[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / doomer / flutter / jenny / lewd / rwby / tf / tulpa / vietnam ][Options][ watchlist ]

/tech/ - Technology

You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Email
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

[–]

 No.992938>>993164 >>993171 >>993364 >>993626 >>993853 >>993891 >>994664 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

There are a bunch of alternatives for Github all of a sudden. Which one is best?

Gogs:

>the "original" github clone, lightweight, runs as a docker image from any computer, <50mb memory

>Free

>has a lot of good reviews

>but according to internet research the maintainer is unreliable as fuck

Gitea:

>A Gogs fork made because the Gogs maintainer apparently left for a month without notice

>Fork apparently caused a lot of drama and confusion

>Dumb name

>But the development looks much more active than Gogs

>Pretty sure most of the Gogs developers moved here

Gitlab:

>Huge bloatware piece of shit but apparently very good and useful

>Requires 8 gigs of RAM

>Free hosted private repositories

>No pull requests on the free tier even if you're self-hosting (wtf is this kikery?)

Bitbucket:

>Free hosted private repositories

>$10 one time fee to self host

>Kinda decent as in it works but the UI has always been complete garbage

>made by Asslassian, nothing more needs to be said

AWS CodeCommit:

>Muh amazon

>Muh AWS

>Muh Cloud

>Muh no features at all

I've pretty much narrowed it down to Gogs or Gitea, leaning towards Gitea. but if anyone has any reasons why not to use it, post them. Also "just use git" isn't an option.

 No.992952

I'm leaning towards Gitea myself.

Should run on the spare i3 box and in general have active development.


 No.992954>>992955 >>995549

What about cgit and a mailing list? Keeps away the babby ducks.


 No.992955>>992966

>>992954

>self-hosted

>want to exclude babby

how about fossil then

wiki, forum, ticket system, version control, and you can host it anywhere on almost no resources. Got some random shared hosting account? Host five or ten fossil repos there.


 No.992957

Gitweb, maybe Gerrit


 No.992966

>>992955

/tech/notes is quite an interesting concept. I like it.


 No.993163>>993165

sr.ht


 No.993164>>993187

>>992938 (OP)

>Gitlab:

>>No pull requests on the free tier even if you're self-hosting (wtf is this kikery?)

https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/index.html

>Also "just use git" isn't an option.

faggot


 No.993165

>>993163

This! It's invite only for now, but Drew will probably invite pretty much anyone if you ask him. Or just self host.


 No.993171>>993175 >>993186

File (hide): 7171aced6124fa5⋯.png (27.46 KB, 403x521, 403:521, tiered pricing.PNG) (h) (u)

>>992938 (OP)

>Bitbucket:

>>Free hosted private repositories

>>$10 one time fee to self host

LMFAO I WISH


 No.993175

>>993171

nigger you aren't doing that right


 No.993185>>993189

Why has no-one mentioned notabug.org?


 No.993186

>>993171

not defending atlassian's shit pricing but if you're one person it is only $10.


 No.993187>>993189

>>993164

Yeah, and you don't get them unless you pay. Doesn't make any sense.


 No.993189>>993209

>>993185

Because you can't read

>>993187

wrong


 No.993209>>993211

>>993189

Could you explain this then please? I'm confused why you're saying merge requests are available for free, when it's clearly listed on their pricing page otherwise.


 No.993211

>>993209

I see. "Approvals" are something else. That wording is still confusing to brainlets such as myself.


 No.993364>>993515 >>993889

>>992938 (OP)

>GitLab:

>>Requires 8 gigs of RAM

>No pull requests on the free tier even if you're self-hosting

Just made a pull request on my gitlab install that only uses 2gb of memory, fuck off with your FUD kike.


 No.993515>>993516

>>993364

>only 2gb of memory


 No.993516

>>993515

I checked before I posted, I'll take 2gb over Go trash anyday


 No.993518

>ill take ruby trash over go trash

you're the one wasting money on ram i guess


 No.993626>>993632

>>992938 (OP)

>it should do

what kind of shit language is that?


 No.993632>>993638

>>993626

American English.


 No.993638

>>993632

hardiharrharr, i meant programming language you funny fuck


 No.993853

>>992938 (OP)

>Also "just use git" isn't an option.

Why not? Do you not have access to the filesystem?


ssh [hostname] git init --bare /remote/repo/path
git remote add [remote-name] [hostname]:/remote/repo/path
git push [remote-name] master


 No.993862>>993873

File (hide): 5e625fa22048994⋯.jpeg (144.66 KB, 1551x1271, 1551:1271, gitgud.jpeg) (h) (u)

>ctrl-f gitgud

>0 matches


 No.993873>>993875

>>993862

>gitgud

Last I checked, you had to login just to browse repos. Is that still the case?


 No.993875>>993883 >>994120


 No.993883>>995511

>>993875

first page

>sissy-university

nop nop nop


 No.993889

>>993364

It may run with only 2 gigs, but it will be slow as fuck.


 No.993891

>>992938 (OP)

>Also "just use git" isn't an option.

How about a mailing list?


 No.994003>>994667

What good are all these hubsites? I don't even understand it.


 No.994014

One of them needs javascript just to download the files lmao


 No.994120

>>993875

Glad to hear it's finally usable. Will be hosting my open sores there instead of github for sure.


 No.994664

>>992938 (OP)

>not using git's builtin gitweb


 No.994667

>>994003

The core feature is "Pull Requests", as Github calls it. It's an easy way to request, review and comment on merges. Issue tracking is another feature. Pull Requests can be linked to Issues. More advanced "hubsites" offer integration into automated testing frameworks, which for example can run unit tests or detect spaghetti code, and indicate results on the pull request's page to make the reviewer's job easier.


 No.995511

>>993883

lol I remember hearing it got kicked off github


 No.995549>>995556

>>992954

cgit code quality sucks. Don't you remember that trivial vulnerability a couple months back? I agree with the idea of your post but would recommend stagit instead.


 No.995556

>>995549

Yeah, I considered that, but stagit doesn't make a RSS for commits.


 No.1003763

sadly gitlab is pro-SJW




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
39 replies | 3 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / doomer / flutter / jenny / lewd / rwby / tf / tulpa / vietnam ][ watchlist ]