/v/ - Video Games

>>13723519

>And not only is this fucking thing a hundred times more successful than both the Oculus and Vive

Gonna need a source on that buddy boy.

>>13723528

Just look at the support they're giving it versus what Oculus and Vive have been doing.

Both HTC and Oculus have been slashing prices across the board and have stopped almost entirely bringing exclusives. On the other hand, Sony is funding Devs to make games for it and are actually pushing their hardware.

The only Sony VR game I care about is the one with the demon loli. Not enough to spend 300 bucks on a headset though.

SONY, OF ALL PEOPLE, ASKED ME TO SHAMELESSLY SHILL THEIR PRODUCT

Mama look at me.

Posting in a shill thread with no hands!

>>13723540

Like they need someone to shill it for them

So do they pay you or do you do this for free?

>>13723552

>I refuse to believe things that are right in front of me because nobody said it directly in an article posted by a site that does "games journalism"

That's a great point, feel free to believe what you want. The proof is right there and can easily be understood from the situation.

>>13723569

This isn't a console though

>>13723540

I'm sorry that you finally realized that Nintendo and the Switch is shit. It was a hard one to swallow for all of us.

>>13723519

>SONY. OF ALL PEOPLE. Is doing a better job than two tech giants that were ready to capitalize on VR from moment one.

How is Sony not a tech giant ready to capitalize on VR ?

>>13723575

He's been spamming console war shit on a few other threads. Just report him.

>>13723584

its a good thing I never bought it then

>>13723602

Probably worse, you pirate everything and then bitch about the state of gaming while you can't even look in the mirror and realize that you are a parasite that is part of the problem.

>>13723612

>implying there is anything wrong with piracy

>>13723612

>(you)

>>13723612

You will never get my shekels. Cry more blue-haired faggot.

Name a few games worth buying this then.

>>13723612

>paying for shit you don't know you like when you don't have to

I'd be bitter if I found out I was this stupid too, but there's no reason to defend your ego here, anon.

>>13723519

>SONY. OF ALL PEOPLE. Is doing a better job than two tech giants that were ready to capitalize on VR from moment one.

Why is that surprising?

Sony has a track record of producing the best quality micro electronics that goes back to the 1970's.

These other two 'giants' as you call them are a shitty mobile phone company and a shitty american startup that has had too much money thrown at it already.

>>13723885

>that 6 people can try in one night

I feel like this has potential to breed some new ocular centric super bug.

PSVR is getting support, but hte problem is actually fucking sucks.

Playing sitting down with a console controller is absolutely annoying and gets tedious in an hour, after the novelty fades.

VR works well when its roomscale stuff with tracked motion controllers.

Sitting down stuff like the Star Trek game, or VTOLVR are good, otherwise the future is in stuff like Robo Recall or Sairento VR where you can actually do cool shit.

Playing anything VR with a console controller is not fun, especially when you can only sit down. The novelty wears off in less than a week and the PSVR games don't sell well whatsoever since PSVR is broken as fuck.

Shit loses tracking constantly since it uses technology that was not made for any serious tracking and just for waggle gimmicks.

I own a vive and we get a lot of indie titles and experimental stuff, first party or AAA support is indeed rare though

>SONY. OF ALL PEOPLE.

Is OP too young to remember Sony isn't just a console maker?

>>13723909

When you look at their pedigree and track record over the last 40 years it should surprise you more when they get things as wrong as the examples you gave. Not when they get things right.

>>13723568

You can "play" vrchat on a desktop.

Not sure what you get out of it though, I play it occasionally to get why people play it and its just fucking stupid and gay

>>13723968

>What the fuck is their pedigree?

Im thinking specifically of Sonys dominance of the professional TV market.

In the early to mid 80s there was only one brand that could prodice a compact broadcast quality TV camera and that was Sony. Every studio in the world had a number of DXC based Sony ENG cameras.

Obivously they did really well in the consumer market as well with the Trinitron. The walkman. The video 8 consumer grade camera.These were all products which at the time no competing company could produce without making them twice as large.

>>13724009

You're cute anon

>>13724011

You have to be over 18 to post here, reddit.

>>13724023

Quiet cuckchanner

>>13724009

Then download the desktop version, get a stupid anime girl model and be one of the 500 neckbeards running around as an anime girl.

I do not understand what you get out of that, however

>>13724035

>Thats not the case anymore, hasn't been since they still sold VHS.

VHS is an interesting example because Sony's competing version called Betamax was one of their most well known early failures.

Im not saying everything Sony does is a success. But compariny Sonys capabilities with the two other companines OP mentioned, you should expect the Sony product to be superior.

If it was not, that would be the real surprise.

>Nice spacing by the way.

I hate that I do that.

I write a lot of emails every day spaced like that.

>>13723552

>source

sure… let me just grab a huffpo or kotaku article…

go back to reddit

The PS VR is the best option of all VR headsets to be honest. Though, I will not be buying one until they announce PC support.

is what I said BEFORE I got this sick new job and make fuckin bank. I'm buyin myself a PS4 Pro and the VR first paycheck of december

>>13724133

post your top played on steam, pussy. $10 says its TF2, Dota, or CS GO

>>13724148

no. I do own GT Sport tho, so my VR purchase will already be justified :)

Oh, I need to get a wheel first.

ALL I WANT IS A VR HEADSET THAT I CAN PLAY MY ALREADY OWNED VIDYA WITH REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Ross Scott made the perfect video about this problem

>>13724038

>>13724035

>>13724023

>>13724012

>>13724011

>>13723968

>>13723929

Jesus Christ

Fitting in much? Calm down Mr Ballmer

>>13724170

That is fucking terrible though, non native VR is cancer and will either make you sick or realize how pointless it is.

>>13724126

PSVR is fucking awful, loses tracking all the time and its literally a gimmick.

>>13724133

Roomscale VR is great. The problem is the lack of content, there are very few games worth playing in it.

Robo Recall is the highest polished and most accessible. Then there is insanity like Sairento VR with wallrunning, quadruple jumping, backflips and sliding which has a lot of potential, as well as flight sim stuff like VTOL VR which works extremely well.

The problem on /v/ is that barely anyone has tried proper vr and people believe its a gimmick like PS Move, Kinect, the Eyetoy camera or whatever.

The tech is pretty advanced, my vive literally never loses tracking and its frighteningly accurate.

And when we talk about VR, its sony shill threads like this trying to push their shitty broken product.

>>13724272

>Roomscale VR is great.

Is it though?

It's just the same thing as a motion controller.

The most fun I've had with VR were games where I could just move my head and it would control the camera, that being an FPS or a third person game. Having VR + Motion controls is a fucking mess

>>13724279

>Is it though?

Yes it is, there is a reason why Onward VR is popular. You actually do shit like manual reloading, loading the chamber and switching weapons all with your hands and it feels great because it actually works.

>Having VR + Motion controls is a fucking mess

This is utter nonsense you sony shill.

Games for VR that only have headmovement and use a console controller literally don't sell. Nobody wants them, nobody asks them and nobody buys them.

Roomscale stuff like this would be a problem if the controls and tracking were shit, but they're pin-point accurate 99% of the time.

>>13724297

>Nobody wants them, nobody asks them and nobody buys them.

Oh yeah, because the games that do have roomscale VR are SO POPULAR

95% of the games that use roomscale VR consist of you staying in one spot having a square to move in, and then teleporting to another. Even big budget shit like that FPS from the Metro Devs falls into this category.

There's zero games that use that kind of VR well.

>>13724421

And they're all titles where you stand in a spot and shoot at things.

It's trash, they're barely games.

>>13723519

fuck off shill

>>13724449

Even a quick google search proves you wrong

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=PSVR+games

>>13724437

You said roomscale wasn't popular you cancerous sonynigger, I prove you wrong and all you do is backpedal and move the goalpost.

PSVR literally has not even ONE game worth playing.

The VR community for the vive/oculus might be small, but at least we have like 5.

Kill yourself.

>>13724457

Name 3 PSVR exclusives that are worth playing, I dare you.

(Not console ports to VR or multiplats)

>>13724466

All this thread needs now is pedoshit and its gonna be 100% shill

>>13724474

Fuuuck forgot sage

>>13724459

A game that has roomscale being popular doesn't mean SHIT if all the most popular games are the ONLY free to play titles people can get with VR.

Then what about Elite Dangerous or Euro Truck? Those don't have roomscale, and yet they have many more copies than any of those free to play titles. If we actually look at games that cost money that have roomscale support, you can clearly see the biggest sales are barely 80k. Which is anything but popular.

>>13724466

>>13724462

Summer Lesson

Rigs

Playroom

Can you do the same for PC VR that doesn't include ports, or games where you just stand in a spot and shoot at things? Cause I doubt you can

>>13724138

>putting steam on your pc

get a load of this faggot. no wonder you defend VR.

>>13724272

>roomscale VR

>implying even ideal VR would make gaming more fun.

VR is a dead end of gaming that still is not worth the trouble. if i wanted to put alot of money and effort into something so i can run around like a kid pretending to hold a real gun in my hand and shoot at people, i'd go paintballing or become an airsoft autist.

name a fun VR game that is worth getting into and isnt just a novelty amusement to play once or twice.

>>13724490

Lel it took me a moment

>>13724501

>>>/4cuckb/

>>13724498

>Elite Dangerous or Euro Truck

Those sell because they're desktop games and were around before VR was even a thing.

If you think people actively play those in VR more than roomscale stuff you're delusional.

Even people with VR like me play those in desktop mode because their VR support is lacking and its tedious as shit to play them in VR.

>Summer Lesson

Its literally a shitty dating sim, there is no gameplay. Below tech demo tier. But I am not surprised a Sonynigger thinks its a real game

>Rigs

An actual game! Shame its just stupid cockpit game where you use your head to aim and it would be better as a plain desktop or console game.

It seems to be pretty underwhelming.

>Playroom

Literally a minigame collection, you serious?

> PC VR that doesn't include ports, or games where you just stand in a spot and shoot at things?

I already named and even embedded them before you inbred glow in the dark sonynigger

>Onward

>Pavlov VR

>Raw Data

>Sairento VR

>GORN

>Robo Recall (Has teleportation, but is open source and there are locomotions mods for it)

>>13723612

shoo shoo smelly jew

>>13724558

>that video

im curious to see a side by side video with what the players are actually doing with the gameplay. this doesnt look nearly as fun as battlefield 1942. and thats alot of effort to play a game thats not as fun as a 15 year old game.

>>13724558

>If you think people actively play those in VR more than roomscale stuff you're delusional.

The most sold non free to play roomscale VR game sold 100k copies. So I'd wager yes, they probably do, or they're at least extremely close.

Actually, I'd say more people are still playing those games now in Vr rather than something that is roomscale, and that's mostly because those are real game that actually have you doing things rather than just shooting at nameless shit without moving.

>Raw Data

>staying still and shooting at things

>sairento VR

>Early access standing still and using a blade on things

>GORN

>Early acces stand still and waggle weapons on enemies

>Robo Recall

>but muh mods

It's all the same man. All of this is derivative and barely even finished. You're suggesting people play demos.

Even your two great VR shooters, they look awful and ckunky, VR clearly isn't at a point where any gameplay of that kind is actually doable.

>>13724594

>im curious to see a side by side video with what the players are actually doing with the gameplay

Its because you have no idea how this technology works or what it looks like in action

The channel has multiple VR videos that show it off quite well.

>this doesnt look nearly as fun as battlefield 1942.

This is literally a game made by one fucker, it doesn't have vehicles or anything advanced like squads or even really large maps.

>thats alot of effort to play a game

Standing in a room, rotating and occasionally reaching for things is not a lot of effort unless you're terribly fat.

>>13724601

>So I'd wager yes, they probably do, or they're at least extremely close.

Shame you have no evidence to support your claims sonynigger

>>>Raw Data

>>staying still and shooting at things

The game literally has punches that knock you forward, robots that knock you back, locomotion to run

>>>GORN

>>Early acces stand still and waggle weapons on enemies

>Literally multiple modes of locomotion, from simple hold forward to walk, to grab air to pull yourself

>>>Sairento VR

>>Early access standing still and using a blade on things

This game literally has WALLRUNNING, WALLJUMPING, QUADRUPLE JUMPING, SLIDING and BACKFLIPS you fucking moron.

The very first video that play on the steam store page shows that off very explicitly. But you wouldn't know that since you're a Sonyshill

Compared to any other market the VR market is peanuts while being costly to develope, that coupled with shitty tech demo tier games for the foreseeable close future.

All that and I have to agree with people who say VR is a meme, just like faggot OP who came to shill it here again.

>>13724701

We're talking about popularity faggot.

These games clearly aren't popular if nobody's fucking playing them.

>>13724647

>Its because you

its because nobody has released a video like that, dumbass.

>>13724647

>Standing in a room

talking about the purchase and setup, dumbass.

>>13724822

>can't check IDs

hehe

>>13724901

>he got proved so wrong he needs to screencap the thread

Go ahead man, I'd love to see you repost it around and remember just how dumb you are

>>13724929

>(18)

>in a thread you don't care about

>responding to someone you think is a shill

Cmon babe

>>13724862

>being so angry you screencap everything

>implying i read your entire post

wew, you should get a job at a movie theatre.

but seriously. do you have a response to either of the things you said? because "you made 2 posts to call me a dumbass umad" isnt an argument, or were you trying to admit you were wrong on purpose?

>>13723519

>cheapest headset on the market

Wrong. It's the third cheapest, not including garbage-tier and kikestarter special pricing. It's second most expensive if you include the cost of the PS4, which no sane person would have.

>said fuck it and doesn't even require motion controls to be used, unlike all the other headsets

Also wrong, literally all of them can be used without motion controls.

>somehow runs off console hardware

That it might, but it only really runs on console hardware too

>b-but openvr

OpenVR doesn't properly support it, there's only video and gyros.

Switch will get VR and blow all the other headsets away

Switch will get VR and blow all the other headsets away

Switch will get VR and blow all the other headsets away

Switch will get VR and blow all the other headsets away

>>13723885

How does gondola put clothes on if he has no hands at all?

NOBODY WHO OWNS VR HEADSETS USE THEM TO PLAY GAMES

VR headsets are exclusively for porn. The games only exist to provide a convenient excuse for VR headset owners, to prevent the formation of a taboo about owning a VR headset.

Every single VR game is shit that isn't worth your time. That's because they're not actually meant to be played. All they need to do is appear in propaganda videos on media websites and impress your mother for five minutes so she thinks your headset isn't for porn.

>>13725389

Is there even good VR porn?

all I've seen is just kind of meh

>>13725499

Its all regular porn using 3d cameras. No motion control.

>>13725499

Meh or not you're getting the satisfaction of feeling like you're right next to a qt waifu (hopefully with 3D audio). You really can't match that experience with a monitor. It's not worth giving money to jews though so I'll wait till the hardware becomes more affordable then buy it third party like I do with all the shit I can't pirate.

>>13725551

It's just not really what I fap to?

Like, I understand the novelty of being with your animu gf and I'd fap to it maybe twice, but after that it really becomes old. I'd still go for a good ole doujin or a video.

>>13725569

Lewd games are certainly in a semi-niche audience for those who stick with it and play more than a few. Probably because people don't know how to really make them yet. I've been thinking up a list of guidelines on how to generally make a successful one but the problem is the more I think about it the more I'm convinced that a good lewd game isn't really a game. It's just a series of sex scenes with high levels of interactivity and diverse options. I mean unless you like pizza during sex I don't see why people would like to be challenged by the game while they're jacking off.

From my experience the games that do better are either really slow in their gameplay elements so you don't get burned out before sex happens (like an economy simulator or something similar) or they forego gameplay challenge entirely and just make sure you that can dress up and move your waifu in as many ways as possible so the entertainment factor never gets boring. Or maybe I'm just speaking to much for myself here. I just can't imagine why somebody would want to play tetris or something challenging while fucking a girl. It's like how VN's are "technically" games because they have elements in them that have nothing to do with being a VN and there's certain branches that lead to fail states sometimes in dialog. Either way If I ever make a lewd game I'm throwing the game design manuel out the window.

>>13725655

I worked (and am still kind of working) on a porn RPG. Really the only way to make an actually good porn game that is still a game is removing all action, adding a bunch of player interaction, and letting the player make their own story by giving them choices and multiple dialogues.

In a lot of ways Bethesda perfected most of the formula that is perfect for porn games, except they don't use it for porn at all.

>>13723552

Sony already said that PSVR sold well over 1 million unit, neither Vive or oculus disclosed their sales figure probably because it sold badly, e.g: Xbone, Ouya. I dont want to defend sony but to deny that PSVR is actually doing well compared to vive or oculus is just pure denial. Sure the spec aren't so great but that's not what OP is arguing about. Oculus have like what? 2 years headstart on the VR race but somehow fall behind a weaker competitor.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/charliefink/2017/08/29/sony-psvr-answers-vive-rift-price-cuts/#2e2c91147e25

>>13725762

>In a lot of ways Bethesda perfected most of the formula that is perfect for porn games,

<shitty writing hamfisted in to get to the "action"

<simplified an dumbed down fetch quests that usually lead to a "reward" at the end

<insane amount of customization in clothing

<horrible fucking gameplay

<completely random situations coming out of nowhere making a lewd sex scene out of something that really shouldn't occur

Sounds like porn to me really. There's a reason I mod the fuck out of Oblivion/Skyrim despite both games being shit.

He's not entirely wrong on this front. But it's only because mods and the like push the game into being semi-porn worthy. Still a faggot though.

>>13725807

>Its sold in fucking bundles with the PS4

No its not you fucking retard, do you even read the article you posted? Theres no PS4+PSVR bundle you dumbass.

>>13725838

does the ps4 vr headset work on PC?

What is it with sony related threads that turn to shit? It's so much easier to just ignore threads you don't like.

>>13726158

no, at least not yet.

>>13723561

>>13724065

Hey feggits. We don't listen and believe here. See >>13725761 for how to not be braindead. Now it's time you go back.

.

>>13726158

It works by emulating a Vive, but you need to make a converter for the USB cable and positional tracking does not work, only the display and rotation.

>>13726247

But, will it be enough or even matter?

>>13725827

The difference is that actual porn at least has a payoff where Beth games don't.

>>13723535

No subs and EN VA is a heavy obnoxious valley girl accent that sounds way older than the character and there's tons of dated memes shoved in the translation. There, I just saved you a few hundred bucks if you ever decided it might be worth it.

>>13726247

It's basically a mobile Vr, wouldn't get too excited.

>>13726189

By chan rules:

Sony = The Devil

Nintendo = The atom in the molecule in cells in the skin in the tip of the finger of God.

Microsoft = Error: File Not Found

>>13726298

>chan rules

Go and stay go. Not wrong about Nintendo though.

>>13726325

interesting

>>13726298

missing the big one here tbh

>>13726258

>>13726325

sounds like "yes" but its not really supported.

>>13726348

…Sega?

>>13726384

majority of posters/threads are focused on this one platform

>>13726345

>Not wrong about Nintendo though.

kek

Tell me more about the company that nostalgiafags refer to as "saving the video game industry" back in the 80s (even though the crash of '83 only affected Burgerland while Europe + Japan were doing just fine).

Tell me more about this fine company that almost put Namco out of business.

Tell me about their "not-at-all" draconian policy that forced 3rd party pubs to ONLY make games for the NES back in the day.

Tell me of how their assbackwards approach to hardware and online is somehow acceptable by legions of console cucks.

As far as we know, the motto is always is "It's OK when Nintendo does it, so fuck you."

>>13726419

The fuck is an Ouya.

>>13726440

Exactly.

>>13726428

Space like reddit elsewhere and get some reading comprehension.

>>13726445

Exactly.

is the site fucking up or something?

>>13726428

Have you seen any thread about BOTW or Odyssey?

It's impossible to talk about anything on /v/ without getting shitposted to death unless you talk about one of the 10 classics approved by /v/

>inb4 someone responds that /v/ isn't one person, essentially confirming that /v/ is one person and it's really easy to predict

>>13726463

The threads on BoTW go to shit because they're bad games. It's a simple matter of faggots not getting over this that prohibits the threads to have any discussion.

>>13726481

lots of people talk about bad games all the time, i dont care, if anything i make my own threads about games i want to talk about personally.

no reason to shit up a thread just because it bothers you. just encourages infighting between two separate groups.

>>13726351

In any case, don't buy psvr

>>13726497

Overwatch never had generals without shitposters. Undertale was forced into the state it is currently, and splatoon is fine.

>>13726463

BoTW is the most overpraised Zelda game since Twilight Princess (yeah, TP is a boring rehash. Shoot me.)

Odyssey is better than 3D World by leaps and bounds and slightly better than Sunshine, but it's NOT the best Mario game. Placing it above Super Mario World and Galaxy is sheer lunacy.

>>13726463

Which version of /v/, though? 8chan's or halfchan's?

Because as far as I know, halfchan's /v/ is filled to the brim with shills and cucks.

>>13726525

Nigger how does this even have to do with anything? Does them not being the best games of all time mean that the threads to talk about them NEED to be shitposted and saged to death?

I don't care if they're the best or not, I just want to talk about games.

>>13726481

And this is what the terrible moderation this place has been under has led to. People that firmly believe that anything that is disliked by themselves cannot be talked about by anyone.

Thanks for making /v/ an echo chamber

>>13726497

>Overwatch had generals at launch with little shitposting

No they didn't. And we stopped having threads because the only people who enjoyed it were mentally challenged and suicidal. If you havn't gone over those threads don't post about them.

>Undertale had generals for half a year with little shitposting

The demo did on halfchan .The base game had discussion threads for no more than 2 weeks before people started to rightly critasize it. Those first 2 weeks were largely elongated because of the red herring easter eggs.

>Splatoon still has a general

It's also full of faggots who want to pay online subscriptions and "tolerate" one of the most pozzed communities out there. The only reason they're tolerated is because Mark owns a Switch and because squid loli memes. The actual gameplay is nothing special and not worth the price of a console.

>b-but BotW is b-bad, guyse!!

Because it fundamentally is. If you want to know why stop being a manchild and learn how to view things objectively.

>where do you draw the line

When people become so obsessed with a franchise or company they lose site of basic facts. Simple.

>>13726505

>i dont care, if anything i make my own threads about games i want to talk about personally.

I bet you didn't care when Undertale furfags started leaking into other threads as well? Generals like those stop being about the game after a month at most.

>no reason to shit up a thread just because it bothers you. just encourages infighting between two separate groups.

Theres a difference between shitting up a thread and pointing out objective flaws while faggots bang their head on the floor and scream that they're wrong with no facts. it may surprise you to know this but people who post on one thread tend to post on another. /v/ isn't full of separate niche groups. There's not enough people here for that and part of the reason faggots tell people to lurk more is so they know how to keep the community on the right track from the shit normalfags eat up today.

>>13726556

8chan's.

This /v/ is still better, but that's not saying much since the other one is just a festering pozhole.

>>13726562

>People that firmly believe that anything that is disliked by themselves cannot be talked about by anyone

Nobody really believes this. You can discuss a game. Just don't lie and say it's a product that should be purchased when it's clearly not. Nintendo treads go to shit because it's full of people who think a bad game is good. And when people point that out it turns into a bitch fit where the Nintards are only capable of using "fun" as an argument.

>Thanks for making /v/ an echo chamber

There's a difference between an echochamber and telling a group of fanatics that they're wrong.

>unlike both other competitors.

yeah that's because they are not game companies they are hardware companies you fucking moron.

>>13723519

Now, where are the killer apps that are suppose to come out and drive people to buy more Playstation VR? Most companies have dropped support. I think the only things people may be looking forward to for 2017 is The Inpatient and No Heroes Allowed!

>>13726562

Nothing, really.

>>13726481

As a standard open world game, it's fine.

As a ZELDA game, though….yeesh.

>>13726564

>Generals like those stop being about the game after a month at most.

I oppose generals as a general rule, never liked them back when pokefags forced them way back in like 09. Imageboards were always at their best when someone mentions a topic and the thread flows naturally rather than having a thread to gather people looking to discuss that one thing in particular. I think one is a way of manufacturing discussion artificially and elongating it unnecessarily and ultimately building incestuous communities within communities that have nothing to add. sort of the problem with gamergate threads.

>>13723664

This. I don't what you're fucking peripheral is or if it's better than other peripherals of the same kind. The question is whether or not there are good games that require the peripheral.

>>13726591

It's amazing to me that someone can't understand that not everybody likes the same things. BOTW isn't objectively bad, neither is Odyssey.

I don't know when this happened but a bad game is a completely broken game.

A bad game is something that barely holds together, a game that any of its aspects so completely non functional that is becomes completely unplayable. Story, Graphics, Gameplay, Audio, whatever you want.

Nothing that's come out of Nintendo has been any of these, except maybe the new Pokemon games.

I'm sorry you dislike these games, but they're not objectively bad. If you don't wanna buy it, then cool, but people like them and they will suggest to other like minded people to also buy them. Please, for the love of Christ, behave like a fucking adult

>>13726613

>As a standard open world game, it's fine.

Yea so is Skyrim :^)

You got swept up by the good looking aesthetics and don't mind your time being wasted on a time sink. Just admit it.

>>13726618

More or less yea. If mods made new games a cyclical thread more often this wouldn't be as much of an issue. On that same hand though the industry has changed a lot since 07. With all the remakes and stuff it's hard not to have a thread on a game without it being somewhat of a general.

>BOTW isn't objectively bad, neither is Odyssey.

lol

>I don't know when this happened but a bad game is a completely broken game

It's still a bad game. Not worth money.

>Nothing that's come out of Nintendo has been any of these, except maybe the new Pokemon games.

Except they are? If you want to discuss what makes BoTW not function very well as a game make a thread on it and people will tell you. It's a time sink grinding game with not much going for it outside of a big world where you can do fuck all in.

>I'm sorry you dislike these games, but they're not objectively bad. If you don't wanna buy it, then cool, but people like them and they will suggest to other like minded people to also buy them. Please, for the love of Christ, behave like a fucking adult

>says the guy who can't confront the reality of a product being bad

BoTW is bad. The mechanics are fundementally fucked and you need to be retarded to look past them. If you want to have a thread on the game make one. And then people will tell you exactly what's wrong with it and you'll bitch that the thread was "derailed" when in reality you should have been making this topic on another site like reddit or cuckchan. Asking a group of people who know what they're talking about on a given topic to "grow up" is probably one of the most juvenile things you can do. And it's almost always coming from a person who owns a Switch.

>>13726689

Second greentext and on meant for >>13726640

My bad.

>>13723519

Hi NeoGAF, still looking for a new home?

>>13725177

>He

>Implying that's not a femdola

She has her senpai help her.

>>13726689

I made a sotc thread recently just comparing a few shots from the original and the new one. I usually start my OPs with questions and return to the questions at the end of the OP and find that discussion is pretty healthy. The thread went from discussing visual changes to people who have heard about the game, never played it, anxiety about whether or not it still holds up, and positive affirmation that it still has done things that haven't been surpassed and are absolutely worth experiencing.

It's natural. When you have a general that is made infinitely and forever, you can't squeeze discussion out of nothing. There has to be an idea to get it started. I find one of the best ways to make fun discussion is to bring up an iconic moment or something from a game, and when people chime in sharing their experiences it naturally flows into something very enjoyable. Makes me want to create an FF7 thread. If you see one pop up, it might be mine.

>>13726689

>>13726698

I'm honestly unsure if you're just fucking with me because if you believe anything in BOTW is broken then you might actually be fucking retarded.

Again, I understand you subjectively dislike it, that doesn't mean it's objectively bad.

Botw is bad, its better than the other zelda games in the fact that its open world and you can rock climb and shit but on the other hand it does literally every other thing bad. they just put a zelda skin over it and added some shitty zelda backstory to say look this is a zelda game.

>>13726640

>Muh Godtendo's never made a bad game.

Star Fox Zero? Adventures? Assault? Triforce Heroes? Wii Music? Animal Crossing Amiibo Festival? Super Mario Run? Doshin the Giant? That's just a few, BTW.

>>13726689

At least BoTW doesn't have a monumental amount of glitches, but it is indeed the "Skyrim" of the Zelda franchise in most ways than one.

>>13726716

>if you believe anything in BOTW is broken then you might actually be fucking retarded.

Spoken like a true fanboy. If you want to discuss this in detail make a thread on it. But for simple kicks I can mention how you will never die in the game because of the broken food system. You ave to physically limit yourself if you want to make the combat even function.

>Again, I understand you subjectively dislike it, that doesn't mean it's objectively bad.

I bet you're one of those fags who thinks "all art is subjective" despite the overwhelming majority of artists with a formal education who say otherwise. Eat shit.

>>13726737

>At least BoTW doesn't have a monumental amount of glitches

It's funny to because the glitches in Skyrim is one of the most memorable things about it.

>>13726737

Nintendo have always been jews aswell since the NES even till today. Look at youtube no one can post a nintendo gameplay without being sued or nintendo wanting a large cut.

>>13726737

Sorry, should've probably added "nothing recent" and "out of their big titles".

>zero

>triforce

Mediocre yeah, bad nah. The rest is pretty shit.

>>13726753

I already discussed this way too many times, honestly it's a huge waste of time to discuss something with someone that refuses to even admit that his opinions are incredibly subjective.

You're already calling me a fanboy and using ad hominems, I'd rather let you believe you're right and just drop it here.

>>13726776

There's a huge difference between an opinion and a fact.

You can have an opinion that the cracks in your home foundation is fine, but the fact is it's going to crumble one day if you dont do something about it.

>>13726776

>I already discussed this way too many times, honestly it's a huge waste of time to discuss something with someone that refuses to even admit that his opinions are incredibly subjective.

More like you got BTFO to many times and the only corner you can defend is how subjective opinions are.

>You're already calling me a fanboy and using ad hominems

It's not my fault that people who appreciate a bad product always grasp for the same straws that relinquish any form of an argument or debate. If you want to defend your game I already told you that you can by making a thread about it. Fuck off though OP. You've been nailed as a retard and people aren't going to magically think your statements are correct if you don't back them up with solid facts.

>>13726787

I agree.

>>13726814

Anon I'm not going to debate you.

You won this one, you can write it down in your arguments diary.

>>13726817

So you'll stop bitching that Nintendo threads go to shit because of "evulll contrarians"? Because nothing's been solved here obviously.

>>13726827

No, I'll still do it.

>>13726839

Then continue having history repeat itself just like this thread.

>>13724477

>Fuuuck

You have to go back.

>>13726776

How about Other M? Federation Force? Sticker Star? Color Splash? Hey you, Pikachu? Urban Champion? Mario is Missing? Every Mario Party game after 4? Mario Tennis: Ultra Smash? Stack Up? Star Fox Command? Pokemon Snap? Pokemon Conquest? Wii Play? Super Princess Peach? Wrecking Crew? Pokemon Channel?

>>13726864

The ONLY saving grace in an otherwise banal game.

>>13727021

You're too close from the next gen to invest now: Buy used, cuckulus sells for 250 euros now.

>>13723534

>Just look at the support they're giving it versus what Oculus and Vive have been doing.

Just look at the support they gave the Vita versus what the Wii U was doing

enjoy your leased hardware

>>13723536

SteamVR installation is tied to steam, but I have been able to run some games like CM3D2 on Vive without steam running in the background after it was installed.

Not sure how one would go about installing steamVR without steam initially.

OSVR is always an option, but content would be far more limited.

>>13725389

>VR headsets are exclusively for porn

Bullshit, I play more games on it than porn. The games I frequent might not be mindblowingly spectacular but they are still enjoyable every now and then despite some being made on a shoestring budget.

my favourites so far:

>H3VR (reasonably mechanically accurate shooting range sim)

>il2 Bos (ww2 flightsim without motion controller support, need hotas)

>VTOLVR (flightsim with motion controller support)

>iron wolf (submarine sim)

I'd like to see more sims with interactive cockpits using motion controllers.

Some of the competitive online shooters I've tried so far were rather boring.

Need something that takes more advantage of motion tracking besides peeking from cover like interacting with equipment such as mortars, AT guns, crew member of tanks/boats/aircraft.

Combined arms MMO similar to planetside 1 would be really nice but there aren't enough HMDs out there to justify the cost of making one.

Hopefully once the tech becomes cheaper and more accessible to the masses.

I don't know if any of what you said is true, but there is no way a console can support as many games as the PC market has.

Maybe Playstation has a few good games in VR but that's all it ever will have, a few.