/thedonald/ ---- HOW Soros CAN RIG THE ELECTORAL VOTES ---

Name
Email
Subject	REC STOP
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
Password	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive	Archive [500 char limit]
* = required field	[▶Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Hide country (this board displays your country when you post if this is unchecked)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf Max filesize is16 MB. Max image dimensions are15000 x15000. You may upload1 per post.

File: ffdc60c64d635bd⋯.jpeg (385.35 KB,1940x1294,970:647,George-Soros-1940x1294.jpeg)

--- HOW Soros CAN RIG THE ELECTORAL VOTES --- Anonymous 11/13/16 (Sun) 21:06:44 No.5

(((They))) will instruct electoral voters to vote Hillary or other republican candidates.

(1). Why must the electoral voters follow (((their))) instructions?

(((They))) are the big potatoes. Electoral voters are mostly politicians, or people wish to pursue a politician career. If not following (((their))) instructions, electoral voters will ruin their own political career and face a much tougher future. However, if following (((their))) instructions, electoral voters will have a bright future (as guaranteed by (((them)))), money, and (((networking))) – that is exactly a politician wants for his/her own future. On the other hand, if Trump gets elected, electors might have to work hard for a better politician career, this is much worse than the future guaranteed future by (((them))). That is, if electors follow (((their))) instructions, the electors will become part of the establishment, and the establishment system gets the electors covered – again, that is, a risk-free, bright politician future (for electors) without having to work hard.

(2). But electors are chosen by the republican party, that means they must be loyal, isn't it?

Well, no, not to Trump. GOP hates Trump. Remember Trump said that he something bad will happen if he did not get the republican nomination? Remember republicans called for trump's drop out for the presidential race? Remember so many republicans, one by one, said he/she will not support trump anymore? Remember GOP got divided when it came to Trump? They don't want to see trump gets elected, especially considering what they did or said about trump (betrayal, unloyal, Bush et al. even supported Hillary). That's it. Many electors will vote Hillary instead as Hillary is the NEO-CON ("true republican value"). While it might be improper for republican electors to vote Hillary, they can vote for another republican other than trump. And this is what (((they))) want – indeed, this will make Hillary president, and it is hard to tell it's rigged because many electors did NOT vote Hillary - they voted another republican, just not Trump. If this shows something, it only means that nobody likes Trump. Hence by doing this, Trump's votes decreases, and eventually lower than Hillary's. If eventually the house of representatives or Congress has to decide, Hillary will get elected since it's determined by (((system))), also because of reason (4).

(3). How are they going to rig the electoral votes?

Many ways. But they need to consider mainly two factors:

(3-i). Is it easy to rig? (force a recount, change the results, add duplicates votes or add votes from non-existed people, etc.)

(3-ii). How many electoral votes they can rig for each red state? (=actual electoral votes number - number of electoral votes they can make faithless)

____________________________

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 11/13/16 (Sun) 21:07:06 No.6

(4). Does it sound legitimate if (((they))) rigged the system?

Of course, it will sound legitimate. Since:

(4-i). Hillary wins popular votes

(4-ii). Hillary calls for strong together, Trump divided the country. Look at the riots.

(4-iii). Indeed, there has never been a time faithless electors change the result, but there has never been a president like Donald Trump.

(4-iv). Trump is untrustworthy: sexual assaults, trump university, tax record(might be his lie, should be investigated), etc. Trump is unfit to be president.

(4-v). Continued from above point, Trump is a liar. Note that Trump always claim the system is rigged. Could it be Trump rigging the system? Let's investigate and recount the votes, and it will turn out to be a Hillary's victory.

(4-vi). The BIG online petition calling for faithless electors.

(5). Why don't (((they))) just use trump.

Trump represents his antisemitic supporters. Defeat trump is like beat his supporters in the face.

Even if Trump bend-over to (((them))), Trump is unstable and unpredictable, while Hillary is power-hungry hence better. (((They))) want power-hungry president. The more power-hungry one is, the easier and more stable they can apply control over one. Plus Hillary has a lot of "experience" following (((their))) order…

(6). Does it really have to be Hillary?

Not necessary. But (((they))) PROMISED THE PRESIDENCY for Hillary Clinton at BILDERBERG so that it might damage (((their image))) if Hillary does not get elected - considering that Bilderberg connects (((them))) to their puppet good goyim.

On the other hand, if both Hillary and Trump lost majority electoral votes, they can appoint Bernie Sanders. It will make most people happy, considering that the support for both Hillary and Trump is low.

(7). There will be civil war if trump loses.

First, a civil war might be (((their))) real purpose. Especially considering they bought weapon recently. A civil war can totally change things and destroy whites. And it will provide (((them))) legitimate reason to kill whites - given that whites start the civil war for the election of Hillary.

If whites do not start a civil war when Hillary gets elected, then it means whites will do nothing when they push thing down white people's throat.

So what do you think regarding this? Anything to add?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Anonymous 11/13/16 (Sun) 21:07:38 No.7

PS:

This is a neural analysis, I want to hear what you think of this. Can it happen?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.