/tech/ - Technology★

Fuck I just saw there is tech question thread I'm retarded mods delete my post I'm sorry Captcha already is fucking up my brain

>>977210

this kind of botnet probably deserves it's own thread.

i wasn't aware that google's captcha's had this capability. javascript is only supposed to be able to give away so much information. it shouldn't be able to dump hardware. i wonder what it's using to base this on.

does it do this on a linux live usb?

could also try in a virtual machine.

the fact that it continues to do this but not to any of your other devices after a clean os install is concerning.

>Reinstalling the same OS when it's Botnet10

Try >>977214 or Windows 7.

They're looking at a number of data points but do you use your PC to log into your Google account?

test

>>977208 (OP)

>Can Captcha HWID bann people?

Yes. If you let google execute code on your devices they can do whatever they want.

Google Chrome?

>Can Captcha HWID bann people?

No, and they have no reason to do so anyways, since the goal of that captcha is collecting personal info.

They ban anonymous/hard to identify connections to discourage people from using them, if they want to ban a malicious/undesired connection they just auto-fail the captcha regardless of input: that way they can harvest data without letting the guy in.

>>977535

That's not how code works, thankfully.

From that error alone, it sounds like they're upset with the way your request is being sent, but you've used different routers and reset them.

As others have said, Google would serve no benefit from banning you from teaching their ML database instead of just failing you afterwards.

Aside from all that, why would they ban explicitly you? Why isn't this a huge problem all over this site and many others? Bit strange they'd ban 1 random guy with such insidious

>>977541

>since the goal of that captcha is collecting personal info

..and to train their Neural Network to identify objects from spying Google cars driving around your neighborhood.

<This, speaking like an Ogre from Warcraft 2:

<the slave will unknowingly train his own mastarr

https://recaptcha-demo.appspot.com/recaptcha-v3-request-scores.php

>>977541

>That's not how code works, thankfully.

Ok then nigger how about i give you a program and you run it on your computer, like you said it's not like i would be able to do anything i want with your system if you did run it, because "thats not how it werkz hur dur"

>>977208 (OP)

Change your MAC address nigger.

>hwid ban

is this a script kiddie forum now?

>>977535

the code websites run on your browser doesnt have privileges

privilege elevation exploits can already be done on browsers regardless of whether JS is enabled

fingerprinting on browsers can already be done regardless of whether JS is enabled

>>977213

>this kind of botnet probably deserves it's own thread.

>i wasn't aware that google's captcha's had this capability

it's more likely that OP is a faggot

>>979214

websites don't have access to your mac

>>977208 (OP)

I always use a VPN. My VPN has 100+ servers you can use when you pay for their service. I noticed that happened on a certain server, but when I switched it to a different one, I stopped getting that error.

I also have my browser set up so that it uses do not track, blocks ads, and clears cookies, cache, history, etc. when you close the browser. Not sure if that affected this.

>>977210

Eh, I've seen worse and mods usually don't give a shit, /tech/ likes this sort of thread anyway.

>>977599

>..and to train their Neural Network to identify objects

And it's quite funny that theoretically this captcha would be quite easy to beat by a bot with the same method.

>>979341

this has been happening for around 5 years now. recaptcha blocks certain IPs (which defeats the purpose of a captcha lol). lots of tor IPs are blocked for example. this is nothing compared to the newest cancer they rolled out this year which is blocking incompatible web browsers (such as palememe)

>has DNT enabled

wtf nigger

>>979512

the official jewgle blog said they got rid of the text captchas because their programs could solve it. so now we're left with this retarded bullshit even though nobody has ever ran an attack on the less harmful text captcha. what doesn't make sense (then again nothing the software industry does makes sense) is that companies never fix security issues until someone exploits them, but then jewgle goes ahead and preemptively "fixes" their captcha even though it was never attacked. even if it was attacked, big deal, there'd be some extra spam on some websites for a few hours until they shut it.

>>979525

>the official jewgle blog said they got rid of the text captchas because their programs could solve it.

kek, their new captcha is literally verified by their program, it's made to be solved by a computer, you tell me if that's better than the old one.

>>979506

>ANNNNDDDD the cp spammer's back

Seems he likes threads which speak ill of Jewgle. I heard Brin has a huge personal CP collection.

>>979551

Google is like Facebook: they both have the largest collection of child pornography.

Most of my bod goy browsing has been over tor for years so I haven't really had to deal with any of the latest google captcha bullshit. Have you tried different browsers or user agents? You might also want to try the audio captcha as it is significantly easier but I think they are phasing it out so it won't be around for much longer I imagine.

One thing I have noticed is that as I increase the amount of tor I use the captchas become increasingly harder to get to work, even when I am sure I clicked all the right shit. This is a fairly recent thing. Another thing is they are currently trying to get rid of the multiple choice "click all pictures with X" in favor of "click all panels with X" feature. I don't know how many times I tried to click the "get a new challenge" button because I DON'T FUCKING WANT THE PANEL CHALLENGE only to be told after 4 or 5 of those that I am a bot and to get the fuck out. Sometimes, clicking it ONCE gets me labeled as a bot which makes me want to rip my hair out.

>>979210

>hur dur

Go back to reddit scum.

>>979563

yeah they use one a dem dere risk moduls. if you use an IP from tor you get harder challenges

>>979210

>Ok then nigger how about i give you a program and you run it on your computer

Is it js ran into a browser?

Because that's what google's captcha stuff can be on the client: and while browser js can get its hands on a lot of identifying data, I'm pretty sure that getting HWIDs is not yet possible.

>>979341

Nigger you know what "do not track" does?

It ASKS politely to not be tracked.

Nothing more.

>>979525

>the official jewgle blog said they got rid of the text captchas because their programs could solve it.

The real reason is that the new captcha is a lot better for tracking users.

Reaction times, mouse movements, even choices such as "how much street sign in pic before it counts" can be used to deanonymize you.

>>979563

Google intentionally makes captchas harder for anonymous users.

>>979334

>websites don't have access to your mac

If TPB can use javascript to mine monero on your CPU then jewgle can use javascript to run ifconfig.

>>979583

DNT just increases your fingerprint nigger. and you should kill yourself for reasonining in terms of law and politics (hurr durr site #5728357235 seemms trustworthy and i think some law prevents them from lying) instead of technology

>>979593

>if something can do arbitrary calculations, it has access to ifconfig

shut the fuck up nigger. you best be trolling saying retarded ass shit like this. the only truth in any of your shit is that having JS enabled makes it more likely for you to be vulnerable to privilege escalation

>>979599

Thanks to the nigger ass kikes at Jewtel we have to actually worry about web sites getting root now. Let’s not forget Mozilla, Jewgle, and MS who cooperated to bring us the bloated web of shit.

>>979593

>If TPB can use javascript to mine monero on your CPU then jewgle can use javascript to run ifconfig.

Mining crypto is only a matter of receiving data from a server, doing amth on it, and sending the result back: no sandbox can stop that from being done, because all these things can be needed for ordinary web stuff (receive raw data, format it into a nice list, send preferences to server).

>>979599

You either replied to the wrong person or didn't read.

>>980034

>You either replied to the wrong person or didn't read.

no u

most of the device fingerprinting relies of javascript being enabled

there's audiocontext, canvas, fonts, resolution, webgl and probably more

>>980215

I doubt they'd listen. Google goes to great lengths to pamper developers, which is why they have not blocked ubo on chrome - most devs use it, even though it costs them a lot. They love how convenient googles telemetry tools are, and if you want to take that away from them they'll hate you.