[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / b2 / choroy / dempart / imouto / pinoy / russian / tingles / vichan ][Options][ watchlist ]

/tech/ - Technology

You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Email
Comment *
Verification *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

File (hide): be0df2711b4f042⋯.png (75.66 KB, 680x680, 1:1, 212.png) (h) (u)

[–]

 No.1067554>>1067599 >>1067605 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

why does /tech/ hate systemd so much?

 No.1067560>>1067586

Because they're all deranged on unix brain damage.

Systemd actually works because it isn't made by unix weenies.


 No.1067562

there are three or four fucking threads for this already


 No.1067563

Armchair sysadmins.


 No.1067573

I love systemd now after some bald guy told me that systemd is based even though he switched from systemd to runit


 No.1067585

Feature creep and a refusal to take responsibility for or fix bugs. But I personally I stopped using it because my RAID on LUKS set up with 4 drives had a 3 in 4 chance of failing to boot (after hanging for 6+ minutes waiting for timers to run out), and shutting down would take 6+ minutes due to retarded timers. I was able to fix the long timers issue, but not the boot time Russian roulette, and since this was a remote system this shit was not acceptable. The only solution I could find was to add a timer to the rescue shell prompt so if no keys were pressed it would just keep rebooting until it worked. The bug was known but not fixed for over a year. It might still exist, idk. Point being no matter how complicated or unusual the disk setup, I never had issues like this using SysV or RC scripts, and if I did I would have been able to fix them pretty easily on my own.

SystemD is probably fine for most users. I don't mind it on most of my laptops and SoCs, but I'll never use it on a server or desktop again.


 No.1067586

>>1067560

this, unixnazis btfo


 No.1067599

>>1067554 (OP)

It's anti-UNIX.


 No.1067605

>>1067554 (OP)

It's the rube Goldberg of init systems.

The feature creep only makes that fact worse.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
8 replies | 0 images | Page ???
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / b2 / choroy / dempart / imouto / pinoy / russian / tingles / vichan ][ watchlist ]