[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/uf0/ - UFOs and Ayylmaos

UFOs, Ayys, Antarctica, DUMBs, Chemtrails

Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


File: 8556daa9ea4f24f⋯.jpg (313.01 KB,1832x1080,229:135,unidentifiedaircraft.jpg)

 No.59

What's this?

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.63

File: 245349946b9ace5⋯.png (91.65 KB,1024x527,1024:527,Screenshot_from_2020_12_16….png)

>>59

What is the picture's back story? It is pretty low rez tbh. Where did you get it? I would file this under "needs more info' at this point.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.64

File: c7c5de7dfd53930⋯.png (123.64 KB,475x283,475:283,whoub_d.png)

>>63

I got it from here

https://m.imgur.com/whoub

It's a webp image. It's possible to download a different format by clicking on 'view image' and changing webp in the URL to PNG or JPG. I think the site converts images to webp, which would likely delete EXIF data.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.65

>>64

Did that and PNG has the same lack of exif.

JUne 19 2012 and only 18 views. That is the thing that stands out the most to me. Wherever this came from it just sat there a very long time before coming to your attention. Its a thing but what thing it is is tough to tell. Are there more of the same scene somewhere? Were you just searching for UFO?

Ever look through the eohGG drop? Its a pain in the ass but it is a fun dig.

http://archive.is/eohGG

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.66

>>65

Imgur is an image hosting service that’s very popular with Reddit. It’s possible that the image was shown on a Reddit post, but reverse searching found no results, and I’d expect a web crawler to pick it up if the link was posted on Reddit.

Furthermore, Imgur isn’t just used for Reddit. In 2012, I’m not sure if direct image transfer was as accessible as it is now, like through email and chat apps like Discord. I’ve come across many images that were obviously not meant to be shared with anyone else.

Unfortunately, I only have this image. I posted it because I’m not knowledgeable enough about aircraft to know if it’s a UFO or something else.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.67

File: 5db4491c62eba8b⋯.png (158.35 KB,911x949,911:949,Screenshot_from_2020_12_17….png)

File: 408ba5fef61eb30⋯.jpg (38.59 KB,792x498,132:83,408ba5fef61eb3090daf279b1c….jpg)

File: c7fd1437555dcda⋯.png (291.51 KB,978x979,978:979,Screenshot_from_2020_12_17….png)

File: 1c5e0a58f409d32⋯.png (170.2 KB,958x949,958:949,Screenshot_from_2020_12_17….png)

>>66

This (probably chink) website shows various features of the pictures. I dont have a strong understanding of what it means but I KNOW the photo here that I analyzed is a fake because the exif data shows Photoshop as the creation source. Sloppy if anyone is actually trying to pass it as real.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.68

>>67

I checked the aspect ratio, with is 5:3.

Wikipedia says:

1.6:1 (5:3)

A common European widescreen standard; Paramount format;[1] native Super 16 mm film

European widescreen format was a 5:3 (15:9) resolution of 800x480 and 1280x768 with progressive scan. Developed in 1969 by Rune Ericson, Super 16 mm was widely used in Europe, before the move to 16:9.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]