/v/ - Video Games

>>14464073

Doom 2 multiplayer

Quake 3

Fightan games

>friends

>steam

>>>reddit

Lost Planet 2

>GFWL

>>14464073

Tower unite is good if it weren't so expensive for what it is. There honestly aren't that many fun multiplayer games. Civ I guess? Play 5.

>>14464107

>having friends means you're reddit

???

>>14464107

You redirect like this

>>>/reddit/

Shameful display. Now check my dubs

party games are fun, namely smash

>>14464204

I agree fellow redditor, Tencent deserves our money

100 orange Jews

Braindead 2

EYE

EYE

EDF

Vermintide

vermintide 2 and deep rock galactic, both are fun when you play it with friends

Battleblock Theater.

Any game shitty or not is good with friends.

Check

My

Dubs

>>14465212

And the EULA of every console also says they can brick your console whenever the fuck they want. It's never happened so it's a fucking invalid argument. Also:

>fuck your legal rights up the ass

If something in a ToS or EULA violates the law. They cannot act upon it or else they'll face legal action, dumbass. They can't fuck your legal rights.

>>14465239

Oh of course they could do that, it's not like there will be backlash or anything right? Bitch please there's no chance of this happening and if you have any fucking idea about how business works, even theoretical knowledge you could fucking figure they wouldn't just take away people's games. Guess the public relations term is unknown to you, volvo is perfectly fine making cash off steam. There's not a single thing they need to change and it will keep bringing them cash.

Nobody and i fucking mean nobody is stupid enough to fuck up money printing machine like steam

>>14465279

But all of this boils down to

>if you wont accept new ToS you will forfeit your privilege to use the service

Kinda like all other services in the world? What could they possibly change in their ToS that wouldn't bring community uproar and lessened my ability to play games I've paid for?

I'd like to hear a suggestion since as i stated such situations seems impossible to do, maybe you know of some methods i dont know.

Also i've checked just because you asked, i've made my steam acc on 14th march 2009

>>14465350

"Forfeiting your privilege to use the service" is an indirect way of saying "You lose your steam account and everything in it." (They also point out you won't get any refunds or steam wallet disbursement.) When you get steamshit, you don't own the shit you buy (because you buy "subscriptions" allowing you to play the game and not the actual games themselves, this is how they legally weasel into fucking over your property rights, by framing it so it was never your property to begin with - they go out of their way in their ToS to point out you get no ownership of the products you pay for) and they reserve the rights to change the terms of service on you. Also if Steam ever kicks it you're going to lose all your games (If you ask valve, they'll assure you they have contingencies for that, but never mention what those contingencies are, but I'll just tell you right now that Valve's distribution agreements never allowed them to release the shit DRM-free, so it'll most likely die when the DRM platform dies, like what happened to other DRM download services when they died).

>What could they possibly change in their ToS that wouldn't bring community uproar and lessened my ability to play games I've paid for? I'd like to hear a suggestion since as i stated such situations seems impossible to do, maybe you know of some methods i dont know.

Basically they can keep fucking over your rights or if they want to be complete dicks insert new fees and requirements down the road. That's because every time the ToS updates you have to accept the new ToS or forfeit your library. As I said, they already fucked over your right to a class action lawsuit. Nothing is stopping them from making more anti-consumer clauses in new ToS.

>community uproar

You mean the valve dicksucking morons, the extensive marketing shills, and the spineless videogaming press? Valve should be raked over the motherfucking coals for the way their ToS operates and the way their anti-class action lawsuit clause, but you barely hear shit about it. Gamergate needs to rev up some more imo and start targeting bullshit publishers and companies instead of just the godawful spineless press.

>another cuckchan template thread

Fuck off already

>>14465399

If valve did something that was jewish enough to warrant enough backlash they wouldn't do it in the first place.

>>14465527

Try that sentence again in english

>>14465568

if valve did something that was stupid and pissed off a majority of their userbase, most people would go "haha wow this is fucking gay what the fuck stop" then valve would lose money.

That sentence was perfectly understandable too what the fuck

It's like asking a business to hinder themselves even though they're doing well.

>>14465589

>most people would go "haha wow this is fucking gay what the fuck stop" then valve would lose money.

No they wouldn't. Valve already does things that are fucking retarded and people still put up with it.

>That sentence was perfectly understandable too what the fuck

<if valve did something they wouldn't do it

>It's like asking a business to hinder themselves even though they're doing well.

They aren't hindering themselves. They fuck consumers over and end up making more money than they lose by being unethical. Blizzard did this with WoW. They lost literally their entire core audience, over 10 million players, and are still turning a profit because of the remaining cows that end up spending more money on cosmetics and pay to win features than blizzard would get from 9 million subs.

Do you know which country has the most steam accounts? I'll give you a hint, it's not in the western world.