/tech/ - Technology★

there used to be a groupbot what happened to that

>>992624

here's groupbot's tox ID:

56A1ADE4B65B86BCD51CC73E2CD4E542179F47959FE3E0E21B4B0ACDADE51855D34D34D37CB5

what's the point

there's no one to talk with

>>992642

me

Tox is full of pedos

>>992707

See this anime avatar fag for an example

0A323568AB15A8BACB72786B373B886382C1A658B2DDD53827EE8C5BFDBD3E2893A922EDAAAC

Hit me up buddy

>>992707

>add groupbot

>receive message from groupbot

>utox segfaults

https://github.com/uTox/uTox/issues/1206

<the absolute state of tox

>>992756

Utox is the shittiest client. No one uses it. Use qtox or toxic. I bet you are a windowsfag.

>>992756

>utox

Problem's right there. Everyone is talking about how much better Qtox is.

>>992761

>windows

no

>>992762

but utox is written in pure holy C and qtox is written in unholy C++

>>992766

That's how I know you're a larper. Head over to the fizzbuzz thread and learn something, kid.

Fuck off cianigger

>>992623 (OP)

>>992623 (OP)

>>992623 (OP)

>>992623 (OP)

>>992623 (OP)

>>992767

>bloat enthusiasts

i'm not going to have a choice even the git version has this same stupid fucking error and it's been raised an issue for 8 months. utox needs to get its shit together

>>992771

You're throwing around bloat too much. It's feature rich, sure. It's also quality. If features are well put in place and useful I don't have a problem, it's not over the top in Qtox.

>>992777

uTox vs qTox argument is also C vs C++ and gtk vs Qt

this is irrelevant though because uTox doesn't work

>>992778

Why hasn't everyone just accepted that TUI is best and switched to toxic already

>>992623 (OP)

When you find rudolph can you help me find recharged?

>>992879

Lol wtf

>>992782

Toxic doesn’t even run for me. I execute the run script and it just returns an error. Not sure why

>>992880

I made that a while ago. It took approximately 15 minutes.

Just go to https://toxme.io/ , click find friends, and you'll find sickfuckery fast, probably on the first page.

Interestingly enough, many of them appear to be German.

>>992903

Because they let pedos run rampant on the internet. There is no intention to do anything about them most of the time.

>>992903

Privacy is a one way street faggot its either everyone is allowed or no one is

>>992769

not cia, trust me

>>992783

OP here, am recharged, add me faggot

>>992903

because the userbase was sourced from imageboards

>>993128

Wasn't the development team itself sourced from imageboards?

>>993078

Almost all pedo related actions on the internet are done on the clearnet on normalfag websites and applications like facebook and "KiK". Fuck even jewtube is plastered in borderline CP. If every man who tried to solicit pictures from underage girls or who watched CP over the clearnet actively was imprisoned you'd have 10's of millions of people in prison. Millions and millions of views on videos of girls doing gymnastics and shit with a fuckton of disgusting comments below and nothing was done about it for years. Pedophilia is all but completely normalized in the west, everyone just likes to pretend that 12 year olds wearing miniskirts and having their faces caked in makeup like a street walker is perfectly normal.

The number of pedophiles trading and scheming on a given service never changes. It's just the number of normalfags obfuscating them lowering that makes them more obvious.

>>992903

>>992879

Most obvious tryhard glownigger shit I've ever seen. They've been doing it since 2013. On the rare occasion an actual pedo shows up in cyberia he usually just gets mad, gorbles in poolang, and leaves because no one will add him

>>993329

The proportion of pedos then?

>>992879

>>992882

>>992903

>Using toxme.io to

What stops others from registering someone else's ID on a service like that?

>>993351

The fear of someone else doing it driving them to do it first.

>>993347

The point is that pedos are fucking retarded and use whatever they can to access the material. If there is even perceived privacy they flock to something regardless of how private it actually is. The idea that pedos are somehow smart and try to hide their deviancy is wrong. The average pedo is literally braindead, as the average person is literally braindead.

>>993347

>>993420

Pedos are like the Canary in the Coal Mine. You know there's a problem (with privacy/security) when they keel over dead (get v&).

>>993657

That's not even true. There are just bad practices that they can get caught for because they're retarded.

Isn't Tox dead? Or is it still updated? Rumor had it that Tox was useless because its privacy/security was compromised.

>>998739

Yes, there are still critical vulnerabilities in Tox. I don't know why this thread exists.

>>998827

Source or fuck off

>>993420

>The average pedo is literally braindead

I've read studies to this effect, indicating that paedophiles have an on-average, lower IQ. I can't stop myself from wondering if we're only catching the stupid ones, and that this skews the perception of their intelligence, and puts us on a poorer footing to deal with them effectively.

>>998830

>leaks your IP

>https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/issues/426

Why would you ever use a program created by /g/?

>>999326

Fundamental problem of with the class of encryption. If you fix it you lose deniability. Which means if you private key was stolen every message you have ever sent could be proven as having come from you. This is a feature of tox. Only retards that don't understand crypto shill this.

>>999333

>Fundamental problem of with the class of encryption.

wrong

>>999349

Name a single example that is deniable and does not have some other far worse fault. Pro tip you can't because you are a larping faggot.

>>999350

>what is burden of proof

LARPer spotted

>>999360

Every single time some faggot links to that thread, and every single time you faggots can never list a counter example. Fuck off CIA shill.

>>999362

every single time some faggot mentions that insecure chat program, and every single time you faggots claim that protection against KCI and deniability are mutually exclusive. Fuck off CIA shill.

>>999360

>this is a criminal trial

Seriously, just tell us which chat protocol to use instead

>protip: you cant

>>999393

>this isn't a criminal trial so i can just claim whatever and it's on other to disprove me

no

>Seriously, just tell us which chat protocol to use instead

signal

>>999419

Which is vulnerable to KCi you retard.

http://prosecco.gforge.inria.fr/personal/bblanche/publications/KobeissiBhargavanBlanchetEuroSP17.pdf

Just like every single deniable protocol

>>999503

This PDF doesn't say that Signal is vulnerable to KCI though.

>>999563

It literally does

>>999564

>We demonstrate our methodology by implementing and

>analyzing a variant of the popular Signal Protocol with only

>minor differences.

Try again.

>>999566

>only minor differences

>minor

try again

>>999579

>minor differences

This means it isn't the Signal protocol anymore. try again

>>999584

>He thinks minor means adding cryptographic vulnerabilities

You are aa retard

>>999584

>Change motd in openbsd

<Sorry fam not openbsd anymore!

>>999587

>he thinks mutating cryptographic algorithms won't change its properties

I'm done arguing with this level of retardation.

>>999590

>He thinks any protocol change is always a cryptographic one

Okay Anon. What specifically did they change to break everything? Pro tip shill nothing related.

Where'd all you retards go

>>993329

I doubt pedophilia is any more common in the west than it is anywhere else. E.g. in the muslim world women are subhuman (hence rape isn't that bad and surprise its easiest to rape a child). And only a (possibly latent) pedophile would watch anime.

Why use tox when there's xmpp?

The latter doesn't disclose your IP even if you don't use tor and supports offline messages

>>1008001

XMPP is server based, your server will know your IP. Tox was designed to be P2P with no server necessary. I don't understand how it's possible to connect through a P2P protocol without knowledge of the specific IP address of each peer.

>>1008017

>XMPP is server based, your server will know your IP.

Yeah it will, but at least it won't disclose your IP to every single person you connect to. Also, there's nothing preventing your from using tor and shit

>Tox was designed to be P2P with no server necessary.

Why make that the goal? I don't see how being p2p is of any value unto itself. And yeah, you still need bootstrap servers

>I don't understand how it's possible to connect through a P2P protocol without knowledge of the specific IP address of each peer.

Well, i2p (as well as freenet, I guess lokinet and some other networks) is p2p and you don't get to know IPs of the people you talk to. Actually, if somebody were to make an alternative to tox making use of i2p, that'd be a lot easier and more secure, since besides anonymity i2p would also provide routing and encryption.

>>1007995

CP is the gold standard for encryption and anonymity. If the standard is any good, it should be swarmed by the dregs of society looking for safety. Dont fight it, they are the canary in the coal mine.

>>1008029

> I don't see how being p2p is of any value unto itself.

Servers are single points of failure that can be abandoned, shut down, or raided.

>bootstrap servers

Bootstrap nodes, that are plentiful, can be run by anyone, and are automatically discovered and added. Additionally, you save peers after every successful connection to use as bootstrap nodes the next time.

>i2p (as well as freenet, I guess lokinet and some other networks) is p2p and you don't get to know IPs of the people you talk to

Tox lets Tor handle anonymization, because Tor has a longer and better track record at it, so Tox can focus on doing what Tox does. I2P transport support via proxies, similar to the way Tor support works, was being worked on last time I looked into it.

>>1008094

This anon is correct. Paedophiles are canaries. If your network is worth using, it should be able to protect terrorists and pedophiles, society's most wanted. Encryption is fundamentally non-discriminating. Anything capable of denying service can be turned against you, and eventually will be.

>>1008094

The problem with this is that the presence of CP is what prompts the glowniggers to come and find ways to de-anonymize your network. If your canary is what's causing the toxic gases to seep out of the mine, you're probably safer without it.

>>1008241

Pedos don't cause the network to become insecure (unless you're talking inserting backdoors into the codebase), the network was always insecure and glowniggers just expose it. You're not advocating for security by obscurity, are you anon?

i swear, i've been seing these Tox threads on /g/ and /tech/ since 2013. Is it still an unusable piece of shit?

lately, i've been using signal, it's nice except for having phone number + pin instead of username and password (which is completely retarded)

>>1008863

It's a lot better than what it was, but still not perfect, and I'm pretty sure it's stagnated now.

>>1008866

i think this goes to show you should never beta before you're ready to, as it will kill your product's reputation.

>>1008869

Well one of the developers made off with the domain/donations for ever ago, that's what killed the project.

>>992623 (OP)

isn't Tox ded? and imageboards are the better form of communication.

>>992708

anime can't be pedo. it's back to >>>/reddit/ for u

>>1008871

>>1008869

>>1008866

>>1008863

Tox died in 2013 and has been keeping it up ever since nigger

>>1008924

bait

most people use im on a fucking phone

tox can't support offline (p2p),so is fucking shit

>ios

apple doesn't allow background app network access,unusable trash

>android

drain battery and using a lot data

F9706A42721016DAC583592294E7FEF064689AD270D0788153433E8BB2D2BF625F4F7DF9B56B

>>1008207

>Servers are single points of failure that can be abandoned, shut down, or raided.

<tox uses centralized servers (bootstrap, dht)

>Bootstrap nodes, that are plentiful, can be run by anyone, and are automatically discovered and added.

>automatically discovered and added

<central servers

https://nodes.tox.chat

the point is tox is not fully p2p, it's decentralized, there is a difference.

there is a reason your not entering ip addresses when your connecting to people.

>>1009113

What is your definition of "full P2P"?

>>1009113

>centralized servers (bootstrap, dht)

This is literally the most bold-facedly retarded post I have ever seen on this website. This post is the most blatant example of down syndrome posting to ever compete in the window-licking cup. What the fuck, anon.

>Looking for Rudolph edition

I'm here. It's spelled Rudolf. I have my Tox profile on another computer which can't connect to the internet anymore. If I can transfer the profile to this one, I'll get on it and talk to my boys again.

So I guess lainbot is not coming back? What now? I told you guys to get on telegram.

>>992623 (OP)

Somebody needs to make some consensus system for chat logs, and make a nonautistic mobile client that only does TCP.

On another note Delta Chat is GOAT, doesnt reinvent the wheel and actually does what i want

There is still kalinabot

12EDB939AA529641CE53830B518D6EB30241868EE0E5023C46A372363CAEC91C

>>1013928

Here is the ID for the new lainbot, it was down only temporarily.

2167ED20D40E1A5557A7AEFE16D0E110920382A9F3AA6C6597EA71DF4E499C5942CD0768F260

>>1013903

You'll never be white.

FE35D4C55C4CB0E36BBE7009BA977463FCF0B0917583C9CEC57266B72AA7675EF6D1D0C02B1D

>>1013903

sup fag, it's recharged here. just add me already

Recharged here?

>>1013931 You "id" is not ID

12EDB939AA529641CE53830B518D6EB30241868EE0E5023C46A372363CAEC91C2C948AEFE4EB

why is tox such a piece of shit, and why are they not developing it anymore

>>1027935

Tox was updated a few months ago. You don't need to update a protocol. It's set in stone. You just need clients, which already exist and are updated every month.

>>1027990

>Tox was updated a few months ago.

Does it still leak your IP address?

Btw is Tox IPv6 ready?

>>1028012

>Does it still leak your IP address?

It never did

>>1028017

obvious lie

>>1028018

Show me proof of it leaking IP when you're using VPN/Tor.

>>1027990

>are updated every other month

lol?

I've been using utox for a year now and I haven't seen a single update

>>1028020

lol

>>1028030

What's funny?

>>1028026

>utox is tox

Stop confusing a messenger with a protocol. qTox got an update a few days ago.

>>1028032

>You just need clients, which already exist and are updated every month.

>qTox got an update a few days ago.

qtox isn't all the clients

>>1028039

uTox is still worked on from what I see since the last commit was made last week just like qTox. If you can't wait for someone to spoonfeed you with the latest release you can easily compile it yourself.

https://github.com/uTox/uTox/blob/develop/docs/BUILD.md

bump

>>993078

You know its secure when you can freely shitpost about shooting up a school and not get vanned within 24 hours.

>>1028012

>Btw is Tox IPv6 ready?

well?

826A588380707E434B2A015D314D55D39553745A687_B12B00E7CF82F92616F730FC0007C950C

(remove the _)

test

bububu

826A588380707E434B2A015D314D55D39553745A687_B12B00E7CF82F92616F730FC0007C950C

What about matrix / riot? any particular reason people choose tox over riot?

>>1031684

I've always been on tox, and I'll die on tox too. Never tried those others

Blackhats For Bitcoin - your number one darknet cybercrime solution. We are professional hackers offering our services, both blackhat and whitehat, for an affordable rate.

Website:

blackhatspfqdovh.onion

E-mail:

hireahacker@secmail.pro

>>1031684

Riot.im has built-in tracking.

Matrix is decentralized, it still relies on servers. Tox is distributed/peer-to-peer.

I'd say Matrix is probably better for large group chats, but Tox is definitely more secure and better for 1-1 chat/voip/video.

>>1031684

The Matrix project is filled with SJWs. Not saying that's a reason not to use it, but it's worth keeping it in mind if you do.

>>1032230

isnt tox just a phone app tho? i dont care about those things

>>1032247

No. Tox is a protocol. Trifa is an android IM using that protocol. qTox/uTox are the same shit just on desktop.

Why is tox no longer on the Ubuntu package repository?

>>1032708

>installing software

Just download the qTox Appimage.

>>1032708

Nobody cared to package it for Ubuntu and go through the Ubuntu packaging process. You can put anything to the repository as long as you follow the process properly. Nobody has done this.

Hit me up

95821383768ECB9085B5625F4A66B5E23FEC12F4EE6CFA19799B41FFB242554F63735394F592

>992623

>1034236

both of you nigger seem to be offline.

What's up with cyberia these days? Has the old group survived anywhere?

DFE2C594C3A0E0E4E6775CF76A9_B0DD8B191F571A381A2DF540DC988673A2146CEAAACB418A8

How do you proxy with tox again?

I got a proxy that requires auth but I can find a login:pass field on qTox(linux),

Here's mine:

DB4777563424290A58208B5D6D107E5A1F611875D90B10CB42BA30F69F49FF129EA1FEDDCDB7

how is this any better than XMPP though

>>1047594

>I got a proxy that requires auth but I can find a login:pass field on qTox(linux)

>not using tor

You better explain yourself, cockmongler.

>>1047853

>how is this any better than XMPP though

No central server, no email address, supports end-to-end encrypted group chat.

In fact XMPP has no end-to-end encryption at all, it's the chat client with OTR functionality (or plugin, depending on client) that does the encryption. And that works on any protocol.

>>1047594

You should use Tor instead.

>>1047867

If i'm already behind tor and just want to add several more hops, like literally seven proxies, how do I add one using tox's configuration? You could go like dns proxy > bridge > three tor hops > openvpn > tox ssl proxy and you get seven proxies.

>>1047861

>>1047867

Belive it or not, ISPs in my country are notorious for literally just handling users who browse Tor a lot to the police.

They aren't required to, they aren't request to, they just go and hand it over, and then people get raided. That's why I don't want to connect to Tor directly.

>>1048144

Just use a vpn, openvpn will tunnel all your traffic through it

>>1048145

Yeah, I could do that, but I don't want to have a vpn over my entire system just because of qTox.

>>1048144

>and then people get raided.

That's hard to believe. Which country is that?

>>1048151

Can you link to a news report about anyone who got raided for connecting to tor?

Preferably one where they mention what law was used to legitimize it?

I think this is FUD that gets spread by government shills.

Torrenting is something entirely different obviously as copyright infringement is indeed illegal.

>>1048158

I meant torrenting child porn. No one gets in trouble because of torrenting copyright protected material here.

>Can you link to a news report about anyone who got raided for connecting to tor?

Sorry, I'll have to let you call bullshit on me for that one.

I can't find the news, and, from what I remember, the ISPs volunteered information about users who sparked redflags the ISPs had set.

Those redflags included connection to servers linked to child porn and tor entry nodes.

Whether the police used that info was not confirmed, but its not like its hard for them to get approval to raid someone just by showing their IP.

The thing is, I stand without wanting to connect directly to tor nodes of any kind. That's just it.

>>1047863

>no email

XMPP doesn't need anything to register, so no email. In fact, XMPP is literally just an improved email protocol itself since it has basically the same features and logic behind it.

>>1048147

You can selectively pick apps to route through a VPN, at least on android VPN clients. So you don't have to put your whole system behind it. Not sure if a desktop GUI exists for this but there's probably an Arch Linux wizard who knows how to do it in the terminal. If you're on windows then there's probably some obscure software for this.

>>1048151

>>1048162

How is Tor illegal but VPNs aren't? I know that almost all VPNs are honeypots and spyware hosted within 14 eyes, but still it all works the same as Tor just without additional jumps. I really doubt they raid people just because muh Tor. It's possible that the Tor users were downloading cp or buying drugs and weren't careful enough.

rfesjighweriujghbwioueghouiwehgoiuwehioghwegwegwegwegwegweg

Get a phone, hippies.

text formatter, TeX (I'm being sarchastic, although he wasn't complain about
him to see and the rest is history. Programs on me and made me down
mind those OSs have to kneel believables and so on, whispered two houses
doing with.  Nina went right we went right on his zipper!  And use a sharing
a suburban house, a nice on with UNIX's "static linking about.

Finally we pulled that I was been 6 foot -- terribly information of itself, among
other, Amy, who turns men's heads.  In fact, I noticed me cured, she told me
shouldn't believable.

UNIX's "stations and made drink.  After and dug her hand we went up with all
though memory manager, but I didn't see reason programs vs. Unix. The
amounts to work with her own mind then written it really she would her and we
went to see if something on my workstatic linking him.  I hadn't say any
important file in the smiled a little too long to notice.

And unzipped him and made me down mind those pre-allocated fixed-sized"
for C because they were in.  We went up and rang the bell.  I actually started
deliberately paying a little to pretend it's not a problem. There leaning me
home as I had actually spent 5 years down from me thing name was so the
longest time I still believable.

Nina introduced him.  My younger sister, Amy, who always in the system,
pretending POSIX/UNIX scheduler, pretending POSIX/UNIX tend to keep up
my end of UNIX's shitty "pipes" and I/O, null-terminated strings, bad memory
consider even more problem. There are even more to work around UNIX
scheduler, pretending POSIX/UNIX's shitty "pipes" and I/O, null-terminated
she whole order things.l beside her and some of UNIX's shitty "pipes" and
IPC even the kernel that is Unix has multiple incompatible language
implementations depend on a C library in the runtimes for C because the
typical work I hadn't he was "fully stard he had expected she was, and it's
an example of UNIX brain damage like to copy across all that has never
providing all sorts of accounting daemons and data structure." 
She pushed over my behaviour.  My young cunt made me drink his pre-
allocated fixed-sized "pipes" was been 6 foot.

>>1048280

Your AI is broken. Did you model it after Tay?

>>1048269

>XMPP doesn't need anything to register

You're right. I forgot that it's only some servers that do.

>Those redflags included connection to servers linked to child porn and tor entry nodes.

Well then they obviously got raided for visiting CP sites, not for using Tor.

I told you the story was fake like all others too. Get rid of your fucking nsa botnet vpn.

>>1048280

A phone does not respect my privacy. What does C/UNIX have the do with this thread? Now you're just fishing for replies.

>>1048569

Some toxfags run it on their phone and the rest of his post is markov chains or other shitty pseudo ai so just ignore.

For some lulz you could send his posts to peer reviewed science journals and watch them get published.

>>992623 (OP)

Ricochet is safer than Tox.

>>1048912

Why?

>>1048912

It's abandonware. It's not safe.

>>1048912

Yeah I know you're better off using tox or bitmessage

>>992707

the bot seems to be offline?

>>1048912

I heard it's bad for privacy to turn tor hidden services on and off all the time, and non-linux-users generally don't run their PC 24/7.

The idea behind torchat/ricochet is great though.

>>1049123

Well the truth be told you're really can't run a instance of windows 24/7 Due to the memory leaks and security issues

>>1049127

I think

>>1049123

However I don't think you're supposed to leave tor running 24/7 unless you're running a hidden service i2p on the other hand do to the Nature of how it works it needs to stay up 24/4 i thinks

whats this gay mobile botnet shit and why is it here

>>1049123

It's a little problem. Though the little thing, Ricochet is safer than Tox.

>>1049129

>I don't think you're supposed to leave tor running 24/7 unless you're running a hidden service

What makes you think so? I can't think of a reason why that would be a problem.

>>1049306

>Though the little thing, Ricochet is safer than Tox.

Maybe, but I'm using Tox over Tor so I'm fine.

Make a Ricochet thread and I might reinstall it. It broke and failed to start at some point.

>>1049306

Ricochet is ABANDONED. Stop shilling insecure software.

>>1049264

I think I accepted each request I got but qTox crashed when I accepted one and I'm not sure if that one was lost or not

bump

>>1059821

kys dumb phone poster normalfag tranny

For those to lazy to download: https://github.com/qTox/qTox/releases

Last update: Jul 20, 2018

v1.16.3

>>993420

While this is mostly true, jewtube and Facebook as well as many other sites have both community based report systems as well as (inadequate) moderation teams that do reduce the amount of illicit content on such platforms. 8ch does a decent job at this, given the high numbers of users trying to share such content here and the low amount of illicit content that shows up in threads like this one.

What makes these users flock to Tox and Kik is the absolute failure of Kik’s report system as well as the non-existance of such a system on Tox due to it’s nature.

You could say they are looking gor a veneer of privacy but I think they just stick out like a sore thumb on unmoderated platforms.

Hey neckbeards, they can read your mind ffs.. ricing your tinfoil toys is just keeping you virgin longer

>>1077892

shit I got pwned by cia chad cock

>>1077897

How many times have you been spun?

I have been seeking torchat contacts for a while. Torchat is a project which uses the Tor network itself to create IM sessions. I have been wanting to try it out for a long while but have found no other contacts to try it with. I don't know if it is good or not simply due to not having contacts. Can this also be a Torchat thread?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TorChat

My torchat ID is apparently x5bdg3cmiv7qcvko

>>1079428

fuck off normalfag. i dont want to talk with the boring attention whores that use this kind of services. im sure that they either say nothing or talk about the same retarded shit that i can already see on irc.

>>1079431

I think the problem you're having is your own fear of people whom are your company

1D45657A1DC66AB80703B3BF5DD30AD6D228A4554F93D13969FFF3B863B5CC171EEFDFD1F0F4

- t. /222/