and in political matters deemed subversive by the American government during the occupation of Japan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_Japan

>>14737190

I have a feeling this is projection.

>>14737190

This ain't grade-A asshurt. This is grade-SS butthurt.

>>14737144

>https://archive.fo/uNbkh

>https://www.japantimes.co.jp/culture/2013/01/06/books/book-reviews/complex-tales-of-censorship-in-20th-century-japan/

Here are some highlights from the article:

>But in the first postwar obscenity trial, which started in 1951 over an unauthorized translation of the D.H. Lawrence novel “Lady Chatterley’s Lover,” the Japanese prosecutors were firmly in charge, if at first hesitant about how exactly to proceed since the new constitution, written under Occupation aegis, expressly forbade censorship.

>…

>By the time the Supreme Court handed down its guilty verdict in 1957, the Constitution-vs.-Article-175 debate had long been overshadowed by the judges’ concern, backed by the prosecution’s supposedly “rational” evidence (including lie detector tests purporting to measure sexual response), that the book indeed titillated readers in socially dangerous ways. “At the core of the guilty verdict,” Cather notes, “was the fear that readers would uncritically identify with unscrupulous fictional characters.” Lady Chatterley, c’est moi.

>This landmark trial set a precedent that strongly influenced subsequent obscenity cases, despite differences in medium and shifts in social mores. Judges were concerned with protecting “innocent” readers or viewers, particularly if they were young and female. Also, realism, be it of imagery or description, continued to be cited as contributing to a work’s perceived obscenity. Fiction, even of Lawrence’s highbrow sort, was considered worse than “scientific” depictions, since a skillful writer could conjure visions in a reader’s head more compellingly actual than any anatomical drawing. Lastly, the triumph of the “native” criminal code over the “foreign” constitution in the trial proved lasting.

>Verdicts in succeeding obscenity trials were hardly uniform, however. Tetsuji Takeuchi’s pioneering 1965 pinku (soft-core porn) film “Black Snow” was ruled obscene by the High Court, since the judges regarded its cinematic pornography as more dangerous than the printed variety, while dismissing its “redemptive” ending as too little, too late. On the other hand, a 1972-1980 trial prompted by four soft-core films released by the Nikkatsu studio under its Roman Porno label ended in victory for the defense. This time the prosecution overreached by indicting not only filmmakers, but also the industry self-censorship board Eirin, which had given their work its seal of approval. The High Court judges ended up acquitting everyone, while praising Eirin for maintaining a “minimum degree of sexual morality.”

>…

>Abel, however, rejects the usual evil-censors-versus-heroic-writers story line, persuasively arguing that the reality was more complex and conflicted, with many writers not only passively acquiescent, but actively self-censoring, even after the U.S.-led Occupation supposedly freed them from wartime strictures.

>He takes this argument into dense thickets of academic jargon and on shaky flights of theorizing, but his thorough, wide-ranging research has also uncovered long-buried works and long-forgotten authors, while upending received wisdom about censorship in the period.

>In place of the cliche of the beady-eyed, text-butchering censor, Abel introduces Takahiro Tachibana, a censor/author who not only published an ironic 1932 memoir about his days wielding a red pencil but later wrote crime fiction using his insider knowledge to evade or deflect censoring by his former colleagues. “As a censor, it was Tachibana’s duty to ban literature that might be deemed to disturb the masses,” Abel writes, but as an author he produced crime fiction that was on a par “with the master he had banned.”

>In addition to such individual portraits, Abel offers more broad-ranging data, from obscure lists of banned prewar books (some of which later surfaced in postwar editions) to a chart showing that nearly half the authors serialized in the widely circulated Asahi newspaper from 1932 to 1961 were banned by the Home Ministry while, postwar, 44 percent were banned by the Occupation. These were not wild-eyed radicals, but popular, established writers who found themselves, in Abel’s words, as both “censored and canonized.”

Going by the latter half of that one article, it appears that the Japanese actually experienced greater freedom of speech both during and after the occupation than before it.

>>14737200

>>14737190

Who in their right minds wouldn't shower for weeks on end?!

>>14737270

twitter.com/NightCoreVespa/status/992089037144903680

https://archive.is/9KeqN

Personally, I don't think it's worth an archive, but here it is anyways.

I was never a fan of God of War but from watching playthroughs what the old ones seem to do very well are the animations.

>>14736933

It's only bad for the industry since it will push games more to cinematic story driven bullshit

>>14737269

I don't understand those who don't shower often.

>>14737144

>Obscenity In Japan: Moral Guidance Without Legal Guidance

And, some highlights from this article.

>In order for Japan to progress, Article 175 needs to be reviewed, revised, and, possibly, removed.

>Japan is a civil law country. As such, it is important to know how the court system works in a civil law country. Technically, the lower courts in a civil law system are not bound to follow the decisions of the higher courts. This is because precedent does not exist in these countries. However, in practice, the lower courts often defer to the opinion of the higher courts and create a linear, consistent application of a rule. Each level of court is also allowed to review the case de novo, which means they do not have to accept the facts found by the preceding court and can decide a case by its own interpretation of the facts and issues.

>This paper will explore the problems that Article 175 of the Japan Penal Code creates by examining the history of how the courts have applied and defined the various parts of Article 175 in relation to the various genres of artistic expression. It will show how the courts had trouble applying the code beginning with the very first major case and how they have continued to have conflicting ideas on how the code should be applied in different situations. Finally, the paper will propose solutions to these problems and explore what the best option for Japan would be in the realm of obscenity regulation.

>…

>While Article 175 had been on the books since 1907, it was typically enforced by the Japanese police force in a way that only stopped publication of "obscene" materials. It was not until 1957 that the Japanese Supreme Court heard its first case involving the violation of Article 175. This case was Koyama v. Japan, also known as the Lady Chatterley Lover's case. Lady Chatterley's Lover was written by D.H. Lawrence, a British author. This book was the subject of many obscenity cases across the world due to its descriptions of the sexual encounters between the main character, Lady Chatterley, and her groundskeeper. Its scandalous nature was increased by the fact that, at the time of her activities with the groundskeeper, Lady Chatterley was married to a man paralyzed during World War I at the time of her activities with the groundskeeper. The Japanese case involved the translator of D.H. Lawrence's infamous book, Sei Ito, and the publisher of the translated book, Kyujiro Koyama. The two were accused, and ultimately convicted, under the Penal Code's obscenity provisions for the translation, publication, and distribution of the book. According to the prosecution and the Court, there were twelve passages in the book that were considered obscene.

>…

>The Supreme Court began their decision by defining the term "obscene writing (picture or other object)." The Court held that, "to be obscene, the literature in question must be such that it is harmful to the normal feeling of shame, excites and stimulates sexual desire, and runs counter to good moral concepts regarding sex." The Court supported their holding, by relying not upon legal reasoning, but upon philosophical reasoning. That reasoning, reflective of the attitudes of the day, dictated that mankind across the world possesses an inherent, natural sense of shame in regards to the act of sex.9 The Court continued to flesh out this reasoning by stating that this sense of shame separates mankind from animals and that no culture on Earth allows sexual acts to be performed in public.10 Finally, the Court stated that in all cultures the sex act is a private act indicative of the sense of shame the act produces.

>…

>The Court reasoned that since obscene literature excites and stimulates sexual desire, it must, therefore, produce a sense of shame in the reader. The Court believed that too much literary stimulation would do several things. First, it would paralyze mankind's innately good conscious in regards to the subject of sexual intercourse and sex-related matters. Second, this paralyzing would lead mankind to lose its control of reason. Lastly, this loss of reasoning power would make mankind behave, "licentiously and unrestrainedly, and induce him to defy the established concept of sex morality and order." The Court reasoned that this de-habilitating outcome was enough to ban the production and distribution of obscene writing, as it could result in chaos and confusion across society if enough reader were reading obscene material at the same time.

…

>>14737305

>On its face, Article 175 appears to be in conflict with Article 21 of the Japanese Constitution's ban on censorship. Article 21 was created in response to the severe censorship acts of the Japanese government during World War II that left only propaganda materials in publication. The Court found that there was no conflict between the two articles by holding that Article 175 of the Penal Code to be an exception to Article 21 of the Japanese Constitution. The Court acknowledged that Article 21 does, indeed, prohibit censoring by the government, but it explicitly allows censoring in the name of protecting public welfare. The Court concluded that obscenity clearly falls in the category of public welfare matters for the reasons previously stated. It seems that the Court found a hole in the purpose of Article 21 to legitimize its wanted outcome, that of outlawing sexually explicit materials.

>…

>Lady Chatterley had gained acceptance throughout the West as a piece of valuable literature by the 1950's. The Court acknowledged this and the majority agreed that the work is not pornographic in nature. However, the Court went on to declare that its value as a piece of literature did not mean that the work is not to be considered obscene. The Court believed that art and obscenity are two separate concepts belonging to two different determinations and that would be a logical error to assume that, "an obscene writing cannot be called true art, or that true art can never be obscene." Therefore, a work's artistic value may not be considered when determining its obscenity status.

>The Court is also not to take into consideration what society believes to be obscene. The Court acknowledged that the concepts of shame and sex change over time, but it felt that this should not influence the Court. The Court should continue to uphold the idea that sex is inherently shameful and obscene. It reiterated that the support for this lies in the Court's belief that public acts of sex are seen as shameful in all cultures. The courts are, "invested with the duty of protecting society from moral degeneration," and must approach the problem of obscenity with a logical, critical attitude like a doctor treating a patient. Thus, the changing attitudes of society are not to be taken into account by the courts and the courts are to take the approach of an objective viewer when faced with questions of obscenity.

>Justice Mano, joined by Justice Kobayashi, dissented from the majority's opinion and pointed out several flaws in the Court's reasoning. He pointed out that the definition of obscenity changes according to race, age, and customs as well as changing gradually throughout time. He argued that the courts should rule in accordance to present day standards and should be allowed to shift and change with the changing social conditions. He did not agree that the concept of obscenity should be constant or that the courts should act like an objective doctor, applying the same rule throughout time and case. He stated that it was once the custom of many Northern prefectures to hold a festival called "utagaki" or "kagai" to aid in the selection of a spouse by the younger people. The custom was for men and women to walk up into a sacred mountain together and, once there, to feast, sing, dance, and engage in open, public acts of sex. He stated that this custom was for both married and unmarried people. He also relates the lyrics of a song from Manyoshu that says, "In 'kagau-kagai', may I also participate in intercourse with another's wife, and let others commune with my wife." He points out that these events did not happen only once, but were regular affairs. Thus showing that the majority was wrong in thinking that public acts of sex are always regarded as shameful. This has not been true in the justices' own country throughout history and, certainly, cannot be assumed to be the truth throughout all cultures and time. He then cites Judge Hand from the United States Supreme Court as support when he said, "it is unthinkable that, in actual practice, the sense of shame should forever bar expression of the most beautiful and important aspect of human nature."

…

>Those people who made that beach body ready ad are now making a fat inclusive one to talk about how they learned and want to promote body positivity.

>The SPLC is now talking about the "Incel movement" and the dangers of awkward people.

How retarded can people get? The one company that got praised for having balls is now telling their old fans to fuck off.

>>14737307

>To violate the principle of sex acts being private in nature, the actual act of sex must be performed openly. A book, being an inanimate object, cannot perform a sex act publicly. Also, the scenes of sexual intercourse in the present book were not depictions of the sex act being performed in a public setting, but, rather, they all take place in a private setting. The majority had argued that the book violated the universal law, a law that does not change by place or time, that sex is a private act. Mano points out that this is flawed because the book had already been published in France, Italy, and Germany without being deemed obscene. Therefore, the idea that these scenes are obscene due to their violation of a universal law cannot be accepted.

>Finally, Mano criticizes the idea that the courts are to act as moral leaders and protect society from moral harm. While a case can be deemed obscene from a legal point of view, the idea of "protecting society from moral degeneration" is a dangerous one. Mano feared that the justification could be used in cases outside of those involving obscenity and could eventually lead to over-control by the courts and the violation of basic human rights. Clearly, Justice Mano was looking towards the future in his comments and show that the first major case dealing with Article 175 was flawed from the beginning.

>In 1969, the Supreme Court refined, and slightly redefined, its definition of obscenity in another literature case. This case is known as the De Sade case (or Ishii v. Japan) and, like Lady Chatterley's Lover, concerned the translation of a foreign piece of literature. This time it was the Marquis De Sade's The History of Juliette, or Vice Rewarded. The facts of De Sadeare similar to those of Lady Chatterley in that it concerned the arrest of the translator and publisher of the novel for the crime of distributing obscene material. The general outcome was also the same in that the two were found guilty for the same reasons as those in Lady Chatterley. The Court even clarified their previous holding by stating that, "obscene sections render an entire work obscene." However, what changed in this case was the Court's opinion regarding the weight of artistic value in the determination of whether a material is obscene. The Court, in this case, stated that artistic value could potentially absolve a material from the label of obscenity though it did not in the present case. Instead of a few pieces of obscene materials rendering an entire work obscene as in Lady Chatterley, the overall artistic value of the work, outside of the obscene parts, could absolve an entire work from the charge of obscenity. This is clearly in conflict with what the Supreme Court intended in the Lady Chatterley case.

…

>>14737347

>>Those people who made that beach body ready ad are now making a fat inclusive one to talk about how they learned and want to promote body positivity.

I demand a source of this claim.

>>14737356

Never mind. I misread something and it is an alternative company trying to mock the company. Please bully me for being dumb and tired.

>>14737351

>>In a single trial that spanned the next decade, the Court further refined, and redefined, the test for determining obscenity in a final literary case concerning a Japanese short-story. The story in question was Yojohan fusuma no shitbari (What I Found in the Sliding Doors of the Four-and-a-half-mat Room) and the trial was one of the first trials involving Article 175 that was charged with current societal attitudes towards politics. The story is only ten pages long and was originally published in the early 1920's. It was published under the pen-name of Kinpu Sanjin, but several pieces of evidence point to the author being the celebrated Japanese author Nagai Kafu. Kafu himself denied writing the story during his lifetime. When questioned by police during an investigation of a publisher who had printed the story in 1948, Kafu said that he had written a story called Yojohan fusuma no shitabari for publication in a magazine in 1917. However, his version was a morally clean version and not the obscene version under question. His denials of authorship may have been because he sought to escape being accused of violating Article 175 and forced to stand trial. It is important to note that the work was found to be obscene and publisher of the 1948 publication was found guilty of violating Article 175 in 1950 at the district court level. This was just two years after Kafu's most explicit denial of authorship, though the trial did little to address the provisions of Article 175. Clearly, Kafu was smart to deny writing the sexually explicit version of the story if he was denying authorship simply to avoid being arrested. The accused in this trial were, "author Nosaka Aikuyuki and publisher Sato Yoshino who had republished the story in a humorous literary journal Omoshiro hanbun (Half serious) in 1972." Both were owners of the magazine publication. The prosecution did its best to separate Kafu from the piece and condemn the accused of republishing old pornography, so as to avoid attacking the credibility of a celebrated national author. The defense did its best to link Kafu to the story and to make it seem that the accused were only reprinting a work of both nationalistic and literary value to Japanese culture. The trial was during the time of a resurgence of nationalism in Japan. Thus, the Supreme Court was cornered because, if it found the accused guilty, they were potentially finding Kafu guilty of obscenity. Doing this would be seen as unpatriotic and highly criticized by the public.

>…

>This hints to the importance of society's opinion in the Court's decisions even though Lady Chatterley explicitly said that society's values should not play into the decisions of the courts in Article 175 cases. To start with, the Court, in accordance with previous decisions, decided to follow the objective view standard and dismissed any considerations. The Court insisted that native legal precedent and not literary values were the standards to be used in considering Article 175 violations. The justices then went on to consider, and focus their decision on, "the method of sales in terms of printing, binding, advertising, and the inclusion of introductions and essays. This was the first time that materials outside of the main artistic piece were taken into consideration as violating Article 175.

>…

>Just as with Lady Chatterley, the Court acknowledged the literary value of the piece and praised its writing style, but determined that the work "was dangerously sensual, apt to lure the unsuspecting readers into a passive prurient reading experience." The Court felt that the, "story invited an entirely sensory, passive experience akin to watching visual media." By stating this, the Court essentially narrowed the test for obscenity. Instead of the simple objective standard based solely on the words of the text, as previously used by the courts, this Court defined obscenity in terms of its effects on the minds of the readers by considering the entire effect of the main piece in combination with outside accompanying materials. Thus, the Court created yet another test in determining whether a piece of work is completely obscene or is artistic. Since this trial, no other strictly literary work has been accused of violating Article 175.

…

>>14737207

https://twitter.com/NightCoreVespa/status/992171043874799616

>>14737368

>The first film to be accused of obscenity was Nikutai no Ichiba (Market of Flesh). This film was also the first of the pink-eiga films. Pink-eiga films are pornography films that are typically low-budget, are at least an hour long, and attempt to observe the obscenity laws of Japan by using props, mosaics, and other means to hide the forbidden images during sexual intercourse scenes. The use of mosaics and blurring, collectively called bokashi, has been the most proliferate method of censoring.79 During the time of these trials, visual depictions of sexual intercourse could not include the display of genitals or pubic hair. These were due to the regulations imposed by EIRIN. EIRIN stands for Eirin Kanri Linkai and is Japan's Administration Commission of Motion Picture Code of Ethics. Like the Motion Picture Association of America in the U.S.A., the EIRIN is, "an independent and non-governmental committee of censorship elected and regulated by [its] own members of the Japanese film industry." Its members include members of major film studios, professors, and lawyers. Since 1962, major commercial theaters have not been allowed to show a film without an EIRIN rating and are obligated to not allow persons under 18 into a film with the rating of R-18. The day after its opening, the Tokyo Metropolitan Police cancelled the screening and accused Market of the Flesh of obscenity. Though it was the first film to be accused of obscenity, its charge never reached the courts because the director consented to editing of the film and it was released without the "obscene" parts. It is important, however, in that it shows the beginning of films being accused of violating Article 175 and that by censoring, a film may exonerate itself from an obscenity accusation.

>…

>Unlike Market of the Flesh, the 1965 film Kuroi Yuki (Black Snow) was accused of violating Article 175 and went to trial. The party arrested was the director, Tetsuji Takechi. It is important to note that the major Japanese film company, Nikkatsu, produced the film because Nikkatsu held several positions in the EIRIN and many of their films were passed by the EIRIN as not obscene, though they were later accused of violating Article 175. The courts often give deference to the opinions of artistic associations in their determinations of obscenity. Thus, to have a film passed by the EIRIN, only then to be accused of obscenity, is significant. One of the scenes at issue in this trial was a scene showing, "a young woman running naked along the fence of a the airbase in Yokota." The scene was shot in one long, five-minute take. Takechi defended that the shot was taken this way for artistic reasons. He claimed that filming the scene in any other way would not fit with the "traditional model of Japanese aesthetics."The case was widely publicized because of the support given to Takechi's argument by well-known Japanese artists that differed with Takechi on a political level like Yukio Mishima. These artists, "defended the artistic value of the film as well as the freedom of expression of the artist." The Supreme Court, for the first time, accepted the artistic expression argument and Takechi was found innocent of all charges in September of 1967. This case proceeded De Sade and provides some basis for the later decision where the Court stated that the artistic value of a book might absolve a book from being declared completely obscene.

>…

>The courts have consistently changed the standards by which works are to be judged in Article 175 violations and have refused to give a clear set of definitions and guidelines to the various artistic genres on what is considered obscene in each area. The courts are free to consider the artistic value of a work, the current societal values, outside materials related to the main work, the effects of the work on audiences, and previous decisions or they are free to ignore all of these things and take a narrow, objective view. Without a clear set of standard and with varying views on how the court will respond to an obscenity related case, artists and their lawyers have little to guide them in their creations and defenses.

…